this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
716 points (97.1% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5205 readers
1310 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 44 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

A great start! We're going to need to see way more of this to reverse the massive increase of natural gas production since Feb 2021 (2.6 trillion cubic ft / month then vs 3.5 trillion now, a 34% increase in less than 3 years and an all-time high for the US)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Yes, but a lot of it goes to the EU and they lost Russias supply. Similar story with oil. There are massive OPEC+ cuts and the US fills the void.

[–] anarchy79 -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Get over yourself, we'll have global war followed by a thousand years of anarchy before this fucking travesty is over.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Anarchy would be an improvement over this shitscape.

[–] anarchy79 42 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No wonder they all fucking hate him.

But I guess "both sides" are the same and represent the "status quo", right?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] BlackPenguins 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Joe Bi the Science Guy

[–] idunnololz 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

How do you like me? How do you like me? ~~

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Mo'! Mo'! Mo'!

[–] anarchy79 1 points 9 months ago

I think I gonna bomb a town, get down!

[–] Coreidan 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Hopefully the trend continues after re-election and this isn’t just a stunt to secure votes.

[–] nothingcorporate 1 points 8 months ago

His administration has overseen the highest domestic oil production of all time, and they've bragged about that... So it is a bit sus

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

at least until after the election

[–] [email protected] 35 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes, yes, we know... All politicians are corrupt and bad, both sides are the same, don't vote, everything sucks, nothing matters, etc.

Or you could have just the tiniest bit of hope and diligence to improve the world...

[–] anarchy79 25 points 9 months ago

"It's not perfect, therefore it's useless, and because it is, I'm going to vote for the worse alternative. Don't make me explain my reasoning further."

[–] givesomefucks 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

After the election it'll still be record level drilling, just like there is now.

The record will just be higher

[–] Psychodelic 5 points 9 months ago

You say that like most Americans wouldn't support doing literally anything that would lower gas prices. The problem is trying to make everyone happy.

I mean, most people I know bring up gas prices before they bring up climate change, if at all. I try to remind these people that while the president/Congress can take actions to increase drilling there are many of us in the US that would prefer they didn't.

I usually then make it clear how obviously easy it is for me to say that as someone that works from home and isn't as impacted by gas prices; context is always important.

[–] nikaaa 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

related: https://lemmy.world/post/15990629

TL;DR: New fossil fuel permits are no longer needed, and they should no longer be warranted.

Edit: Apparently this article is about export permits, while my link is about production permits.

[–] doingless -3 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Why do I feel like every time politicians do the right thing, it's the home budgets of regular people who pay for it?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Regular people are paying for it when a hurricane destroys their city. Think of switching to clean energy as an investment, if having a planet to live on doesn't do it for you. edit: typo

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

This is about blocking export terminals. Building them raises domestic prices. So it has a financial benefit for Americans who use gas for heat and has a climate benefit.