this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
372 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19241 readers
3004 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sanders said that the recent, brazen push by billionaires to influence Vice President Kamala Harris to dump Khan from her hypothetical presidential cabinet is yet another show of the corrupting influence of money in politics.

“Here’s why we have to overturn Citizens United & end Big Money in politics: Billionaire Reid Hoffman donated $7 million to the Harris campaign. Now, he wants her, as president, to fire an outstanding members [sic] of the Biden Administration, FTC Chair Lina Khan,” Sanders said in a post on social media on Thursday. “Not acceptable.”

In recent days, billionaires and large Democratic donors have been speaking out against Khan, who represents a threat to corporate interests.

LinkedIn cofounder Reid Hoffman — a venture capitalist deeply enmeshed with corporate interests — came out publicly against Khan in an interview with CNN this week, likening Khan’s efforts to rein in corporate abuses as a “war” on corporate power. Hoffman, who campaign filings show has donated $7 million to Harris’s campaign, outright said he “would hope that Vice President Harris would replace her.”

[…]

Another billionaire, Barry Diller, chairman of holding company IAC, also brazenly announced that he would mount a lobbying effort against Khan for her crackdowns in an interview with CNBC. Diller has pledged to donate the maximum amount to Harris’s campaign, called Khan a “dope” and said that he would lobby Harris to dump Khan.

[…]

Many other similar missives from donors have come anonymously, with one donor telling The New York Times that Harris is open to the idea. The Harris campaign has said that it has not had discussions about Khan’s future so far — though Wall Street donors have been pushing Democrats to drop Khan for months.

[…]

The replacement of Khan on the cabinet would be a major loss for backers of the antitrust movement; her appointment by Biden as FTC chair was lauded as a significant step forward for the administration’s purported efforts to take on increasing corporate power.

Under Khan, the FTC has taken on some of the largest corporations in America, including tech giants like Amazon, Microsoft and Meta, pharmaceutical giants like Amgen, and other giants like Kroger. It also created a new rule banning employers from including noncompete clauses in worker contracts, a move that the agency said would raise worker wages by $300 billion annually.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 89 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I didn't know who this was until this story broke. Now she's one of my favorite people in the Biden administration.

[–] Viking_Hippie 9 points 4 months ago

Me neither! Reminds me of a Duck Sauce song for some reason 😉

[–] SacredHeartAttack 55 points 4 months ago

This woman has quietly been a hero for all of us the entire time she’s been in that office. She better not be going anywhere.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Fuck those ghouls with a rusty train spike. I'll donate to Harris every month until election if she tells them to fuck all the way off! It might be only $25 a month, but that is like halfway to $7m.

[–] dogsnest 22 points 4 months ago

Fuck those ghouls with a rusty train spike.

I like this.
Will find a spot in the rotation.

[–] anon6789 34 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

For those wondering about a list of what all IAC Holdings holds:

  • Allrecipes
  • Angi
  • Ask Applications
  • Ask Media Group
  • Better Homes & Gardens
  • Brides
  • Byrdie
  • Care.com
  • CraftJack
  • EatingWell
  • Entertainment Weekly
  • Fixd Repair
  • Food + Wine
  • Handy
  • Health
  • HomeAdvisor
  • HomeStars (Canada)
  • IAC Films
  • ImproveNet
  • Instapro (Italy)
  • InStyle
  • Investopedia
  • Lifewire
  • Liquor.com
  • Martha Stewart Living
  • mHelpDesk
  • MNI Targeted Media
  • Mosaic Group
  • MyBuilder (United Kingdom)
  • MyDomaine
  • MyHammer (Germany, Austria)
  • Newco
  • People
  • People en Español
  • Real Simple
  • Serious Eats
  • Shape
  • Simply Recipes
  • Southern Living
  • The Balance
  • The Daily Beast
  • The Spruce
  • ThoughtCo
  • Travaux.com (France)
  • Travel + Leisure
  • TreeHugger
  • TripSavvy
  • Verywell
  • Vivian Health
  • Werkspot (Netherlands)

Crazy history of buys/sells on the full wiki article including CollegeHumor, Ticketmaster, SyFy, Expedia, and more.

[–] pahlimur 27 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So it's one of the companies contributing to the dying diversity online. Almost all of these websites and services have become awful without adblock or require a paid account.

[–] anon6789 10 points 4 months ago

Largely so. I'm not aware of any holding company that really goes for quality and diversity over the get more for less approach, but it could be possible.

If you haven't looked at the linked wiki, I encourage you to do so. I'm not sure if they're just pretty good at picking winners or they just have deep enough pockets to only buy decent brands, but there are definitely some still solid names in the portfolio.

Allrecipes in the one in the list I'm not ready to give up on, but others like Investopedia, and to an extent The Spruce have been ok places, but I've got better alternatives to.

From a pure business sense, I hate this guy a little less than I was expecting to, and I'm sure he's trashed more things on sites I've enjoyed than he's improved, but he at least seems halfway intelligent.

That said, if a guy like him hates Khan, then I'm behind her even more , if that's possible. She hasn't had the greatest success so far, but I love her philosophy and spirit, and if she can stay around, she could grow into something amazing in trust busting. The world desperately needs more people like her.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago

Thank you so much for posting this article. Shedding light on the serious problem of oligarchs is very important.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago (2 children)

"War on corporate power"... Finally a just war I can get behind! No need for the draft, I'll volunteer.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In 3 points 4 months ago

The side you fight on depends on the size of your 401k.

[–] Jumi 2 points 4 months ago

Burn corpo shit!

[–] mycodesucks 11 points 4 months ago
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 6 points 4 months ago

Lina Khan is my favorite part of the Biden administration and I'll be disappointed if they get rid of her.

Then again, my favorite Secretary of Energy of all time only lasted a year so maybe cabinet members I like have the same problem as TV shows I like, which is that nobody else likes them.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver 3 points 4 months ago

CU really is horrible for the country. I'm truly hoping the "Dem Hype" train keeps rolling. So much crap needs to be reversed, replaced, codified, etc..

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker 1 points 4 months ago

CNN Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

CNN is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

Bias: Left-Center
Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cnn/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News

New York Times Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

New York Times is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

Bias: Left-Center
Factual Reporting: High
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-times/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News

The American Prospect Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

The American Prospect is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

Bias: Left
Factual Reporting: High
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-american-prospect/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News

TruthOut Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [Medium] (Click to view Full Report)

TruthOut is rated with Medium Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

Bias: Left
Factual Reporting: Mixed
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/truth-out/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.

Footer

Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.

Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.