this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
168 points (84.1% liked)

Technology

55642 readers
3600 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 days ago

Can I worry about the fact the most serious AI's are owned by large companies, and that they are being taught to replace artists, writers and creatives?

What a sad fucking dystopia we live in.

[–] Eldritch 149 points 3 days ago (2 children)

That should be enough to worry anybody.

[–] Cryan24 30 points 3 days ago

From the guy who said 640Kb is enough for anyone..

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 127 points 3 days ago (10 children)

Bill Gates says the massive power draw required for AI processing is nothing to worry about as AI will ultimately identify ways to help cut power consumption and drive the transition to sustainable energy.

The final solution the AI comes up with: Cut the power of the poor, euthanize the old and weak.

[–] Wogi 51 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If it were actually AI I might have some faith.

This isn't a neural net processor, not a learning computer. It's a fucking mechanical Turk. A bad one.

What he's talking about isn't capable of deriving new ideas. It's just going to spit out shit it's seen already.

The library of Babel is just as likely to give us the answers he's talking about. More likely maybe because it's at least already written down.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

I wonder if all this is to burn enough energy to make ignorant people believe that we have AI. And then use that AI as a justification of the existing order of things, the same way "civil contract" is. That it's not really technical, but rather a very big and expensive propaganda campaign for abolishing democracies.

[–] mumblerfish 12 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Wow, that is so dumb. I saw some crack pot dude trying to solve unsolved physics problems by using prompts like "imagine you are Einstein, then how would you solve: ...". Good to see he is not alone, but has Bill fucking Gates with similarly dumb AI takes.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago

And make paperclips.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Dead wrong. AI is not as reliable as their makers would like to believe. AI is more likely to adopt all the flaws of humanity than make anything “better.” A subjective term.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

It's a text generator. All these people, were they to live in Antiquity, would jump ship to ship trying to visit every oracle and prophet in the Mediterranean asking questions about universe and seeking deep meaning in short texts of the Chinese fortune cookie kind.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 days ago

Ricky says Bill Gates needs to shut the fuck up. You have thousands of times more money than any human will ever need leave the rest of us alone you fucking demon.

[–] [email protected] 70 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Bill Gates says the massive power draw required for AI processing is nothing to worry about as AI will ultimately identify ways to help cut power consumption and drive the transition to sustainable energy.

We already know how

[–] mutant_zz 35 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, this is one of the many things that annoys me about AI discourse.

"We can use it to solve climate change!"

We already technically know how to solve climate change, but politics makes doing that impossible.

And, no, AI can't "fix" politics. We're going to have to figure that out by ourselves.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Climate scientists: "do these things to fix climate change"
Everyone: "but that's HAAARD and I don't wanna!"
AI developers: create AI
Climate scientists: "AI is drawing massive power accelerating climate change, we need to stop that"
Everyone: "but it can tell us how to fix climate change so it's going to be okay!"
AI climate model: "do these same things to fix climate change"
Everyone: "but that's HAAARD and I don't wanna!"

Yeah, I can't see any way this could possibly fail...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Contravariant 19 points 3 days ago

In a way AI refusing to recommend using so much computing power on LLMs could well be the first sign of actual intelligence.

[–] Tronn4 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Ai told my power company to tell us to stop using energy during the day beucase ai needs the power to do the power co.pqnies jobs

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AWittyUsername 16 points 2 days ago

Oh Gates what a lovely altruistic human billionaire.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Zangoose 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If he was counting his money in $100 bills it would still take him about 40 years,

Edit: assuming he counts 1 $100 bill per second

[–] Phegan 50 points 3 days ago

Mr anti climate change says not to worry when it benefits him.

Fuck bill gates, fucking nepo-baby

[–] AbidanYre 81 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

640kW should be enough for anyone.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well as long as Bill says it's cool, I guess I don't have to form my own opinion

[–] JoeKrogan 30 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We should at least hear what Ja Rule has to say

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] masquenox 22 points 3 days ago

Of all the celebrity billionaire parasites this one is the one I hate the most. At least Elon and Bezos has the decency to show us what scumbags they are... they don't call Gates "No.1 Sugar Daddy To The PR industry" for nothing.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So if we light the planet on fire to fuel the AI, the AI will then tell us how to put the fire out.

Okay sure, but how about we just... don't do any of that?

[–] RonnyZittledong 17 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The AI solution will be to stop producing food. That would save enormous amounts of energy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LovingHippieCat 56 points 3 days ago

Breaking: Rich tech guy thinks that the energy draw from rich tech projects is nothing to worry about.

[–] MisterMoo 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Okay thanks Bill, I won’t.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Alright, but if I end up getting stuffed in a goo-filled pod so the AI can suck my energy out through a massive plug in the back of my head, I'm gonna be pretty upset.

[–] telllos 7 points 3 days ago

It's not going to be in the back of your head.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago

I say shut up.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 3 days ago

Bill Gates shouldn't worry about people wanting to make a tent from his skin.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 days ago

Oh, gotcha. So crypto mining is bad, because he can't make money off of it. But AI is just fine, because he can make tons of money off of it. I understand now. Makes perfect sense.

[–] Fades 21 points 3 days ago
[–] Static_Rocket 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Fuck it. Gun it at the brick wall. Jerry's rigging up an emergency break as we speak. Don't mind that the last piece to said break may be missing.

- Man who will probably die before we hit the wall

[–] RizzRustbolt 6 points 2 days ago

While shooing folks away from a curtained-off area.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago

If this isn't the most cynical message forum then I don't know what is.

[–] TheGrandNagus 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Rich billionaire twat who owns a shitload of Microsoft shares says AI is good, don't let the bubble burst. More at ten.

[–] 555_1 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Don’t forget about him spending time on Epstein’s island with a bunch of underage girls.

[–] TheGrandNagus 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Or how the Gates foundation fought for the Oxford COVID vaccine NOT to be open sourced, and instead sold for profit, so that it wouldn't undermine his pharma stocks.

Oxford university had previously secured funding from the UK gov to develop the vaccine under the expectation they open source it so that poorer countries would have greater vaccine access and the rollout could be faster.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

They gonna be hawking these cliff notes machines even as the last breathable air disappears.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Ah yes, classic tech solutionism.

"No need to be frugal, the tech will evolve and fix the causes of climate change!"

We need a solution right now, not in a decade, dumb ass. So frugality is the answer.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Suddenly I'm worried about AI's energy draw. "6 percent of global electricity" is not a small amount of electricity.

[–] maxinstuff 8 points 3 days ago

Iceland figured this out some years ago, and now they make heaps exporting computing power to international AI compute buyers.

They do it with a naturally cold climate, and loads of geo-thermal power.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

Are we absolutely sure it's real Bill Gates and not Robot Bill Gates? I mean he's had bad takes before but maybe it's best to be sure?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I wish to live in a world where the media doesn't consist of articles about how some rich or famous person says or thinks something.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›