this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
412 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2644 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Makes it very clear that Vance knows that what his doing is evil, but he's weird enough to decide to do it anyways.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] big_slap 76 points 3 months ago (2 children)

“The reason that I changed my mind on Donald Trump is actually perfectly highlighted by what’s going on in Springfield,” Vance said. “Because the media and the Kamala Harris campaign, they’ve been calling the residents of Springfield racist, they’ve been lying about them. They’ve been saying that they make up these reports of migrants eating geese, and they completely ignore the public health disaster that is unfolding in Springfield at this very minute. You know who hasn’t ignored it? Donald Trump.”

ho-ly shit. I don't even know how to react anymore.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago (4 children)

As a Canadian, hearing about poor people supposedly eating dogs and cats, now geese, it makes me wonder where the fuck are the social programs in America that help people who've been beat to shit enough that they would stoop to eating any passing animal?

[–] BanjoShepard 18 points 3 months ago

Not to say that the social programs are flourishing or anything, but it's worth noting that the tales of people eating dogs and cats in Springfield have been debunked and are unfounded rumors being perpetuated by Trump/Vance on a national stage.

[–] DekesEnormous 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What are these "social programs" you speak of?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The ones that turn the poors into Soylent Green.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

supposedly geese are delicious but I don't know how you get one on the dinner table without it killing you first.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

Bro you have been a senator from Ohio for years now and you only mentioned this issue like a week ago.

Shut the fuck up.

[–] Rapidcreek 64 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Vance, once again, nailed by the way back machine of the Internet archives. Rarely is anything ever really gone. Except for text messages between Secret Service agents on January 6.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Dammit. I hadn't forgotten, but I hadn't thought of that in a while either. Fucking hell.

[–] Sanctus 39 points 3 months ago

Its called an opportunist. They are fairweather fans that blow wherever the breeze takes them and hold no views or convictions of their own. They are the spineless chaffe that makes up most of a fascism shake.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

JD Vance has shown he is nothing but a liar. Can we cancel him and move on?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago

I plan to do exactly that, at the ballot box.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

He's ever beem anything other rhan a slippery weasel that wants to be adjacent to power. He just got really popular 8 years ago because his book about how much he hates his mom told liberals in the suburbs it's ok to hate poor rural people for being rednecks.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName 10 points 3 months ago

Nelson told CNN that during the 2016 Republican primary he agreed to delete the article at Vance’s request, so that Vance might have an easier time getting a job in Republican politics

And here I was hoping it was recent and he paid the guy to remove it and then doesn't report it becomes an illegal campaign contribution.

[–] EvilBit 8 points 3 months ago

I appreciate that you’re signal boosting “weird” but I think this is full-on “shitty”.

[–] EleventhHour 3 points 3 months ago

Oh, the ol’ reach-around, eh?

We learn more about Vance everyday…

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

As much as it fills me with joy to see fascists like JD Vance get mauled by their own past words, I hate how much this will be propped up as an argument against him today.

I think we can all agree that people change their minds, whether it be from propaganda, malicious intent, or genuine education, so the only thing he has to do to escape this line of attack is just say "my opinions changed."

I'm sure that to a degree, he still believes what he originally wrote, but has simply repressed it in favor of being able to do less thinking about his political positions, and garner more public attention and power.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -2 points 3 months ago

CNN - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for CNN:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.cnn.com/2024/09/17/politics/jd-vance-delete-2012-blog-post-attacking-gop-anti-immigrant-rhetoric?cid=ios_app
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support