227
I wonder if she wasn't female if they would use the word "Saucier"
this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
227 points (98.7% liked)
politics
19246 readers
3918 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
First thing I thought as well. If she wasn’t a woman it would be something like “sharp, more direct.”
But hey, at least we noticed the gendered language? That’s…..something.
What’s the male gender equivalent? language to saucier? Spicier? Trollier? Combative?
Harris launches bare-knuckle attack while her pendulous balls swing.
"Swing low, sweet chariots. I prefer mine au naturale." -Creed Bratton maybe.
That is something a lot of people would pay to see.
Probably "tough" or "passionate", though you could just look at one of the "both sides" titles they use for Trump's tirades.
That really depends on if she had a husband or a wife. I can see them calling a queer man saucy, I can’t imagine a straight man running for president being called saucy
....she's totally going to make him drop the n-word.
Ridiculing him until he ego makes him crack is not a terrible idea, and it's pretty damn entertaining.
Would it be? I feel like his supporters would take it as a sign that they can also openly use it without consequences.
Without consequences?
What do they always say? Fuck around and find out?
Might not be great for Biden’s unemployment numbers… but worth it.
Yeah, they thought they were going to storm the Capitol without consequences, too...
There are many Trump supporters who don't think Trump is racist. In the same way many Trump supporters don't think he is at fault for Jan 6th. He didn't literally tell his followers exactly what to do. They just happened to do exactly what he wanted then to do (until they failed).
The same is true for viewing Trump as racist. He can dog whistle all he wants. He can align himself with other racists, but he isn't racist because he didn't say the exact words.
You are right that for some people, him saying something gives them the freedom to say it (in their view). However for a sizable portion it will be clear proof that yes, he is racist. Not 100% mind you, cults are hard to leave, but 5%? 10%? Elections are won/lost in the margins and those are sizable margins.
If course I don't actually want it to happen. There is enough hate in the world and we don't need more.
Make the consequences you want to see in the world.
8 years ago Hillary got in trouble for calling them deplorable. Oh how the turn tables...
And the hit dogs hollered.
Just like when Obama said they were clinging to their guns and bibles.
The difference is that a lot of people strongly hated the Clintons. So any slip from her was a reason for the opposition to pounce.
Kamala has so much swagger that even Republicans are supporting her. It doesn't help that so many people are disgusted with Trump. So If Kamala slips, she turns it into a backflip and the opposition are too busy infighting to mount a attack.
his new tactic was on display at last week's Democratic National Convention, where Harris described Trump as "an unserious man" while also arguing that "the consequences of putting Donald Trump back in the White House are extremely serious."
Such ruthless. Very sauce. Wow.
Yes, more of this. Belittle the orange man. Call him small. Call him sad. Call him pathetic.
I really enjoyed the video calling Trump a chicken.