this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2024
278 points (98.9% liked)

politics

20497 readers
2935 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Down at the bottom of the article, there's a pretty detailed explanation:

Follow the paper trail and you’ll find that it’s likely because AFPM (and its member organizations) are reliable donors for AGs and for their governing organization, the Republican Attorneys General Association (RAGA).

As tracked by the Center for Media and Democracy, AFPM donated $246,720 from 2014-2016, $60,625 in 2017, $220,725 from 2019-2020, $40,000 in 2021 and another $75,150 in 2023. In sum, over the last ten years, AFPM organizationally has funneled at least $643,220 to RAGA overall. Member groups have also funneled money to RAGA, including Valero ($225,000 in 2023,) Exxon ($100,000 in 2023,) Chevron ($25,000 in 2023), and more.

Such a favorable financial dynamic means that individual AGs benefit hugely from AFPM dollars, even when the people of their states don’t, and — as the numbers make clear — the people of their states don’t.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NegativeInf 64 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Boy, American politicians sure are cheap.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Too expensive for ordinary people to buy, but pocket change for billionaires and major corporations.

It's a problem.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres 19 points 10 months ago

That’s always one of the most shocking part of bribery scandals to me. Politicians get caught taking bribes to do something awful and it’s like $6,500. Can’t even get a used Camry for that these days.

[–] oDDmON 36 points 10 months ago

Follow the $$$.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Rule 6 says no advocating violence, but honestly how do you respond to people who are literally killing the planet and everyone on it? This is about survival.

[–] Burn_The_Right 7 points 10 months ago

The actions needed to solve this problem are also against the law.

Sometimes, rules must be broken for the greater good.

[–] Cryophilia 2 points 10 months ago

Make bribery illegal

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

They can do violence to you but don't you even dare think about violence to them. The rule is bad.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

Regulatory capture can be yours for some low low payments of 599.99 for just a few months.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Lol what a title....

"Money money money money, bribes, money, bribes. Why this happen!?"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

This is not surprising at all whatsoever. These companies want to use the Republican controlled courts to de-fang the Clean Air Act and gut the EPA so their rich donors can continue to dump chemicals and pollute without millions of dollars in fines.

This has been the Republican and Corporate Democrats long term strategy for decades. The Republicans are just not hiding it anymore.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Poisoning the Air is PRO LIFE! Isn't that right OHIO?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Of course they are. SCOTUS ruled Congress and the political parties were for up for sale fourteen years ago with Citizens United and SpeechNow decisions.

Unless that condition changes neither will this trajectory.

[–] Sam_Bass 2 points 10 months ago
[–] Etterra 2 points 10 months ago

~~Kickbacks~~ ~~bribes~~ campaign donations.

[–] Furedadmins 1 points 10 months ago

It's disgusting how cheap these whores are.