this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
44 points (80.6% liked)

politics

19232 readers
3777 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Democrat declined to directly answer when asked if Biden has her support.

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks 19 points 5 months ago (2 children)

She's three years older than Biden...

She also should have been retired a decade ago. And she's not going to say Biden has to retire because people will say she needs to

Like, these prideful assholes never retire, then have the balls to say no one younger than them has "the experience"...

There's only so many fucking seats in our government. Younger people can't get "the experience" because you fucks won't retire when you should, then you claim you're helpless and can't retire.

I don't know if they're fucking with us because they know we don't have a say in it. Or if they really don't understand they're causing the fucking problem that they use as an excuse.

It's like cops when they say "it's just a bad apple, nothing to do". They won't say "throw out the bad apple" because they're also a bad apple and they want to stay in the barrel

[–] dhork 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

She was at least aware enough to realize she doesn't have the energy anymore to lead the Caucus, and let someone younger take over the Democratic House leadership. She probably still has Jeffries' ear whenever she wants, but he makes all the hard choices now.

I am sure that if Biden were to resign tomorrow, President Harris would carve out an advisory role for him. Maybe he can man the Red Phone between 10AM and 4 PM.

[–] dogsnest 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

"Biden is too old! (78)"
-- GOP 2020

"Trump is great! (78)"
--GOP 2024

[–] dhork 6 points 5 months ago

We've discussed this in other threads, the difference is in expectations. Trump in 2024 gives a better performance than Biden did in 2020, or now.

In fairness, it is a lot easier to sound convincing and give a good performance when you don't have to stick to the truth. But Trump's supporters don't want the truth, they want the convenient fictional world Trump is good at selling.

[–] Ghostalmedia 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

As anyone with aging parents knows, age isn’t just a number. I have a mother in law in her mid 80’s who is running circles around my mother in her mid 70’s. Mentally, physically, sadly my mom is simply hitting those aging milestones sooner and harder.

That’s not to say Trump isn’t an old incoherent POS, or that he’s not dangerous AF, but Biden does remind a lot of us of parents that have deteriorated pretty hard.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

My theory is also that Trump's loose connection with reality and already weird mannerisms makes it much harder to recognize when he's losing it. He can just go off on a tangent about sharks and electric boats and people just say "that's Trump being Trump" rather than "uhhh, grandpa, you were giving a political speech". If he forgets the next word he was going to say, he just starts a whole new thought about a movie he watched recently or something completely made up, and none of the things he says were factual in the first place, so making a mistake on the details is impossible.

[–] dhork 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

There definitely seems to be a complicated dance going on right now behind the scenes. Most Democrats are going to publically back Biden even as they try privately to get him to leave. But it seems to be members of Congress, particularly from safe seats, who are the most vocal right now. (It surprised me to learn that Pelosi is running again, at the age of 84.) Pelosi can do anything short of killing a puppy and still get elected in SF.

It makes some sense, as Biden is polling significantly behind most Congressional races right now. One would think that means that Biden's baggage is not affecting those races, but maybe they have polling that indicates that there are several close races that might get a bump if Biden leaves. These Democrats in safe congressional seats will have a much harder time of the next two years if they are in the minority because Biden cost them a bunch of close seats. And, if a Trump victory is coupled with Republicans keeping the House and taking the Senate, who do you think Trump will use his newfound regal powers on first?

It is essential that Democrats keep some check on a future Trump Presidency, and they can't do that if Biden is pulling down Democratic enthusiasm enough to risk all those close races.

[–] cabron_offsets 7 points 5 months ago

At some point, hopefully soon, we gotta find our balls and do what’s right and necessary.

[–] Rapidcreek 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Here are the headlines from Rep. Nancy Pelosi’s (D-CA) remarks on Morning Joe earlier today:

New York Times: Pelosi suggests that Biden should reconsider decision to stay in the race

Washington Post: Pelosi urges Biden to make decision on race, despite his insistence he will stay 

USA Today: Nancy Pelosi dodges question of whether she wants Biden to be the Democratic nominee

CNBC: Pelosi refuses to say she supports Biden as the Democratic nominee 

Ha! Pelosi knows exactly what she's doing.

[–] dhork 5 points 5 months ago

David Tennant in Doctor Who

Don't you think he looks tired?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

~~Cheshire~~ Pelosi cat

Sounds most like, we have to keep supporting him publicly in case he stays in the race but on the dl we think we would have better chances with someone else.

[–] Rapidcreek 1 points 5 months ago

What is the difference between Pelosi being uncommitted and the "I'm concerned" fuddy-duddy that some democratic senators throw around?

[–] Cosmicomical 1 points 5 months ago

"Whatever he decides to do" seems pretty committed to me

[–] Pronell 0 points 5 months ago

Love the massive respect that suddenly comes Pelosi's way once she's useful again.

[–] retrospectology 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

To quote Malcolm Tucker: "As useless as a marzipan dildo."

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

How is this parasite still alive..

JFC, will these people ever die or are we destined to be ruled by geriatric nepo babies until I am also gereatric?

Asking for a friend

[–] CharlesDarwin -2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

He should just accelerate this slow-rolling disaster and step down now.

[–] TokenBoomer 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I disagree. Embrace the chaos, and starve Trump and the fascists from the media. Imagine how exciting and inspiring it will be to have Kamala Harris get the nomination at the convention. Keep the Repugs off-balance.

IMO, the decision has already been made. Right now, they’re just shoring up funding and support. They know he can’t gain in the polls, so he can’t win. I suspect they’re testing Harris to take over, and strategizing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

That’s not what anyone is saying or asking for