this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
166 points (95.6% liked)

News

22841 readers
4381 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

U.S. Senator Marco Rubio, an ally of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, will not accept the results of the Nov. 5 election if they are "unfair," he said on Sunday.

"Will you accept the election results of 2024, no matter what happens, senator?" NBC News' "Meet the Press" host Kristen Welker asked Rubio, a Florida Republican, in an interview.

"No matter what happens? No," Rubio answered. "If it's an unfair election, I think it's going to be contested by either side."

Trump and his allies are laying the groundwork to contest a potential loss in November, stoking doubts about the election's legitimacy even as polls show the former president leading in battleground states, Reuters reported on Thursday.

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Etterra 74 points 3 months ago (1 children)

~~unfair~~ different than what I want.

FTFY

These assholes are acting like toddlers and should be treated as such.

[–] grue 40 points 3 months ago (1 children)

These assholes are acting like ~~toddlers~~ treasonous criminals and should be treated as such.

FTFY

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

Agreed, infantilizing fascists is dangerous. Are most of their supporters just dumb/misinformed? Probably. But we mustn't pretend that the movement isn't orchestrated by very smart people manipulating the masses in order to consolidate power in the hands of them and their rich friends.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Why is there never a simple follow-up question: "Mr. Rubio, how will you personally determine the fairness of the election?"

[–] Jimmyeatsausage 8 points 3 months ago

"I can't say for sure, but I'll know it when I see it"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Or "What if you win?"

[–] rayyy 38 points 3 months ago

It is really simple, US Senator Rubio says he won't accept election results if ~~unfair~~ their orange mobster guy doesn't win.

[–] Apollonius_Cone 37 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Trump and his allies are laying the groundwork to contest a potential loss

While that's probably true, Rubio kinda gave a reasonable answer to an unreasonable question. Of course there are possible circumstances that any reasonable person would not honour the results of an election.

Of all the ridiculous shit these guys say, maybe don't pick the one time they're actually in the right. Like they tell on themselves all the time, you generally don't have to twist their words.

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana 24 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Fact is that democracy depends on people believing in fairness in order for the electoral process to be fair. When it starts to be questioned is when the system starts tearing at the seams.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

I agree, it's best to not pull at the fraying threads of democracy, but it's not like there's never been a controversial election before. Take the 2000 Gore v. Bush election, for example.

If Reuters wants to expose the laying of groundwork, then they have to do more than baiting a fairly mundane statement out of a single R. They have to collect evidence of republicans doing it themselves. This is just lazy reporting that plays to peoples fears.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The article clearly states that you are wrong.

Trump and his allies are laying the groundwork to contest a potential loss in November, stoking doubts about the election's legitimacy even as polls show the former president leading in battleground states, Reuters reported on Thursday.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Where does it provide evidence to support that statement?

[–] OccamsRazer 2 points 3 months ago

The entire system is being challenged from top to bottom, with supreme Court justices and Judges all over being called into question.

[–] Hildegarde -2 points 3 months ago

Democracy relies on elections actually being fair. Questioning the process is the only way to make things fair, and the process being robust in the face of questions demonstrates it.

This idea that elections are unquestionabe is genuinely dangerous.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Trump and his allies are laying the groundwork to contest a potential loss

He did that in the run up to the 2016 (and 2020) election as well.

Trump has always claimed that if he doesn't win it must be because someone (other than him) was cheating.

[–] Coreidan 7 points 3 months ago

Cry more bitch