this post was submitted on 03 May 2024
275 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19143 readers
3332 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rapidcreek 58 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago (2 children)

ROFL I wasn't even surprised, honestly was keeping up with the news to see when the big story about the fraud that this firm engaged in. Almost everything that man has something to do with this sketchy as fuck!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't want to fully paint every company in a corrupt light (some might be on the up and up, but an employee or two may be scummy AF). It would be inept of said company to not notice their employees colluding with Trump, but not necessarily intentionally corrupt. I'm a weird ass cynic with idealistic tendencies, make of that what you will.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Comrade. I'm also in that cynic boat. Glad we're here chilling.

[–] Thrashy 3 points 6 months ago

This is the guy who couldn't even be bothered to spell his own name correctly, after all. I don't get the sense that he's going over anything with a fine-toothed comb on the best of days.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Public companies that have hired BF Borgers will need to find new accounting firms, the SEC alerted companies in a separate statement on Friday.

Trump Media announced plans to do just that.

“Trump Media looks forward to working with new auditing partners in accordance with today’s SEC order,” Trump Media spokesperson Shannon Devine told CNN in a statement.

And audit of their firm from a legitimate company is going to be interesting. Surely they didn't pick hire these sham auditors to help them hide stuff...

[–] just_another_person 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm thinking most of the fraud happening is on the open market with DJT Media now.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I gotta imagine that thing will dump before Trump's shares get out of lock up. If not, we'll see Trump himself will do the dumping I think as soon as he can sell.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I have faith that the Russians or Saudis or some rich rwnj will buy shares in order to bribe trump.

[–] Boddhisatva 1 points 6 months ago

I'm pretty sure that they have already been buying shares to prop it up.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 6 months ago (2 children)

"Massive fraud". "Only the best fraud".

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

Very bigly fraud.

[–] Theprogressivist 4 points 6 months ago

"You've never seen fraud like this in this country."

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Where is @[email protected]? I guess I'll have to be the change I want to see.

[–] FlyingSquid 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Damn it, you take one nap...

[–] Rapidcreek 4 points 6 months ago

Ah. King of chat boards. How ya doin?

[–] Rapidcreek 3 points 6 months ago

The big man?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (3 children)

The company has hired the best available lawyer they could find.

[–] meleethecat 4 points 6 months ago
[–] Badeendje 1 points 6 months ago

For the price they where willing to pay

[–] RattlerSix 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Wow.l! Something associated with Trump isn't on the up and up?

[–] baru 3 points 6 months ago

If a company willingly involves itself with Trump then that action might be a great reason to investigate them for crimes.

[–] Jas91a 8 points 6 months ago

It's always the ones you'd most expect

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

Par for the course

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

At this point, did they allow Trump to launch the ipo to catch him in future crimes? No idea why they would buy off considering how many people are getting charged.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

What else would you expect from Trump?