this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
345 points (95.8% liked)

News

23612 readers
5094 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Like many Americans, Carolina Giuliani was paralyzed over the prospect that Donald Trump — the man she blames for ruining her father and damaging her family — could be close to returning to the White House.

“It’s a hard phenomenon to understand. It definitely is,” Carolina Giuliani said. “I view Trump as a disease, and I think it’s really important to remember that with every disease, prevention is a much more effective strategy than treatment. ... I thought we had cured ourselves of it the first time, but it doesn’t seem like we have.

“And I think if he becomes the president again, we may have a terminal illness in our country. And that really, really scares me.”


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 126 points 2 months ago (9 children)

She’s close. Trump isn’t the disease, though, he’s a symptom. The disease is Christian nationalism, and it’s been festering far longer than Trump has been on the national scene.

The disease lies in the Heritage Foundation, the Federalist Society, and a few other groups hell-bent on turning the US into a theocracy. They’ve been working on this for a very long time, and have been testing the fences for decades, like velociraptors, only making their move now they’ve found all the weaknesses they need to succeed.

It worries me how focussed people are on the threat trump poses, because even if he dropped dead today, it would only be a temporary inconvenience to these dominionists who have infiltrated nearly every facet of the US government. They will not stop if trump disappears, or if Harris is elected.

Please, watch The Family documentary. You’ll be amazed and likely sick at how deeply they’ve embedded themselves.

[–] cmbabul 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ahem, you forgot the John Birch Society

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yes, thank you! There are a few others, and these aren’t disparate groups. They all work together.

e: The membership Venn diagram is often a circle.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Here’s another recent article (2022) that goes into more detail: Who are the Dominionists backing conservative candidates?.
And another: Dominionism Rising: A Theocratic Movement Hiding in Plain Sight

Other notable dominionists:
Ron DeSantis
Ted Cruz
Kari Lake
Amy Coney-Barrett
Brett Kavanaugh
Mike Johnson
Mike Pence
Roger Stone
Tucker Carlson
Bill Barr
Pretty much everyone in Trump’s orbit.

There are hundreds more. This should scare the shit out of all of us.

Here’s the Wikipedia article on Christian Dominionism.

This is not fringe. It’s mainstream.

e: names

[–] MutilationWave 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I can't imagine Roger Stone is a true believer. He's a mercenary.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

That’s fair. It’s hard to know what a snake actually thinks. He’s been sliming for their cause since Nixon*, though, so this may be a distinction without a difference.

e: my autocorrect hates me.

[–] MutilationWave 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Exactly! Nixon wasn't driving towards some Dominionist shit that I'm aware of. He was a crooked politician that worked for the nascent oligarchy. He deliberately fucked up peace in Vietnam to win an election. The shit that got him run out was small potatoes.

Stone just wants to get paid and win.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

No, I mean the opposite.

Stone may not have been stanning for dominionism under Nixon (it was only a twinkle in their eye at that point), but Stone walks, talks, and quacks like a dominionist.

Is he an opportunist or a believer? I can’t claim to know, but he says dominionist things, does dominionist things, and surrounds himself almost exclusively by dominionists, so he’s a de facto dominionist.

e: I really should learn to spell, and also use words

[–] MutilationWave 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I agree he's looking duckish these days but I still think he believes in nothing but money, fame, and power. And here we are talking about him. 🦆☝️

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Sorry to keep clarifying, but I want to make sure people understand the depth of this threat.

The only reason you could credibly claim Stone isn’t a dominionist is because it didn’t quite exist when he was criming for Nixon.

He was intimately involved with the founders of dominionism, and worked very closely with all those same people during its rise over the past few decades, and now works so closely with its adherents, they could all be a Cronenberg monster.

e: nevermind, I get your point. He’s a mercenary, and I agree, but his position as a mercenary specifically for dominionists makes him especially dangerous, IMO.

[–] Etterra 6 points 2 months ago

They also have been moving pieces into place at the lower levels of government. They need to cheat as hard as possible to overcome their ever-growing unpopularity.

[–] InverseParallax 4 points 2 months ago

The disease is the dixiecrats, Christian nationalism is the latest syndrome after we tried to treat jim Crow and the KKK, which was what was left over after slavery went into brief remission during reconstruction.

The south will always find a new way to be evil and un-American, it's their legacy.

[–] jimmy90 3 points 2 months ago

...and all of these groups are sponsored by the parasitic billionaire class

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SGGeorwell 82 points 2 months ago (6 children)

The Trumpist members of my family are proud to be recalcitrant about it all. It’s at least three parts: first there’s the gulf between us, and then the knowledge of the breadth of it, and lastly the pride of standing so far away from everyone. It’s not just that they’re way past the orbit of Pluto. It’s also the fact that they’re so proud to be so far out.

