this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
119 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3799 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FuglyDuck 31 points 1 month ago (4 children)

So.... there is a limit.

Apparently, you can't be both black and nazis and get elected by the GOP

[–] FrostyTheDoo 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh you can definitely be both of those things, you just can't say it out loud publicly. That's the only thing he messed up in Republicans' eyes

[–] barsquid 3 points 1 month ago

I don't know. IMO we'd have to re-run the experiment controlling for the type of pornography to be certain.

[–] SkyezOpen 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm curious how many votes he lost for being black and how many for being a nazi. I have a guess which number is greater.

[–] FuglyDuck 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Prolly lost more votes for getting outed as a porn addict rather than being a nazi.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

JD Vance is openly looking into zoophilic porn and republicans don't mind it.

[–] FuglyDuck 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

he's just trying to get called something other than couchfucker.

unforntunately, couchfucker sticks harder than goatfucker.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Which reminds me of that old joke: "but you fuck one coach..."

Edit: just spotted my typo... I'll leave it in😊

[–] FuglyDuck 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

but he hasn't even fucked a couch!

Or so he insists. One doth protest too much, methinks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I never said anyone did, i was just reminded about a joke describing how some actions overshadows other activities when retold among peers.

[–] FuglyDuck 2 points 1 month ago

Sorry, my joke didn’t quite land- “couchfucker” stuck and he “didn’t even fuck a coach one time.”

(He does protest a bit much though. Maybe he tried it after it came out, or something.)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Made out with a hot dog?? Oh my god, that was ONE TIME!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I wish I knew how to respond to this... but I can't even...

[–] WoahWoah 7 points 1 month ago

"A good chunk of those sticking by Robinson may only be doing so because he is a Republican."

No. Shit. Lol

[–] GraniteM 6 points 1 month ago

When asked whether Vance believes Robinson’s denial that the comments were made by him, Vance said that the situation needed to “play out.”

“I don’t not believe him, I don’t believe him — I just think that you have to let these things sometimes play out in the court of public opinion."

Remember that for Republicans it's not a matter of how despicable a candidate is, it's only a matter of if they're popular or not. Vance came right out and said that the truth doesn't matter, just public opinion. If 50.1% of voters in North Carolina were going to vote for Robinson, the GOP wouldn't care what he said. If that number was 49.9%, it wouldn't matter if he was an amalgamation of Jesus Christ and Captain America, they'd throw him to the curb and claim they'd never heard of him.

They have no principles. The only thing they believe in is power; getting it, and using it against the people they hate. That is their only true ideology.

[–] shalafi 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Democrat Josh Stein up 53% to Robinson’s 36%

JFC, how is it not 95% to 5%?

[–] WoahWoah 3 points 1 month ago

He's a self-loathing black republican. And a self-described black nazi. He's like a unicorn to Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Are we sure the public notoriety over his past isn’t his kink?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I want his defeat to be written in history books. I want his name to be remembered in history the way we remember Darwin Awards winners.

This guy is pure lead brains.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -5 points 1 month ago

CNN - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for CNN:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.cnn.com/2024/09/27/politics/mark-robinson-north-carolina-governor-poll/index.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support