this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
472 points (98.2% liked)

News

23422 readers
5045 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 145 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Got some pot on you? Straight to jail. Try to overthrow the government? See you in 3+ years where you MIGHT get a slap on the wrist but also might get to be president again.

[–] morphballganon 29 points 9 months ago

Only if you try to overthrow the government for the Federalists. If you try to overthrow it in the name of progress, you'll be a spending the rest of your life in a very uncomfortable prison.

[–] agent_flounder 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

While you're almost certainly right... this is your response to what should be a tiny bit of good news? Maybe it's time for a break from the news?

I mean, what would you have done if they had ruled in favor of immunity instead of denying it??

As for me, I'll take the w here.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

I kinda get your point, but also If you watch enough news you realize there is no W here. It's all meaningless because Trump owns SCOTUS and they have the final say.

EDIT: No, SCOTUS isn't beholden to Trump but electing him is in their interests.

EDIT2: Well I certainly hope yall are right and they won't let him on the ballot but I'm not holding my breath.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

SCOTUS isn’t beholden to anyone. Not even Trump. Once they were confirmed they don’t need a thing from him and have that office until they die. Sure they have a right leaning majority, but they still seem pretty cognizant that there rulings can be used by democrats too, so handing wins to Trump isn’t exactly straight forward. If they claim Trump has immunity while in office and after leaving, that applies to the current administration too. It would be a huge gamble to rule in favor of Trump on this appeal and I don’t think they want to open that can of worms while someone else can take advantage of it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Not to mention, even if Trump gets out of this scot free, the results of the n xt election are far from certain. Biden could be welding thos immunity powers for the next four years too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

They've ruled against him a lot. They could have thrown a huge wrench into the election by allowing Texas to sue PA, buy they didn't it. If he owned it, it would go the other way.

[–] Telodzrum 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

lol be more wrong, my man

SCOTUS is laden with Federalist Society conservative wackjobs, but they (aside from Thomas and Alito a bit) have zero love for Trump. They're more than happy to side with him when it serves long-term conservative principles and aims, but that have demonstrated zero hesitation when his policies and pleadings don't align with their own.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But him winning the presidency does align with their goals. So yeah, saying he owns them is wrong, but it's how they're gonna vote.

[–] Telodzrum -2 points 9 months ago

Not really.

[–] njm1314 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Except the Trump presidency does coincide with their aims. Trump would Usher in the greatest destruction of the federal government in US history. He's the federalist society's dream. He has no morals or Scruples he does whatever his advisors tell him and his advisors are from the Federalist Society.

[–] Telodzrum -2 points 9 months ago

They’re killing Chevron without him. Maybe read something instead of harvesting takes from YouTube and Twitter, my dude.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Damn paywalls...

Short article though:

Donald Trump can be prosecuted for trying to overturn the 2020 US election, a federal appeals court ruled, rejecting his claim of immunity and moving him closer to trial before November’s presidential vote as he seeks to return to the White House. The decision by a three-judge panel with the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit marks a watershed moment in the historic prosecution of Trump by Special Counsel Jack Smith on criminal charges of conspiring to reverse his loss in the last election and remain in power. Trump, the frontrunner for the Republican nomination, may be the first major party candidate to stand trial for criminal actions while campaigning for the presidency.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 9 months ago

It’s a foregone conclusion that Trump is going to win the Republican nomination. The nightmare scenario for the republicans has to be Trump going in as the nominee and then being found guilty of a felony charge. It won’t bleed off the Trumpists, but it certainly might make the never-Bidens stay home rather than voting for the guy.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Trump has until Feb. 12 to appeal ruling to Supreme Court

Where his hand picked pack of fascist court majority will reverse the appeals court decision.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Will they though? It's a dangerous precedent to set and would let Biden make use of the same immunity (not that he's likely to use the opportunity..)

[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago

Chutkan had to reschedule the trial, so they got the delay they were looking for and can now make the obvious judgement that could have been made weeks ago.

Jack Smith is so fucked, I feel bad for the poor guy. He's like Grimes trying to protect us from Homer.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Likely prosecution roadmap. Trump is going to die in Federal custody.

[–] ZhaoYadang 3 points 9 months ago

Bet he never spends a day in custody. He’ll either 1) litigate it all till he dies, 2) become dictator, or 3) flee to Russia.

[–] Suavevillain 7 points 9 months ago

He really shouldn't be able to run for President after his actions. Good on the courts here.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

But wait, there's more!