a bunch of assholes conected to each other... sounds about right.

I'd rather see the current logo added to Unicode than reuse an existing symbol. It's not impossible, considering that the Bitcoin symbol (₿) ended up making it.

What I'm hearing here is

Proposal to add current Fediverse symbol to Unicode

I like it because it reminds me of the Japanese kanji 森 Mori (Forest).

Which is in and of itself brilliant because it’s the kanji 木 Ki (Tree) repeated three times and bunched together.

Am I misunderstanding this - you want to replace a recognised symbol with a symbol that's already being used by another group? That seems counterproductive at best.

I'm also wondering, have you spoken to anyone with poor eyesight? This is my reply to a comment below suggesting that the new symbol would be easier to read:

I'm reading this thread on mobile, and the fediverse logo next to the community name is much easier to see than the three stars. If I didn't already know what the three stars were from the rest of the post, I wouldn't have a clue what they were supposed to be in the body. They look like a blurry capital A. Obviously the fediverse logo is bigger there, which helps, but it's not significantly bigger, and would still be clearer at a smaller size

It looks like a bunch of snowflakes, making it very representative.

EDIT Why change something that isn't broken?

Whoever decided that a logo should be standardised as Unicode? That is the worst criterion for picking a symbol that has and will have hundreds of other uses than inline text. If it's so important — work to have the current, pentacle fediverse symbol included in Unicode.

Registering a domain to introduce your dumb idea with a lot of empty bravado leaves you with ... an annual bill and a dumb idea. The pentacle symbol is so much more recognisable.

Stealing an icon already designated for something else? As is tradition

i like the gay satanism icon

Its use looks contrived to me on the linked GitHub page. The comparison with @ and # is flawed because those symbols are part of the resource name, whereas here the symbol is superfluous. It's like adding a 🌐 in front of every web URL.

Diaspora already use the symbol, to some extent. https://diasporafoundation.org/

Nah, It won't happen because you can't type it on a keyboard.

• ⛤
• ⛥
• ⛦
• ⛧
• ⬠
• ⭔

Edit: Or this lookalike 🝆

Can we use dog buttholes instead of cat buttholes

This looks like shit, is used for something else already, we already have an icon for the fediverse and this has 0 reason to exist

Testing a little side by side comparison

⁂

Why though? We don't need a symbol. Is it that hard to type "fediverse"? The fediverse logo is good enough.

What a bunch of snowflakes. I like the idea. This was my first thought though

First thought: e pluribus anus

Blech

There is no real dichotomy between the logo we have and the proposed typographical symbol. They have different uses, neither can really replace the other. Keep the established colourful Fediverse logo in visual layouts and when desired use the typographical symbol in text. It is natural that they won't be exactly the same symbol because they are designed for different needs; one is meant to look pretty and one is meant to read well as text.

I wrote about this on my blog. I like the notion and points made here, but I also think we're not helping by re-inventing things that already exist, so I'm torn on it. I have been happy with the existing one.