this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
138 points (93.7% liked)

politics

18879 readers
4110 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris has narrowed her search for a vice presidential running mate to two finalists, Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, three sources with knowledge of the matter said on Monday.

Harris, the U.S. vice president, is expected to announce her selection by Tuesday, ahead of her first scheduled public appearance with her running mate in the evening at Temple University in Philadelphia.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CaptainKickass 103 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Walz has Bernie's seal of approval

That's all I need to know

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago (12 children)

indeed. Bernie remains a reasonably clean and reasonably clear assessor/signaler. he makes complex political decisions that much easier for voters.

going to miss the golden yardstick of his judgment when he finally bows out.

[–] CaptainKickass 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Unfortunately we'll probably never see the likes of him again

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

AOC is an excellent standard bearer for the Bernie style progressives.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

The bern-index

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] MagicCuboid 3 points 1 month ago

My friends in Minneapolis are pretty enamored with Walz. I don't think they'd be thrilled to have to share him haha

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 83 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Walz would be good, just please don't pick Shapiro. Can we avoid shooting ourselves in the foot for once? We've got a good thing going with Kamala.

[–] TimeChild 16 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Do you think Shapiro would lock down PA? I like Walz more from what I know, but seems MN is in the bag regardless. Can’t see the strategy side of his pick other than Walz seems to be the progressive favorite, and checks the old white male box.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago

I don't think he does lock down PA, his approval is solid but nothing crazy. And on top of that he has so many vulnerabilities. School vouchers and protest response, on top of old quotes being dredged out and the potential cover-up of sexual misconduct of one of his aides.

I would have looked at Kelly for his cheap points to score with low information voters (combat decorated Navy captain, astronaut), but Walz is also incredibly popular and has a good track record.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

Walz is more likely to deliver Wisconsin and maybe Michigan, which are also valuable. (And like the other commenter, I also question the ability of a VP pick to reliably deliver their home state.) Wisconsin seems to really like Walz as much as we do here in Minnesota. And I think he does well in Pennsylvania, Walz has the vibes of an older and more mellow version (but not as old as he looks, school lunchroom duty will age anyone) of what we all thought Fetterman would be. Walz is from a small town, is a former national guardsman and high school football coach, and iirc used to enjoy hunting. He appeals to working class, blue collar voters in ways very few other Democrats can. He's also involved with the national party (possibly the convention), someone on TikTok knew something was up with Biden just before he dropped out because Walz flew to DC to meet with Biden. The establishment Democrats like him and so do the progressives - he's exactly who we need right now.

Also, he's the reason we're all calling Republicans ​weird.

[–] Fredselfish 19 points 1 month ago (4 children)

She going choose Shapiro because DNC tells her too and fucking hurt her campaign. Goddammit for once do the right thing here Shaprio is a horrible choice that fucking none of us want. Hence why they pick him. Dumb fucking Democrats hate them.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

There are some impressively out of touch people making the calls in the democratic party.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] grue 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't think "running mate from state X will lock down state X" deserves as much credence as political parties give it in general.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Not based on historical data

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

I don't think Shapiro would lock PA. I think it's pretty likely she could pick him and lose the state or not pick him and win.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Nah, I highly doubt him being the VP pick could win the state alone. I think that Waltz is a better pick as a whole, including PA.

[–] ValorieAF 2 points 1 month ago

PA is already pretty firmly blue-purple. WI is more an uncertain purple.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

We definitely need any help we can get with PA. If PA goes blue that opens up a few avenues to the White House. Without it I think the only route is taking every single other swing state. Or maybe a surprise flip of a red state.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It’s gotta be Walz. Shapiro would be a slap in the face to the Arab-American community, which we all very much need the support of if we want to prevent the fascists from winning the presidency.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EnderWiggin 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I wanted Kelly, but I'd be pretty happy with Walz. Shapiro would just take the wind out of the sails.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Harris closed out her search by interviewing three top candidates - Walz, Shapiro and U.S. Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona - at her Naval Observatory residence on Sunday, the sources said.

Kelly caused a stir on Sunday night when he posted on X "Now, my mission is serving Arizonans," which was interpreted as a sign he was no longer in the running. He deleted the post and replaced it with "I've learned that when your country asks you to serve, you always answer the call."

Sounds like nothing's official yet about eliminating Kelly. I think he'd be the best choice as well

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I really like Kelly, too. I think there was just a lot of risk involved with pulling an incumbent Democratic Senator in a swing state that could potentially give an extra seat to the Republicans in an election year that's already difficult for the Democrats on the Senate side.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] EnderWiggin 3 points 1 month ago

And the more I read the more fired up I get. I have liked Walz for a while but just been spending more time reading deeper into his background, experience, and policy positions. Feels like he'll really help drive the campaign and align to a lot of the wider progressive objectives.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago

Walz to win; or Shapiro to lock up at AIPAC money.

Hmm.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's going to be fucking Josh Shapiro. sigh

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thesporkeffect 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

She already said the announcement will take place in Philly, so ... 😮‍💨

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ikidd 10 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Democrat hacks will push Shapiro because its the worst choice.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

She chose Walz

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] dhork 7 points 1 month ago

I would'd have a problem with either. But "Harris/Shapiro" sounds like a personal injury law firm, while "Harris/Walz" sounds like some political consultant firm.

Either is better than "Trump/Vance", which just sounds weird.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For those like me, who had never heard of Tim Walz until recently, here's an August 2, 2024 episode of the Ezra Klein podcast with an interview: https://pod.link/1548604447

[–] bitchkat 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Walz has been amazing and the amount of progressive laws that have been passed in MN in the past two years with a 1 vote majority in the state house is ridiculous. This doesn't even scratch the surface but

  1. Recreational weed
  2. Mandatory sick time accrual -- my company had to give those of us in MN one or two additional sick days,
  3. Free school lunches
  4. Banning of non-competes (still important due to the recent supreme court ruling that limits the ability of federal agencies to set regulations)
  5. Reproductive rights

https://mn.gov/governor/accomplishments/accomplishments.jsp

We're certainly going to miss him as governor but he will be an amazing VP.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

On the first I thought Christoph Waltz. Even if not possible, this would be a magnificent choice! 🦷

[–] Rapidcreek 2 points 1 month ago

I don't care who it is. It's time.

load more comments
view more: next ›