this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
71 points (96.1% liked)

movies

1773 readers
157 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

They are (apparently in no particular order):

  • Barbarella (Roger Vadim, 1968)
  • Piranha 3DD (John Gulager, 2012)
  • Alien vs. Predator: Requiem (The Brothers Strause, 2007)
  • Highlander II: The Quickening (Russell Mulcahy, 1991)
  • Roller Blade (Donald G. Jackson, 1986)
  • 2012 (Roland Emmerich, 2009)
  • Superbabies: Baby Geniuses 2 (Bob Clark, 2004)
  • Mac and Me (Stewart Raffill, 1988)
  • Battlefield Earth (Roger Christian, 2000)
  • After Earth (M Night Shyamalan, 2013)
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Barbarella is campy fun, I wouldn't call it bad.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

I was pretty bored by it except for the sex bits (I was a teenager).

[–] ikidd 25 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Gentlemen, I would submit to you, as worst SF movie ever... The Core

[–] carlyman 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I give you all my up votes. I've said this not even halfway into the movie and it's still true today.

[–] ikidd 2 points 3 months ago

Same, I kept watching just to see how horrendously terrible it could get. It didn't disappoint.

20 years later, I still have it pop up in my head right away as the worst SF movie I've ever seen.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

I had forgotten that I had watched it. I'm all out of brain bleach, dammit.

[–] Yankee_Self_Loader 3 points 3 months ago

There is no way that The Core is worse than Moonfall. I mean… it’s not good… but at least it’s fun and has Stanley Tucci in it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Second that.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear 24 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Let me introduce everyone to Sharks of the Corn. It makes Battlefield Earth look like Citizen Kane.

[–] Intrama 7 points 3 months ago

Oh.. my.. 🤣

[–] Drunemeton 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

“2012” was the movie that gave my hubs his best line ever (about 20 minutes from the end), “This movie could have stopped about five endings ago…”

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

If I had editing skills, I would remove the bit where they are underwater trying to get the ship door closed.. I didn’t mind it except for that bit

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Some of those are a given (Highlander 2, Battlefield Earth) but others suggest they need to watch more movies.

I'd also include:

  • League of Extraordinary Gentlemen (2003)
  • Cosmic Sin (2021) and Anti-Life (2020) - I understand the context but that doesn't stop them from being shit
  • Alone in the Dark (2005) - screw Uwe Boll
  • Monster (2008)
  • Disaster Movie (2008)
  • Brazilian Star Wars (1978)
  • Doghouse (2008) - punchable
  • Most mockbusters, especially the Atlantic Rim ones
[–] reddig33 6 points 3 months ago

Still waiting for whichever studio owns the rights to LGX to make a tv series out of it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

LXG should have been good. It's amazing they managed to make such a bad movie with that premise.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

It took itself seriously. I read the comics and they're awesome because they are so over the top.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

What was the context?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Monster (2008)

I double checked this one. The weird thing is, Cloverfield was released as Monstro in Russia and Ukraine, Project: Monster in Poland, Monstrous in Romania and Bulgaria. I've yet to hear why, but I guess it's eastern european distributors rightfully thought this name would be more telling of what's presented in the movie.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

2012! Did they not watch Moonfall, it made 2012 look like Shakespeare.

[–] shalafi 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Unapologetic Alien fan here. Alien vs. Predator: Requiem is awful. Watched it a couple of times, still can't remember what it's about.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I was just thinking that I think I've probably seen that, but don't remember anything about it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Take the love story from Battleship, then make all the characters the dumbest college age kids you can think of, then sprinkle in a couple of Xenomorphs and Predators doing the world a favor.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The fourth item on the list, they're referring to a film that doesn't actually exist, never has and never will exist.

The Highlander series went straight from 1 to 3 due to a historical accident.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The Highlander series ended after 1 movie. After all, there can be only one 🙂

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

wow. I had no idea they never made highlander 1 or 3

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

2012 is one of my favourite movies. I don’t care what this author thinks, I love that movie. It’s fun, over the top, and enjoyable. I’m not watching it for some science-accurate portrayal of the end of the world. I’m watching it for the entertaining destruction, and this movie hits it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Yea it's not strictly a "good" movie. But yes it's fun as hell to watch. Definitely up there near the top of my favorites in the disaster movie genre.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

Barbarella is freaking awesome and I'll fight over that.

It is, however, bad sci-fi. Great movie, just not really sci-fi in the important ways.

[–] Imperor 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Recently got into watching older SciFu from the 70s/80s and a chatter on stream suggested "Star Crash" which is very hard to find apparently, had to get it off eBay.

It is basically if some kid watched Star Wars and said "What is this? I can do better than this!" And made it again but 100x worse. It's really awful but in the good kind of way. Even the editing is terrible, there are cuts that make no sense, etc. But it has David Hasslehoff in it!

Haven't watched the second one yet, but I am delighted to see what they tried to rip off for that one.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Star Crash is one of the more competent Star Wars rip-offs or cash-ins and is good cheesy fun - Brazilian Star Wars is terrible, Turkish Star Wars us deranged.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

so we're just ignoring straight to VHS and straight to Netflix then?

let me introduce you to Alien Intruder

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don’t understand how they can say “overly sexualised voyages into space” and not include Galaxy of Terror. The worm rape scene that didn’t need to be in the movie and Corman forced back in makes it a much better contender for the slot Barbarella is in. On a script, camp, and exploitation level it is worse in every way and it’s even a ripoff of Alien to boot, arguably making it worse than Alien v Predator: Requiem which at least tries to be original.

I own it on laserdisc. The only reason I’ve seen it more than once is because people are surprised Sid Haig and Robert Englund did a movie together. It’s fucking bad and holy shit is the worm rape scene the fucking peak of Corman being a misogynistic, exploitative walnut. To be totally frank it really disgusts me that he still gets a platform (legacy) after forcing this scene into the movie and directing it himself, even if some people think it contributed to the movie’s commercial success.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

even if some people think it contributed to the movie’s commercial success.

Was it a commercial success?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

According to movie commentary, depends on who you talk to. Wikipedia lists the budget as 1.8mil and a box office of either 4mil or 1.3mil so it’s kinda unclear what the truth is.

[–] Poayjay 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Battlefield earth is one of my favorite awful movies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Trying to watch it gave me a headache with all those camera angles

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Battlefield Earth is a masterpiece fight me

[–] Burn_The_Right 9 points 3 months ago

Isn't that the scientology movie?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

oh god. after earth was shyamalan. I just lost a bit more respect for the man.

[–] Godric 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A part of me must beg: Where Eragon???

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Godric 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Another part of me must beg: Why can't I read??

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Mac and Me? Someone tell Paul Rudd.