this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
412 points (98.6% liked)

News

22961 readers
3660 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
JonsJava
rjc
Thekingoflorda
dezmd
Tenthrow
[email protected]
enu
[email protected]
gedaliyah
Blackbeard
little_cow
jeffw
412
US judge demoted after detaining teenage girl during field trip to courtroom (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 2 days ago by MicroWave to c/news
41 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Judge faces lawsuit after forcing student to put on jail garments and handcuffs and enter isolated holding cell

A Detroit judge who briefly detained a teenage girl who fell asleep in his courtroom during a school field trip to learn about the justice system was demoted to presiding over traffic court as he faces a federal lawsuit.

Judge Kenneth King was moved to the state court’s traffic division after the incident on 13 August. King was temporarily removed from the bench as he completed mandatory training following his actions.

“We appreciate his efforts in preparing for this role, and wish him success as he transitions into this new responsibility,” said the chief judge, William McConico, in a statement.

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I was so, so waiting for consequences to finally reach this asshole. Reminder that this teenage student and her family *were experiencing homelessness and was apparently exhausted trying to meet all her responsibilities! She needed an advocate, not a bully. This is the type of person that demands respect from you, while not valuing you as a human, beyond considering what you can do for him. I hope he endures excruciating traffic cases until he is removed from the bench...

EDIT: Changed to people-first language.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago

Dude had a fucking power boner.

He saw a tired teenager who was bothering nobody as an opportunity to wave his dick around.

[–] [email protected] 158 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

The bigger picture here is that he had an active YouTube livestream with roughly a 1000 fans that he used to interact with while in cases over the last few years. He even repositioned the cameras for them while he was harrasing that poor girl.

Its clear that his treatment of her was not only an ego trip, but one done for views.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Hmm the world has already turned more dystopian than I had assumed

[–] [email protected] 66 points 2 days ago (3 children)

What in the fuck? I'm surprised they even let cameras in the courtroom, let alone let the judge be a streamer!

[–] Bassman1805 45 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I can see a certain angle where it makes sense: youth/general outreach, educating people about the court system. Something a little more interactive/entertaining than CSPAN, but more real than Judge Judy.

But you throw "influencer culture" into the mix and you've got a disastrous recipe for The Chat influencing the outcome of cases.

[–] Zahille7 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only way I could see it potentially working is if there's like a team who handles the whole thing.

Maybe there's one or two cameras, one facing the courtroom and the other facing the judge. The judge doesn't see any screens of any kind, and doesn't have access to a keyboard or anything to interact with a chat, if there even is one; ideally there would be no chat and it would just be a stream you watch. If there is a chat, someone else should be handling it and possibly not even in the same room.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

My link goes into it, but thats what the court oversight commission in the state wants. An inhouse system where streams and their features are centrally controlled. They have not been able to get funding to stand that up, but they have been advocating for it.

Their current recommendation is that YouTube comments be disabled, but they don't have the legal mandate to enforce that apparently. This judge's shitty behaviour may help them make that case at least.

[–] stoly 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They are public places with public proceedings. For the most part, you can just go in and sit down and watch a case, assuming there is space.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

It varies wildly by location as to whether or not recording equipment is allowed in. Why do you think courtroom sketch artists are still a thing?

[–] humorlessrepost 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

My local court house makes all non-lawyers leave their phones in their cars. You can watch all you want, but only with your eyes. They won’t let you through the metal detector with a phone.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Well there’s a difference between them streaming things to the public for the sake of transparency, and you taking private videos for god knows what.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

This guy gets demoted and Eileen Cannon gets nothing? Total BS

[–] macarthur_park 77 points 2 days ago (2 children)

King is facing a federal lawsuit filed by Eva Goodman, 15, and her mother, Latoreya Till, after Goodman was forced to put on jail garments, handcuffed and put in an isolated holding cell during an educational trip to King’s courtroom.

The trip certainly was educational, though probably not in the way the school intended.

[–] pdxfed 6 points 1 day ago

But perhaps exactly what was (unfortunately) needed;

Don't assume institutions and those in power or authority are anything more than fallible efforts. Ever.

[–] b3an 4 points 1 day ago

Ironically the judge got himself an educatin’ too didn’t he. Fuck around power tripping and find out.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Demoted for illegally kidnapping a child. Wild. Better than nothing I guess.

[–] Avatar_of_Self 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He's an elected judge. I don't know Michigan's laws but there might not be much more that can be done by the court administration themselves. I personally also took Chief Judge McConico's statement as a tactful 'fuck you' to Judge King.

[–] stoly 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yep. Everyone wants blood but can't get past the fact that there are laws and procedures.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Innocent until proven guilty in matters of law, for better AND for worse.

[–] VelvetStorm 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ya, that's only when you are on trial, and he isn't on trial or even being legally charged with a crime. There is also a video of the incident, so there really is zero ambiguity here.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Yes, hence the "AND for worse" part

[–] nothingcorporate 13 points 1 day ago

Yeah I'm not at all surprised it happened, I am surprised there was some sort of consequence, weak as it is.

[–] PriorityMotif 31 points 1 day ago

They should demote him to defendant.

[–] Aarrodri 60 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Good. Powertrip consequences.

[–] Etterra 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If I was the family of this girl I'd want to sure this dude so hard he'd end up living in a box under a bridge. Then go find him and take away his box.

[–] VelvetStorm 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ya, I agree that they should 100% get some sort of monetary compensation for this. The issue is that the judge has a lot of money and can get a much better lawyer than them. They are already close to being homeless so I don't imagine they can afford a good lawyer, there may be 1 or 2 who would take the case Pro Bono but I'm betting most would offer to do it for 40% of the winnings.

[–] Etterra 3 points 8 hours ago

Yeah I know. We live in hell.

[–] piecat 5 points 1 day ago

40% of the winnings is a bargain. The difference in good lawyers is both the time spend on your case, and how much they win.

That 60% wouldn't be gotten without the lawyer.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 days ago

Imagine getting him for your traffic court hearing.