[–] [email protected] 68 points 2 months ago (4 children)

My grandfather, who is generally a good-natured but immature man, really ate up everything Fox News spewed at him about Trump. He and my grandmother always play the pity card that I don't visit them, but they've been supremely unpleasant to be around for the last 8 years because they can't leave politics out of it.

He wore a MAGA hat to my nephew's 3rd birthday party and explicitly stated that he did it to make others uncomfortable. So no gramps, I don't really want to visit you these days.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 months ago

If you're doing stuff to make people uncomfortable at a fucking 3 year oldest birthday party, yeah it's time for you to stop getting invited.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

time to scatter banned books all around the house when he visits and put on your WOKE AF tshirt --"oh, does that make you...uncomfortable? grandma?"

[–] ABCDE 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

really ate up everything Fox News spewed

It's amazing how little accountability exists for those spreading it.

[–] sirboozebum 2 points 2 months ago

Or those who believe it.

Like really, it is mostly bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Your grandfather sounds like a dick, not a good natured man. Punch him in the face next time you see him.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I completely understand that reaction. When I say immature I mean a man who was abused by family so he ran away at 14 and kind of arrested his development at that point. So even things like this that sound completely insane don't feel that insane to my family members.

I've had conversations with other family members to try to get them to imagine hearing this story without knowing who he was to really see how beyond the pale it was.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Louder for the people in the back, thanks.

I believe its unfounded self-righteousness.

They are totally self assured and prideful, no matter how fuckstupid they are. They even pride their own ignorance.

[–] Eldritch 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

People want to believe that they're informed. Want to believe that they know things others don't. That they are wise. And will push back when challenged. Because they don't know the one thing every wise person knows. Just how much they don't know. Fools are confidently wrong. The wise are cautiously correct.

[–] IchNichtenLichten 18 points 2 months ago

45 years ago:

“Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'”

― Isaac Asimov

[–] Whats_your_reasoning 12 points 2 months ago

You're absolutely right. I'd just like to add on:

Wise people learn from the mistakes of others. They observe and take note of chains of events, and use that knowledge in order to guide their own decisions in the future.

Wise people question what they believe. If they feel cognitive dissonance, they don't ignore it; they examine their ideas and consider the prospect that they may be wrong. They can change their minds based on new evidence.

Wise people are skeptical. When they learn about a situation, they don't take immediate sides based on knee-jerk emotions. Rather, they examine all available information and come around to their own ideas in their own time.

Using all of the above points are what guide wise people towards "cautiously correct" decisions. They are more likely "correct" because they base their ideas on a greater pool of information, and are capable of discarding ideas even if the ideas "feel good" to believe in. They remain "cautious," because no matter how sure they believe they are, they are well aware that there's a chance they could still be mistaken.

[–] acosmichippo 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The trumpets in my family, aunt and uncle, are different. they pretend to be affable and loving, act like they want to see us, but every time we get together they CAN NOT HELP themselves from talking shit about liberals or whatever the latest fox propaganda is. And they know my parents, my wife and I are left to varying degrees. So I finally said fuck it, clearly you do not respect me, so I don't need your bullshit in my life anymore.

[–] EleventhHour 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I believe a large part of Trump supporters are that way due to some overgrown form of Oppositional-Defiant Disorder.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

I'd disagree on that considering these people trend toward obedience in everything like police/laws, Christianity, "traditional values," party politics, etc, etc.

I think it's more a superiority complex where instead of being boring nobodies, they're actually insiders with special knowledge that the rest of the masses don't have. Additionally, right wing propaganda gives them scapegoats to blame for all their life problems (financial, social, personal). Add these two together and you have the modern republican base.

[–] MutilationWave 3 points 2 months ago

I certainly think it's a part of it. As someone who knows some people I think have ODD, they're easier to work on than true believers. You can find common ground in fuck this system talk, but guide that towards a better future instead.

Source: years of working with hearts and minds of people I care about. I identify with ODD. I probably could have been classified ODD at some point.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

recalcitrant

adjective

re·​cal·​ci·​trant ri-ˈkal-sə-trənt 

Synonyms of recalcitrant

1

**: **obstinately defiant of authority or restraint

2

a

**: **difficult to manage or operate

b

**: **not responsive to treatment

c

**: **RESISTANT

this subject is recalcitrant both to observation and to experiment—G. G. Simpson

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 months ago (1 children)

She’s absolutely correct. I lost my father to Trump about a year ago. It got so bad that I had to block all contact with him. No email, no text, no calls.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't speak to my mother anymore for the very same reason, but she was in the tank for Trump since day one. She's always been a hyper conservative cunt, and honestly I jumped at the opportunity to remove her from my life.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’m sorry to hear you had to do that. It sucks to lose a parent like this. I’m not happy about my situation. But I don’t need that in my life either.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

I'm sorry that your experience wasn't as liberating. From a young age I've never gotten along with my mother, so when the time came to rip the bandaid off it was more of a relief than anything else.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago

Trump is the vector, not the disease itself.

