this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
153 points (93.2% liked)

science

14910 readers
198 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If this isn't just corporate hype, this could be great for making smaller batteries, hopefully less resource intensive.

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 40 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I'm carefully optimistic. A new "battery tech breakthrough" is reported on every few months without anything coming out of it, but solid state batteries has been talked about for a while and might be the one to actually take over for LiPo (in some circumstances, at least). The tech looks promising, and I'm looking forward to seeing how this technology matures.

[–] cogman 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is more than a "breakthrough" IMO. Manufacturers have been eyeing and researching solid states for a long time now. It's not just a lab toy.

[–] Kushan 5 points 8 months ago

And according to the article, some of these are going on sale later this year.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Oh another huge groundbreaking battery technology that will very soon change the world!!!!!

Let me just log that with the 8436 times I've read that in the last 2 decades.

[–] xkforce 22 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Over the last two decades battery technology has increased DRASTICALLY. So the cynicism isnt entirely deserved.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It has; but afaik it has been more through incremental improvements rather than huge technological leaps.

[–] xkforce 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not exactly. Those technological leaps are spread throughout. It just looks like its entirely incremental even though its not really. It takes time to develop things and along the way the existing tech is refined.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Just because the increments aren't in a straight line doesn't mean they're not still incremental.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I know battery tech is progressing and lithium ion is way advanced, but every month I see a bait article claiming they are revolutionizing the tech and this new technology will DOUBLE or TRIPLE the liion battery... Especially the solid state battery articles. It's always bait

[–] xkforce 1 points 8 months ago

It takes time to develop things. And solid state batteries like this really are promising.

[–] bbuez 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If I had a nickel for every groundbreaking battery technology discovered, I could make my own groundbreaking discovery! Just trust me this time

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

You'd certainly have an adequate supply of nickel for the required metallurgy...

[–] dezmd 2 points 8 months ago

Still waiting on those miracle molten salt batteries that are going to revolutionize long term energy storage.

[–] random_character_a 2 points 8 months ago

Some of those were dangerous as hell and we won't see them in consumer use ever, unless somebody wants a very expensive frag grenade.

[–] CoffeeJunkie 32 points 8 months ago

Don't trust reports, or anything really, coming out of China at face value. Product in hand, undoctored video proof, lab tests done by a trusted group.

[–] dual_sport_dork 20 points 8 months ago

A solid-state battery developer in China has unveiled a new cell that could help change the game for electric mobility.

Oh yeah? Again?

Tailan did not mention any specific plans for passenger vehicle integration yet, but did state its latest generation of all-solid-state battery cells are vehicle grade. If the company is able to scale this technology large enough for consumer vehicles while keeping prices down...

Ah, so more vaporware. Same as usual. Come find me when these technologies actually exist.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

We'll do fine with 250-300 mile range if charging infrastructure is improved. Use further battery breakthroughs for reducing weight, not increasing range.

Though the possibility of fully electric airplanes is exciting.

[–] MeanEYE 5 points 8 months ago

Increased capacity is reduced weight since now you need less battery for came range. Although I doubt these claims. Improvements in technology are usually marginal, not 5x or more.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

If the company is able to scale this technology large enough for consumer vehicles while keeping prices down ...

[–] Jimmycakes 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

They probably won't care about keeping costs down if they are developing 1300 miles range batteries that's gonna be for industrial and military applications. Maybe some very high end consumer use.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Alternatively, they could make smaller versions for consumer vehicles that take up less space/weight.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, this kind of headline is stupid. Any battery can offer any given range if it's large enough. This kind of thing should be written as distance/mass or, for consumer products, cost/distance.

[–] nBodyProblem 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Even that is meaningless because the vehicle you put a battery in is as important or moreso than the battery.

Aptera has a claimed 1,000+ mile range with a 100 kWh lithium battery. Meanwhile, the Rivian R1S has a claimed 270 mile range when equipped with a 106 kWh battery.

The main difference is that the Aptera is a light and aerodynamic car built for maximum efficiency instead of a 6,000 lb pickup truck. Any battery can boast amazing numbers if you are flexible enough with the use case.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

That's true. I guess it should just be kWh/mass. Either that or we should have a standard vehicle all batteries are tested on for headlines if they want to talk about distance, which is obviously more understandable to the average reader.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

It will start like that, but this tech will become more and more affordable as time goes on.

[–] set_secret 12 points 8 months ago

just 3 to 5 years guys....

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If the company is able to scale this technology large enough for consumer vehicles[…]

Big ask

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Why? Just fill the trunk with 18650 cells and off you go.

[–] tigerjerusalem 2 points 7 months ago

This will be a great pair to my quantum graphene notebook!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Made in PRC, I'll pass.