You would think a billionaire could afford a makeup artist that could blend that terrible foundation/spray tanner a little better. Not that he needs it, but the thumbnail makes him look like a sad clown. I hope he's as sad as he looks.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
at this point, it's 100% intentional. it's part of his brand. Like the shitty poorly fit ties (that are kept in place by fucking scotch tape.)
No, he really thinks he looks great. This man has never shown anything like self awareness.
Yes. That’s why he does it.
It’s still part of his branding.
Holy fuck this is genius and hilarious. His base subconsciously sees themselves in him all the better when he wears his baggy outdated men's wearhouse sack over his depends.
It looks like he's wearing someone else's face.
I'm sure all the good ones quit and he uses spray tan on the recommendation of someone who's business card says "tarot reading/tanning specialist/crystal healer/hair stylist".
.../Four Seasons Landscaping/Press Venue Hire
He probably has the same hairstylist as Ghoulianni as well.
I've got a couple of airbrushes, I'd be happy to paint a couple of racing stripes or something on him free of charge. (Not like he'd pay anyway.)
I'd paint a 'pinwheel.'
see how long it takes for people to notice.
I read somewhere that he does his own makeup every morning. Too lazy to find sources though so don't listen to me.
What's the saying... You can't use logic to reason people out of beliefs that they didn't use logic to get themselves into?
How could there could possibly be moderates at this point. People who are like... Hmm, I better wait until the next debate or I'm still thinking about it. We already know what we're going to get... With both guys!
If you haven't been paying attention for this long then this is one time when you should probably not show up to vote.
There's always swing voters mate.
"Moderates" in this election are just people who don't care about the issues. Like they think all politicians are crooks and don't pay attention to the news. Maybe they lean one way but don't like what their candidate is doing right now.
Forget about moderates. You have to turn out your base. Why do you think Biden is doing this "mea culpa" thing building a pier in Gaza? It looks good to his base, probably not too risky to American soldiers. Costs little because all that equipment and those soldiers are just training anyway. It's actually very smart.
Honestly delivering food is great training for the military: it's hard, achievable, and the end result is good vibes. Plus it makes both Israel and Hamas look like dicks.
That's not nearly enough money.
They are going up against billionaires paying for free busing and events to fringe supporters. Hell, they have spent way over that busing the poorest migrants all the way from Texas to New York. There's a lot of money being spent to turn the US into a completely corrupt oligarchy, and it's way more than $50 million and even the 500-400 million that Trump owes, all coming from the business empires making their record profits from screwing people.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
An anti-Trump Republican group is planning to spend $50 million in a campaign to stop the former president from winning a second term in the White House.
The plan is to target “moderate Republican” and Republican-leaning voters in swing states with videos.
The ads featuring the former Trump voter testimonials will be deployed on TV, streaming platforms, billboards, radio and digital media.
“Former Republicans and Republican-leaning voters hold the key to 2024, and reaching them with credible, relatable messengers is essential to re-creating the anti-Trump coalition that made the difference in 2020,” Longwell, the president of the group’s Republican Accountability PAC, said in a Tuesday statement.
“It establishes a permission structure that says that — whatever their complaints about Joe Biden — Donald Trump is too dangerous and too unhinged to ever be president again.
“The peaceful transfer of power is one of the defining pieces of our democracy, and I could not believe that someone I had formerly supported would get behind an effort that would throw that under the bus … There is no choice.”
The original article contains 372 words, the summary contains 177 words. Saved 52%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
This year is going to be entertaining. Republicans vs republicans.
Last time that happened, trump won
Fair enough really.
gee. thanks.
$50 million when they could do it for $5