The disease is the curdling rage of the (mostly) working class that's massively failed to achieve the American Dream(TM) that was promised to them, which has been perfectly heightened misdirected and cultivated by decades of right wing radio talk show hosts, psuedo 'philosophers', outright racist and religious extremists, conservative 'think tanks' lending credibility to failed economic doctrines, 30+ years of conservative influence on our public education systems essentially ruining it to the point that now only around 10% of Americans are capable of comparing and contrasting news coverage critically... etc etc.

Trump was just the first presidential candidate to completely drop the pretense and show the country that its fine to go totally mask off with your inane bullshit falsehoods, that there is no real need for anything other than appeal via signifiers and cliches and dogwhistle.

Actual policy means nothing, only spin.

Actual hypocrisy means nothing, just sling more baseless shit at others.

Reality means nothing, everyone else is wrong, you know in your heart what I am telling you, no matter how contradictory or incomprehensible it is, is true...

... because it allows you to feel rightfully indignant.

This has always been the strong undercurrent amongst conservatives.

Trump was just the vector that metastisized it into basically mass psychosis.

[–] DarkCloud 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

People feel wronged and betrayed by the system, and like they need that reflected in who they vote for as their representative.

He is that person for those people (hence why they love the mugshot).

The Republican side of politics knows this is the emotional driver, so they direct most of their media to that kind of grievance politics, and claiming they'll "fix" these persecution issues in extraordinary ways.

People like Musk and Thiel fund these campaigns.

Trump thinks he can fix it all by breaking the system that he sees as persecuting him; the system of democracy and the rule of law.

So he wants all its powers. He wants to be a dictator. Then you'll see his politics and only his, and there'll be no more persecution, no more broken system. Just him.

That's how the right wingers feel. They're emotionally locked into this.

That's why they're still on board, for the political solution to their emotional disenfranchisement, for their own sense something's wrong with everyone but them to he proven out with power. Being onboard with Trump proves there's a broken system they've been wronged by, and someone powerful is in that boat with them.

It's a cult, just as much as neoliberal compromise with the Capitalist forces of self-sacrifice is a cult.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My father revealed that he had been bullshitting about every moral lesson he had ever tried to tell me when he went maga.

[–] Bonesince1997 4 points 2 months ago

That's just it, once you reveal you don't stand for some things that do carry that moral weight good luck trying to convince anyone of the kind going forward. I wouldn't listen anymore. People have sacrificed too much and just plug their ears to the effects of it. What do they really stand for?

[–] A_Random_Idiot 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

its not a fuckin disease.

You can catch a disease through no fault of your own.

These MAGA fucktards willfully disregard common sense, and truth, and decency, and their own christian moral values, because service to the party and the orange lord is paramount.

everything about MAGA is willful and intentional.

These are not poor innocent victims, These are rampant, fascist pieces of shit, that finally felt comfortable enough to let their swastikas fly when they thought they had their chance at seizing glory and crushing the opposition that would are make them face repercussions for their abhorrence.

People trying to desperately shift blame away from them, and turn them into victims, is bullshit, and nothing but evidence of how well all these right wing pieces of shit managed to stay under the radar and mask themselves until they thought the time was right.

[–] acosmichippo 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

She means disease in the macro sense, like America is diseased. People are no different than they were any time before, just now they are being manipulated by their emotions and biases with profit-driven 24 hour news and social media.

[–] MutilationWave 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There are plenty of people as described but there are also plenty of rubes going along with it. Plenty of peer pressure, plenty who fall for save the children shit who otherwise mean well.

I just had some blood work done a couple days ago and the nice woman and I talked about the aftermath of Helene. We talked about how horrible it was, how similar our geography was to the worst affected areas. She was genuinely upset and said if she made more money she'd be donating to the victims. I brought up that FEMA said that Helene has fucked their budget up. She told me that it would have been fine if they hadn't spent all that money on those immigrants.

I may think this person is stupid, but I don't believe she is malicious.

[–] A_Random_Idiot 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Then you would be a fool.

Cause shes just as malicious as the rest of them, If she wasnt she wouldnt be spouting that fucking racist nonsense.

You are just fooled by a cute face and little charade personality she puts on until she let her mask slip.

[–] MutilationWave 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Believe me there was no cute face involved but mine. And it's more chiseled handsome than cute anyway.

She definitely changed the subject as soon as I said neutrally that most immigrants are here legally.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago

This is the underlying article written by Caroline Giuliani: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/story/caroline-giuliani-trump-kamala-harris

load more comments
view more: next ›