this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
156 points (95.3% liked)

politics

18990 readers
3175 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Rep. Nancy Pelosi chided CNN anchor Jake Tapper on Tuesday for bringing up Donald Trump’s latest baseless smear of Vice President Kamala Harris regarding her acuity.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 94 points 1 week ago (1 children)

She's right. Giving airtime to an incompetent blowhard talking out his ass is the infuriating norm that is killing the US. "But he's the nominee". Fuck off you sellout. Have some integrity.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 52 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Good for her. The standard response from any Democrat should be, "I'll respond to his points when he makes one. I'm not responding to his baseless, slanderous remarks."

[–] mojofrododojo 1 points 1 week ago

"sorry I don't give rapists my attention."

"I stopped listening to Trump when he went into a private meeting with Putin without notes or translators."

"Of course the GOP is going to attack Harris, the only thing they can do is drag them down, there's nothing the GOP can do to build up their platform because it's built on hair spray and orange paint."

[–] FardyCakes 69 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Listen, Pelosi is just as much a ghoul as most of Congress, but she’s absolutely right here. The media keeps ignoring their responsibilities as much as Congress has ceded its responsibilities to the executive branch. The Supreme Court and Presidency seem to be the only “estates” flexing any of their power and the US does everything it can to get morally reprehensible tools into those positions.

Tapper looks like Trump talking about Jan 6 or the death of Rowe v. Wade shielding himself from blame by saying “He’s the nominee, I thought you might have a reaction.”

What is CNN a fucking YouTube channel now? Are you doing a podcast Jake? Fuck off you corporate shill. Go hang out with Joe Rogan.

Disgraceful.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago

Jake Tapper is a fool reading what he was told to. Not a journalist or reporter. CNN has been captured by the right.

[–] givesomefucks 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Now Taper's lies are suddenly an issue for her?

If the Dem party had stood up for Talib when he did the same thing to her. He might not have done this

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

That was a bit different though - Tapper quickly apologized (see https://adc.org/demand-cnn-jake-tapper-and-dana-bash-apologize-for-false-attacks-on-rep-rashida-tlaib/ & https://www.commondreams.org/news/rashida-tlaib-false-allegations )

It is a bit tough to see though - Dems stick together in opposing the GOP, but when we see a fight between two Dems they try to avoid getting involved (as per https://www.mediaite.com/news/watch-gov-whitmer-completely-dodges-when-confronted-by-jake-tapper-about-whether-rep-tlaib-made-an-anti-semitic-smear-against-michigans-ag/ )

Though I also understand why Whitmer wouldn't directly speak out. Nessel is under Whitmer, so Whitmer would be publically criticising her own subordinate. But, this wouldn't apply to Pelosi.. the best I can say about that is the issue with Nessel was just elow Pelosi's radar.

[–] Ensign_Crab 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's funny. The Democratic Party standing up for a progressive.

[–] anticolonialist 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No need to stand up for progressives when you got people like Dick Cheney on your side.

[–] Ensign_Crab 1 points 1 week ago

No willingness to stand up for progressives, regardless of who is on their side.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago
[–] Suavevillain 2 points 1 week ago

Local stock guru snaps at terrible news media man.

[–] btaf45 2 points 1 week ago

Jake Tapper is the worst. Can't stand the guy.

[–] GoofSchmoofer 2 points 1 week ago

I think Jake Tapper and many others shouldn't be called a journalist but a "News Influencer"

[–] Unlocalhost 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wait people still watch CNN

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I live in Canada, and I have neighbours HERE that watch CNN.