this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
39 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7188 readers
500 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago

Hey asshats, remember when this exact thing happened in the US and the result of binding arbitration was that safety was undermined? I'll bet the people of East Palestine remember.

Let's not make the same mistakes. Give the teamsters their damned fatigue protections, and pay them a good living wage.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I kinda have to agree with Singh on this one. It's hard to see this move as anything other than anti-worker

[–] jakob22 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Kinda proves the NDP are the only option for a pro-worker government. The Liberals won’t save us.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

If only the NDP had made electoral reform a part of their deal to support the liberals. None of the other parts of the deal mattered - they could easily do all that and more after winning the next election. But instead, we get a bunch of half measures and they don't have a chance at winning a majority.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ah, because you'll be offering workers a fair pay raise? Or because you're hoping the strike is ruled illegal and the plebs are forced back to work?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

No one can force them to work. CUPE called the government bluff in Ontario and they shat their pants. Unless you can rehire the whole org, you can't do shit and putting people behind bars or bankrupting them is gonna be a terrible idea.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago

Terrible decision

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I would continue to strike

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

They are actually locked out, not on strike.

[–] jakob22 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They could, but the railway companies would legally be allowed to fire and replace striking employees.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Good luck training 6000 more employees

[–] FireRetardant 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The railroads would just hire tons of foriegn workers and throw safety out the window to speed up training. And our government would let it happen because it is the "only way" to fix the strike.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

They are already doing that, just like every other industry.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Good luck with the next scandal

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

And less than 48 hours later... The union serves strike notice. These greedy fucks are going to get what's coming to them.

In the old days, greedy fucks who tried to break the union ended up getting dragged from their homes in the middle of the night and beaten to death on their front lawns, often in front of their families. So, like... That's your history lesson for the day.