this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
1110 points (94.9% liked)

Political Memes

5416 readers
4649 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 131 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Obviously the democrats are more corrupt because they're getting away with all of their crimes /s

[–] TexasDrunk 43 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's funny, the guy below you at the time of my reply is basically saying that without the /s.

By the way, nice to see you again!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 65 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Careful, you’ll upset the propagandists.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 4 months ago (3 children)

how bout I take a propa ganda at them honkers

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This isn’t even my style of humor but that’s fucking funny

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 months ago

I honestly have no clue why I posted this

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

That was pretty good.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Snapz 44 points 4 months ago (3 children)

There's only one thing the gop loves more than LOUD projection and that's abusing kids. The party of the grand ol' pedophiles


  • NOTE: I'm reaching the character limit on Reddit posts, so here's a website with a list of about 1000 of these republican shit stains on humanity.
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I'm reaching the character limit on Reddit posts

Reeeeee

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Blagojevich maybe? I’m not sure exactly what we’re measuring here.

Who, by the way, was pardoned. Want to guess who pardoned him?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

I'm pretty sure IL had more corrupt governors before Blagojevich so I don't think it's including them.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

I don’t know but I’m betting that they were voted in by the great state of New Jersey.

[–] Kayday 27 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Is this all elected officials? I'm confused where these numbers are coming from.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago

They're coming directly from a well meaning individual's asshole

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's only federal numbers and I think they might be a few years out of date but I'm too lazy to check.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

If this were up to date, it would absolutely list a criminal president

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Looks like only federal to me but idk.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 months ago

Every US president I remember was a (war) criminal. But it's not about the individuals, but rather the systemic changes enacted.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago (4 children)

As a non-american just watching the democratic shitshow I can't believe why on earth there are only two parties. If the parties are fucked up, build a new one. That's what democracy is made for.

Macrons party in France was fresh up from the ground at his first election.

PS. I'm aware that France is a bad example actually, but the fact about his party is still true.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

First past the post elections. If we had ranked choice or runoff elections, more parties would appear.

Instead, in FPTP, every vote that is not for one of the two highest-polling candidates is objectively a wasted vote. Game theory dictates that the only rational choice is a vote for one of those two candidates, since the possibility of a third party gaining enough votes to win in any single election is nearly infinitesimal. So instead of many parties, all candidates self-sort into one of the two viable parties. Any candidate that does not is a protest candidate or deluded, but in either case, there is no hope of actually winning.

So what about primaries? The primary system decides the candidates, but even that is tainted by FPTP, because primary voters have to guess which will perform better in a FPTP general election and often vote against their ideal candidate in the hopes of winning (or, not losing) the general.

In short, until we structurally reform elections to be ranked/STAR/runoff/etc to remove the punitive effect of voting for your actual ideal candidate, we're stuck with a prisoner's dilemma election every time.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

As a non-american just watching the democratic shitshow I can’t believe why on earth there are only two parties.

In a lot of cases, there's only one real functioning party. Smaller states and gerrymandered districts tend to have a single dominant party and a secondary dissident party, with the dominant party controlling all the statewide offices and most of the legislative seats, while the dissident party controls some number of municipal seats where they have a local majority.

Macrons party in France was fresh up from the ground at his first election.

Macron spun En Marche out of the collapsed ruin of Hollande's Socialist Party (*) (for whom he was deputy secretary general until Hollande's ouster). He was more akin to Lincoln's Republicans (who emerged from the wrecked carcass of the American Whig Party) or Theodore Roosevelt's Bull Moose Party (which might as well have been Republicans For Roosevelt Party, given how badly Wilson rocked both him and Taft).

(*) don't get too existed. they were pretty thin on actual socialism.

