Kushan

The point is that Firefox market share isn't indicative of anything useful.

A better comparison would be something like revenue - if Mozilla makes more money, the CEO can earn more.

Mozilla does a lot more than just Firefox and I'm fact increasing revenue from other sources should have been a priority anyway

I gave up on spirited away half way through it.

Ghibli it's very hit and miss for me, it's either really amazing or really tedious and boring.

"It was so busy. And everyone's naked and p***ed.

"And I was there in my tweed coat, looking like a complete lunatic. And one guy, as we were filming, made eye contact with me, and I thought, don't look at him, don't look at him. Don't look him in the eyes."

The comic continued: "And then I caught his eye, and he came over to me, this drunken guy.

"I didn't see where he went, but apparently he was going to go for me, wasn't he? And the security guys launched at him."

That's how the actress herself describes the incident, make of that what you will.

The hicks in letterkenny are not hateful at all, they're very open minded and accepting.

They do hate on "degens", who are more like the hicks you're familiar with.

This article is nearly a year old, FYI

Thanks for the tip on Read you, I've tried a few RSS readers and not been entirely happy but this one seems nice!

You don't hate Charity, you hate that charity is necessary.

We should not have the problems that charities exist to try and solve. I think most would agree with that.

The problem is that people couldn't agree on which areas we should tackle first. Is it sick kids? Cancer patients? Mental health?

We can't do all of the things, that's the real issue, so we end up picking and choosing the things we feel are most important. And that's what charities really do, they give you a chance to pick the thing that matters most to you.

That's not quite accurate.

The onion's bid was technically lower overall, but they made an agreement with some of the victims of Jones' harassment that would make them better off overall.

Essentially one group is legally owed 97% of the proceeds of the sale while everyone else gets what's left. The agreement was that instead of a 97:3 split, the smaller group gets a bigger payout and the larger group gets a cut of future ad revenue.

Everybody wins in this arrangement, except Alex Jones. So everyone wins.

We're not getting out of this unscathed.

The infighting and arguing is, at best, the grifters trying to secure the best grift for themselves at the expense of everyone else.

KFC's reasoning is that the chicken supply industry hasn't transitioned to more humanitarian chickens yet, but frustratingly the article doesn't validate this claim.

It KFC is correct and they're reliant on an industry that hasn't got the supply it needs, then it's impossible for them to meet the targets they set and it makes sense they would have to walk back the pledge.

However if the industry does have that supply, then KFC is full of shit.

So which is it?

So is brown. Brown is dark orange.

Don't worry about not having any insights, I still valve-ued the pun.