this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
292 points (95.9% liked)

World News

39392 readers
3242 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NotAnotherLemmyUser 148 points 6 months ago (3 children)

The painting is protected by glass, so no damage was done to the painting.

I read through way too many articles that failed to mention this important detail.

http://bbc.com/news/articles/cydd9ye77rmo

[–] [email protected] 52 points 6 months ago (4 children)

It wouldn’t be a big loss. That painting is ugly as hell.

[–] [email protected] 76 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I think it's a terrific representation of the horrifically bloody history of the British Monarchy

[–] Leg 15 points 6 months ago

Yeah, I don't think it was meant to be pretty lol

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Yeah, I know the artist said some other bullshit to justify this choice, but to me it just looks like the blood their wealth was built on.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Pilferjinx 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I like it because it's hella odd as shit. King, embrace the fuck-my-shit-up results of this glorious piece.

[–] Aviandelight 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I can't stop thinking about how someone got paid to make this painting.

[–] RizzRustbolt 13 points 6 months ago (2 children)

He's pretty famous for making portraits. Here's his portrait of Idris Elba.

[–] FuglyDuck 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

See, that isn’t ugly.

Which makes me think it was on purpose. Which makes me hate it a little less.

[–] RizzRustbolt 9 points 6 months ago

He has a lot of upper class clients who he paints just as ... starkly as the king's portrait.

It is very much on purpose.

[–] Aviandelight -3 points 6 months ago

Now that is a gorgeous balance of color and brush strokes. So why did the artist choose that awful color theme for Charles?

[–] chuckleslord 5 points 6 months ago

Right? Spit right in the royal families face and they pay you for the privilege. Priceless and hilarious

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago
[–] Moneo 9 points 6 months ago

Same shit that happens with every climate protest. "Climate protestors deface painting" etc.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

It's much less engaging this way.

[–] FlyingSquid 35 points 6 months ago

I wouldn't anger Count Vigo of Carpathia like that. Remember what happened the last time?

[–] Donkter 26 points 6 months ago

He got turned into Wallace. The titular character.

[–] khannie 23 points 6 months ago

You really have to hand it to the British. They're great at stuff like this.

Nice bit of Wensleydale with a protest, eh?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago

Improved it tbh.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

turned into wallace and gromit

so where's the change?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

He's smarter and less evil now.

[–] aeronmelon 16 points 6 months ago

"Fancy some cheese?"

[–] Mango 15 points 6 months ago

Oh no! Some rich person's pretty garbage was ridiculed!?

Heck off. I have real problems.

[–] thorbot 5 points 6 months ago

Now THIS is pod racing!!!!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

"Give them a hefty jail sentence!!" - Conservative Party

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

It still looks like him, except happier.

[–] afraid_of_zombies 1 points 6 months ago

I remember when you could go to an art museum and see pictures and sculptures of stuff. That was kinda nice.