this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
106 points (92.7% liked)

politics

19098 readers
3159 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
106
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by jordanlund to c/politics
 

As much as I'd like to not advertise any single media source, CNN scored the sit down interview so it is what it is.

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/harris-walz-trump-election-08-29-24/index.html

It's live right now, will be interesting to see what people think!

More:

https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/29/politics/kamala-harris-tim-walz-cnntv/index.html

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 111 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Listening to the CNN talking heads after:

Some douche-canoe said: "she's running on the fantasy that the inflation is corporate price gouging!"

That mother fucker thinks we are blind lmao.

Part of the inflation was covid retaliated, but 70% of it was Corporate Greed

[–] jordanlund 66 points 2 months ago

A day after:

https://www.newsweek.com/kroger-exec-price-gouging-comment-kamala-harris-1945982

"The admission by a Kroger executive that the company hiked prices on some goods higher than needed to account for inflation has sparked a reaction on social media from supporters of Vice President Kamala Harris."

I was like "Well no shit, because the eggs I was buying were still normal prices when Kroger was not..."

[–] return2ozma 17 points 2 months ago

I bet it was their Republican panelist Scott Jennings

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Jennings

[–] return2ozma 40 points 2 months ago (3 children)

How is healthcare policy just not an election issue anymore?

[–] jordanlund 27 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I mean, technically it is. Harris is status quo, Trump is burn it down.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He just needs another week or two to release his perfect health care plan.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] whotookkarl 7 points 2 months ago

People act like polling actually reflects reality instead of the people who decide answering polls is a good use of their time

[–] Ghostalmedia 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Polling. Politicians and pollsters often survey the public to see which issues they should prioritize.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/1675/most-important-problem.aspx

The current top issues are the economy, cost of living, poor government leadership, and immigration.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Why is immigration so high? Am I in the wrong region where I don't see a problem?

[–] jordanlund 7 points 2 months ago

That and you aren't watching Fox "News".

[–] GreenSkree 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I have no idea either. I'm guessing it's only an "issue" because Trump (and therefore Fox) won't stop talking about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jordanlund 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Will not ban fracking. Consistent stand since the debate in 2020.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

That's rural Pennsylvania lol.

[–] jordanlund 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

She learned from Clinton's coal mining fuck up.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Coal mining, also fucked up

[–] jordanlund 23 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Yup, but if you want to win an election you don't tell potential voters "So, yeah, I'm going to end your industry and put you all out of work. LOL. Learn to code or something..."

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jordanlund 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Three commercial breaks in and so far they're both doing very well.

[–] kescusay 19 points 2 months ago

Yep. So far they've been well-spoken, clear, and in a couple instances pretty funny.

[–] jordanlund 24 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Would appoint a Republican, nobody in particular in mind.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Appoint a sitting congressperson to flip their seat lololol

[–] meco03211 15 points 2 months ago

Then fire them.

[–] FlowVoid 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It's normal.

JFK, LBJ, Nixon, Carter, Reagan, GHWB, Clinton, GWB, and Obama all appointed to their cabinet at least one person from the opposite party.

And Harris didn't say she would appoint a Republican politician. When Obama chose Bob McDonald for Veterans Affairs, people barely noticed he was registered as a Republican. And one of Donald Trump's senior advisors was Ivanka Trump - who at the time was a registered Democrat.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And one of Donald Trump’s senior advisors was Ivanka Trump - who at the time was a registered Democrat.

I'm literally shocked you thought this was a good thing to write to support your point.

[–] Nurse_Robot 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's a comment about appointing people from the other side of the aisle. They posted an example of trump appointing a registered Democrat. There's plenty of criticism about it which is valid, but being literally shocked is a bit of a melodramatic overreaction

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's his literal daughter. She's not "on the other side of the aisle". There is absolutely no one with a smidgen of intelligence that thinks this was in some way evidencing bipartisanship or a concession to the left.

[–] FlowVoid 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (9 children)

That's my point. "I will appoint a Republican" does not necessarily mean "I will reach across the aisle to the opposing politicians who are ruining America".

It could very well mean "I will appoint old friends from law school and the private sector, even if they happen to be registered Republicans." People like Bob McDonald.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why would you do this? Did sorkin get to them?

[–] jordanlund 24 points 2 months ago

My guess is posing an alternative to Trump who has said the first thing he'd do is purge anyone not loyal.

https://www.govexec.com/workforce/2022/07/trump-endorsed-plan-purge-civil-service-rogue-bureaucrats/375028/

[–] negativenull 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Adam Kinzinger:

Am I a joke to you?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Stiffneckedppl 11 points 2 months ago

Raskin is a Democrat.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 10 points 2 months ago

Liz Cheney

Christ, imagine living through the '00s and thinking Dick's daughter should be anywhere near a position of power. Ffs, she threw her own sister under the bus for being a lesbian.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jordanlund 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Couple of softballs at the end, asking Walz about the Gus "that's my dad!" moment and Harris about "the photograph".

Still 10 minutes left in the hour, not sure why they stopped short.

CNN has asked Trump and Vance for a sit down as well.

[–] kescusay 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

All in all, a mediocre performance by the interviewer, while Harris and Walz were charming and good together. I got the impression they genuinely like each other.

[–] jordanlund 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Get somebody who looks at you the way Harris looks at Walz for the "that's my dad!" question.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

I told my partner about 10 times that I had a serious crush on Tim Walz lol…keep talking, boo…yeah…those sweet sweet kind words….

[–] return2ozma 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think a town hall would have been better than this interview.

[–] jordanlund 12 points 2 months ago

I'm sure there's time for that? At least one?

[–] jordanlund 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

A few questions in and the CNN interviewer seems overtly hostile.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jordanlund 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Why did it take 3 1/2 years to do anything on immigration?"

LOL.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 months ago (6 children)

CNN wants people to think they haven't been doing anything.

But she has.

And it's working.

Bet with more even more investment they wouldn't even need the Border Deal that Trump killed.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] expatriado 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

yet to see the 2 on the other side show up in the same place at the same time

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jordanlund 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Really hammering Walz on mis-statements. "Carried weapons in war, didn't have IVF, lied about DUI..."

[–] Ensign_Crab 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Still no daylight between her and Biden on Gaza.

[–] jordanlund 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nope, and there won't be as long as AIPAC has a $100 million to throw at the election.

[–] Ensign_Crab 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Such corruption is anathema to democracy.

[–] jordanlund 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Yup, and everyone told the Supreme Court this would be the end result of Citizens United.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›