this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
1033 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19223 readers
3052 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Reminds me of that SNL skit he was in: https://youtu.be/7AWuBh1MbbM?si=UVg016Prcl9WbYYB

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt 114 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I love it. But I'd love more signs pointing out how much he hates veterans. That's something I'd donate to.

And that he hates unions, in areas of high union population

[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 months ago

Republican Voters Against Trump have been running veteran billboards for a while. The DNC has been running billboards calling him and anti-union scab.

I think the chicken angle hits a bit different though, a lot of people write off everything trump says as just talk, and many attacks seem to get ignored as slander, but the fact he's unwilling to debate is a plain and uncontested fact, one that makes him look weak.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I want more about how he's the only president to advocate for a complete gun ban.

I can't believe Harris's campaign isn't pressing harder on that point.

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I know about the time he said "take the guns, due process later", and the blanket bump stock back, but was there more?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

No, but that should be enough.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

That's more than most (maybe all?) elected Democrats have ever said.

And yet...

[–] sfbing 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt 1 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Him being afraid of debating Harris again makes me believe he's a little less braindead than I could assume, lmao.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm just trying to imagine the person who drives through town, sees that sign, and makes up their mind on who to vote for based on that message.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago (9 children)

Everyones mind is made up. At this point it's just about turn out. If you can make a candidate look more Pathetic right before voting, the enthusiasm to support them by actually doing something that requires a little effort dwindles.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] saltesc 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

But didn't he say he won? While rattling off bingo numbers that seemed to have no correlation with the Polish?

Edit: Oh, god. I've gone for too many jokes at once. Maybe it's time I have a kid so I can relish in their disappointment of such situations.

Edit Edit: Wow. I'm really pessimistic today.

[–] Treczoks 21 points 2 months ago

They need to pop up in Florida, all around Mar-a-Lago.

[–] gnomesaiyan 17 points 2 months ago

Sometimes, you just gotta say "cluck it" and walk away.

[–] TheGiantKorean 17 points 2 months ago

Orange Chicken (but not the delicious kind)

[–] Sam_Bass 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not a fan of pacs in general but those guys i like

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Tooto chicken debate!

It's a cock-fighting-like event but more civilised where chickens debate each other, they each have little tables & get prep time.
The winner gets a bucket of mealworms. The loser gets the same, bcs chickens are good girls.

Too-to ("Tutu") was the legendary supreme chicken debate champion that a set of debate rules is now named after, in her honour.

(TIL when I searched for a pic there is a chicken tutu market)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh, I thought the loser would be sold to a rotisserie. My bad. 😅

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No.
But pole dancing is just as valid career choice as debating.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

And has significantly greater benefits to society.

[–] xc2215x 5 points 2 months ago

Truly funny.

[–] paddirn 5 points 2 months ago

It's dumb and petty, and yet it's the level that you need to stoop to to deal with people like Trump, they only understand pettiness.

[–] LustyArgonianMana 3 points 2 months ago

I have seen hens and roos take on hawks. Don't insult them by comparing them to Trump

[–] werefreeatlast 2 points 2 months ago

No need to change the hair color either. Chicken yellow. But they had to screw up with the face.

[–] irish_link 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Real or not all this reminds me of is the later seasons of West Wing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I was gonna ask if Josh Lyman has a new job?

[–] reddig33 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I wish the dems would let this go. They’re going to get him to agree to debate and then Kamala is going to make some minor flub that the press will run wild with despite Trump constantly speaking in word salad. The last thing you want is a “Howard Dean scream” this late in the campaign cycle. Just let Tim Walz mop up the floor with Vance in October, and then let us all vote.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, this is exactly where they can hurt him.

Trump and his followers believe that they represent the silent majority that still has "real" values - like honor, strength and misogyny.

Calling them out as weird and cowards attacks exactly these values. It turns their own self image against them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cybersandwich 28 points 2 months ago

Hell no. Play to win. As soon as you start playing to "not lose", you'll lose.

I love the confidence of this and let's not pretend she won't smack him harder the second time. She's a former prosecutor and she's also not 800 years old.

He's scared, weak, and fragile. Call him out on it.

[–] Xenny 6 points 2 months ago

The last debate hurt his polling numbers measurably. The press can say whatever they want. Doesn't make it true

[–] MehBlah 2 points 2 months ago

They can't get mad about this just because democrats are better at.

load more comments
view more: next ›