submitted 1 month ago by homesweethomeMrL to c/politics

SAN FRANCISCO, April 17 (Reuters) - Microsoft said on Wednesday that Russian online campaigns to influence the upcoming U.S. presidential election kicked into gear over the past 45 days, but at a slower pace than in past elections.

Russia-linked accounts are disseminating divisive content aimed at U.S. audiences, including criticising American support of Ukraine in its war with Russia, researchers at the tech giant said in a report.

While the Russian activity Microsoft observed is not as intense as around the previous elections, it could increase in the coming months, the researchers said.

"Messaging regarding Ukraine - via traditional media and social media - picked up steam over the last two months with a mix of covert and overt campaigns from at least 70 Russia-affiliated activity sets we track," Microsoft said.

The most prolific of such Russian campaigns is linked to Russia's Presidential Administration, they added. Another one is aimed at posting disinformation online in various languages, with posts typically starting with an apparent whistleblower or citizen journalist posting content on a video channel. That content is then covered by a network of websites that include DC Weekly, Miami Chronical and The Intel Drop.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Theprogressivist 25 points 1 month ago

I thought it was already happening for the last 8 years?

[-] homesweethomeMrL 4 points 1 month ago
[-] mipadaitu 14 points 1 month ago

Just look at the down voted comments in any politics thread on Lemmy. Probably half of them are obvious trolls, paid or unpaid.

[-] homesweethomeMrL 9 points 1 month ago

Sometimes they call themselves “republicans”

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

"It's the same picture."

[-] magiccupcake 3 points 1 month ago

Is lemmy really big enough for trolls?

It just seems so, pointless? Not very effective at reaching a lot of people.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

One of the key entry points for disinformation campaigns are small communities with individuals sympathetic to the propaganda/misinformation. 10 or 15 sock puppet accounts pushing the same narrative will have an outsized impact on the discourse of a community like ours.

The sympathetic individuals then multiply the propaganda and spread it to more mainstream platforms.

It should also be noted that in first past the post voting voter suppression of one candidate is as effective or even more effective than convincing someone to vote for the other.

[-] Ensign_Crab 1 points 1 month ago

It's easier to dismiss deviations from centrist orthodoxy as the output of russian operatives.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

Begun? They never stopped.

[-] SkybreakerEngineer 9 points 1 month ago

The ones that started around 2016 and never stopped?

[-] Skyrmir 7 points 1 month ago

Overall the efforts never stopped, specific ops tend to get aged out on a regular basis. There's always something, it's just usually someone else after a few months.

[-] eran_morad 5 points 1 month ago

… in 2012

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago
[-] ghostdoggtv 1 points 1 month ago

It's curious that this wasn't posted until after they started conducting massive bot attacks on Ukrainian journalists on platforms like YouTube etc. Give Ukraine their nukes back and this all ends tomorrow.

this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
118 points (99.2% liked)


17799 readers
3950 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!


  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:


World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 11 months ago