Le Penn's National Front has a real foundation (of French fascists) that existed before she started mobilizing the party and will stick around after she's gone. Similarly the New Popular Front (not to be confused with The People's Front of Judea rimshot) has a broad coalition of support that transcends any one leader. Both are more in line with a traditional American party.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They are not the same, the republicans are the psychopath shooting up a classroom of kids, and the democrats are the Uvalde cops tasing those that try to stop it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pastabatman 15 points 4 months ago

I have no idea if these numbers are correct. For me I don't need any history though. One party is standing behind a guy who has been charged with 91 felony counts in four different jurisdictions and convicted of 34 and counting, and that's just for stuff he did while in office or as a candidate. He attempted a coup. He fomented a terrorist attack on the Capitol. Still, the Republicans are like, "Yep, that's our guy!" all while the Democrats tear themselves apart over Biden being old and doing old person things. Yeah it would be nice to have a better option for president, but this is not a difficult decision.

Please vote, friends!

[–] Agent641 15 points 4 months ago (3 children)

The meaning is clear. Dems only have 3 short years in which to rack up a fuckload of crimes, if they want to beat the GOP.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BeatTakeshi 15 points 4 months ago

Oh so the party of law and order was meaning the party that keeps law enforcement busy

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I'm actually confused because I know Jesse Jackson Jr. did a prions sentence of 2 and a half years for wire and mail fraud and Anthony Weiner did 18 months for sexual offenses. Frank Ballance was sentanced to 4 years for money laundering and mail fraud and William J. Jefferson was sentanced to 13 years for bribery. Jim Traficant was sentanced to 8 years for financial corruption. Which one of these is the 1 prison sentence?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Who knows? There's no citation as far as I can tell.

Its not like we don't have Bob Menendez pending trial for smuggling gold bars down his pant legs or Henry Cueller queued up for $600k in bribery charges (both of which are apparently fine, according to the GOP aligned SCOTUS...)

But you're really scraping the bottom of the barrel when your case for a 2024 candidate slate requires you to call back to the Keating Five and Abscam.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] neclimdul 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah well you didn't include tan suit scandals so it doesn't count

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] retrospectology 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They're not the same, but they do work together to thwart the will and prosperity of the people. The game wouldn't work if they were exactly the same.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hikermick 8 points 4 months ago

This isn't true. Off the top of my head I can think of at least two democrats who've been sentenced to prison. I vote democratic party 99% of the time and I don't disagree with the premise but I don't want like-minded folks going around with bad info

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt 8 points 4 months ago

Diarrhea and constipation are on separate ends of the scale. But both are the same in that they are shit, and no one wants them.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Because Latin America gets fucked over either way

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Both parties are capitalist and support First Past the Post voting in the states they control.

Of course there are differences, don't you want more differences?

Think the Republicans getting control in government is a existential threat? Then you should be open to using every and any tool available to fight this from becoming reality. That means taking a big gulp, and considering that perhaps the democrats don't have what it takes to take on the Republicans.

So democrats need backup! They need help out there on that debate stage to fight Trump. We need to bring in outside perspectives with fresh ideas in the form of more viable political parties in the voting booth.

This means we must do away with First Past The Post voting in each and every state in democratic control. Republican ones as well, but at the very least they have an excuse as to why they use a mathematically flawed voting system that doesn't represent everyone. What is the excuse blue states?

Time to set aside your pride democrats. Perhaps you really aren't the future in the USA. You do want a future in the United States of America right? Would you be willing to risk your beloved democratic party not being relevant any longer to save this nation? I'd say, thats going to happen either way. Either the Republicans win it all, or we find a way around this massive blue roadblock of a political party.

So you may as well do the right thing, and implement Ranked Choice voting in your state before the door hits you on the ass on your way out.

Political parties are not the USA, the people are. We can set ourselves free with state level electoral reform. Now.

[–] SleezyDizasta 5 points 4 months ago (5 children)

This is pretty meaningless if it doesn't include which levels are counted. Is this just congress? Is it the national level? Does this include the state and local levels? Without proper context this turns from an insightful piece of information to propaganda.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

So that makes Republicans more attractive to some people

load more comments
view more: next ›