this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
410 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2356 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] just_another_person 174 points 4 months ago (1 children)

God damn I can't wait til Twatter finally fucking crumbles. STOP. USING. IT.

[–] ripcord 23 points 3 months ago

But some musician I like only uses it so I have no choice or whatever bullshit

[–] EleventhHour 151 points 4 months ago (4 children)

It hurt Ewon’s feewings thiiiiiiiis much!

[–] ours 47 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So much for "Free speach absolutist". More like just wanting to give hate groups a voice.

[–] Stovetop 20 points 4 months ago

Wouldn't expect anything less from someone who directly benefitted from Apartheid in South Africa.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago

Yea, such a snowflake smh

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago

Don't touch my monstah twuck

[–] GladiusB 1 points 3 months ago

Let's be honest, it's probably not that big

[–] [email protected] 114 points 4 months ago (3 children)

So from the outside, this is looking like an increasingly difficult situation for anyone left of trump still on twitter ... whatever you like about the platform ... it seems you're actively supporting and endorsing some pretty sketchy behaviour.

[–] paddirn 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It isn’t, “facts” or “reality” have never really bothered those people before.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He's referring to Twitter users in general. There are people who I genuinely think care about facts and reality still left on Twitter.

[–] whostosay 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well, they don't fuckin care too much do they

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's pretty disappointing.

I like the take that if you're still on Twitter it doesn't mean you're a fascist; it just means fascism isn't a deal breaker for you.

[–] whostosay 5 points 4 months ago

If you're helping the nazi bar pay rent with your time and money, you're still a nazi, you just don't get as many perks.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I finally deactivated my account after I heard they were turning on Grok by default.

But, I hadn't tweeted (switched to Mastodon) since Elmu mass-banned journalists for retweeting public information (jet location when near an airport).

I know some non-fascists are still getting good use out of it, but I can't participate anymore. I keep hearing that Mastodon is letting too much abuse through to marginalized people -- even more than Twitter -- though. So, I don't know what to recommend for microblogging.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Mastodon is letting too much abuse through to marginalized people – even more than Twitter – though. So, I don’t know what to recommend for microblogging.

Yea it’s a bit tough ATM. Straddling between masto and BlueSky might make sense (many are doing it it seems).

[–] [email protected] 35 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] lemmus 12 points 4 months ago

Let’s hope so!

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Washington Post Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

Washington Post is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

Bias: Left-Center
Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/washington-post/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.

Footer

Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.

Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

[–] Robsadaisy 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Love this good little bot!!

[–] CharlesDarwin 20 points 3 months ago

But the FREEZED PEACH. And the MARKETPLACE OF IDEAS.

Are we saying that weird Elon doesn't actually support these things?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

why are we using/caring about it again?

[–] [email protected] 60 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Because the richest guy on the planet bought one of the most popular social networks, now runs it as a massive right-wing propaganda machine, and ignoring it isn't going to make it go away or stop mattering.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

so why is 'white dude for harris' not on mastodon, instagram, bluesky or whatever the alternative is instead?

twitter, as you say yourself is not a useable source of information or platform for people not on the nazi part of the political spectrum.

its not like a public space we can take over. musk has all the control over who even gets seen.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Likely because those are vastly under populated compared to Xitter. When running promo, you have to go where the people are sadly. It's harder to make people come to you.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

does it matter if they get banned anyway?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Because it's an election and X has hundreds of millions of monthly active users. It would be irresponsible not to campaign where there are people.

Again, ignoring the existence of X won't make X go away or stop mattering.

its not like a public space we can take over. musk has all the control over who even gets seen.

Yeah, and when he uses that power to manipulate the gigantic captive audience he bought, we should call him out on it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

Because those are unfortunately fringe tech, with Fringe user numbers (relatively speaking)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

I thought it was founded on Mastodon. At least that's where I heard about it, 5 days or so before the fundraising call on Monday.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago

Ignoring hyper-spoiled man-children and their fancy toys is EXACTLY how you deal with those types...

Also, by ignoring it you cut out any ad revenue you would otherwise be generating for them.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

Lonnie is a little child in a soft man's body. If only he'd go the fuck away.

[–] jve 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Twitter. Or, Twitter is its deadname. I think it's ironic since Musk deadnames trans people intentionally because he's a mega-transphobe. X will never be anything other than "Twitter".