this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
329 points (93.9% liked)

News

23297 readers
3710 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZooGuru 84 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Hooray for people losing their jobs? Celebrating something like this is missing the point.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Creating division is why forbes wrote an article.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Obviously the article is a bit inflammatory, but the overall message really isn't wrong.

Unionize or die, basically. Obviously not literally, but one of the clearest lessons of the last year has been unions help preserve job security. It's not a lesson that should have been needed, and frankly it'll fall on far too many deaf ears, but hopefully more people realize it.

[–] ZooGuru 7 points 9 months ago

100% agree that unions are vital. That being said, I’m a current non-union employee that was promoted from union employees who I now supervise. They are in contract negotiations and I hope they get the best deal possible. I see it as mutually beneficial. Unions are absolutely necessary for workers rights. The “maybe they used to be” argument is total BS. Businesses exists to make money and if asking someone to do something unsafe makes a business more money, they will find people to do it every time. Bit of a digression on my part all to say I think I agree with you.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I was like WTF? It reads to me like "non-union workers lose their jobs while union ones don't", but then they had to somehow manufacture drama for the sake of more drama so they could add drama to their drama, when no drama needed to exist in the first place?

Fuck the for-profit media:-(.

[–] ZooGuru 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah for sure. To me it sounds like “hey, non-union employees. You better be pushing union employees to accept less or we will just cut your jobs”. The headline alone feels very much like a threat.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Again you have to view the source. It's Forbes.

The entire point of Forbes and most media these days - is to sow discontent in the class war. It is one of the many weapons of the billionaire class.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

This is Fortune though - please forgive my ignorance, but is that like a known subsidiary of Forbes or something? I searched for the word "Forbes" on the page and found nothing.

Anyway, perhaps we need a community that displays news articles while excluding such known shills. While we are at it, ditch click-bait articles too:-).

The problem there is that there likely would be next to nothing left!

[–] [email protected] -3 points 9 months ago

I still would wager this direction is good.

Anecdotally there's seemingly been a plague of unnecessary or incompetent middle management (i.e. administrative overhead) in lots of places for lots of years.

Reducing the number of layers a bit is probably a good thing even if some people lose their jobs in the process.

[–] Narlythotep 58 points 9 months ago

Notice the words "job cuts for executives" is absolutely no where...the director of tire wear attrition services is still making 300k a year.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 9 months ago (2 children)

UPS driver here.

You could see the writing on the wall years ago. A vast majority of driver supervisors now have little to zero area knowledge (how the routes are looped, where to go for pickups ect) they do everything through the board. My old supervisor, 10 years ago, even said they were going to be the first cuts. "You see that board?" he said," It literally will do my job later on in your career. " That's going to be your supervisor." Oh man, how right he was. Too bad they blew over 10 billion on the stupid algorithm ORION. That money should have been spent on the fleet of trucks improving gas mileage or going electric. Nope. Get a shitty ass algorithm that decides to send you directly into school traffic right when it gets out, sends you across town on a whim, and tells you it's OK to do a 5 pm pickup at 10am lmao.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't know about all instances but implementation of ORION was stupidly successful. I don't know what kind of back alley you work in but it did save the company a ton of money overall.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sure did! Look at all the jobs they just shed lmao.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah except since ORION was implemented in 2016 they have added about 100k jobs.

[–] Donebrach 0 points 9 months ago

Surely that can’t be a result of, say, the massive increase in online retail in general. No, no. It’s the computer program that added the jobs.

[–] raynethackery 2 points 9 months ago

Just got word they are removing the UPS drop box on front of our building.

[–] Shadywack 46 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I mean, the vibe I get from this article is that white collar IT and infrastructure roles need to unionize. Laying off other working class and then celebrating it while the executives are still shit rich is aloof. Work is work, and this sucks.

[–] TexasDrunk 14 points 9 months ago

Yep. Articles like this just pit the working class against each other. Delivery drivers vs IT guys is more exciting for executives than workers vs execs.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I'll say this 500x if I have to. People who manage an employee or are supervisors can't unionize. People who make company decisions can't unionize.

[–] Shadywack 3 points 9 months ago

Traditionally white collar jobs that are lumped in with management can and absolutely do unionize. The CWA is growing by leaps and bounds thanks to exactly what this article talks about. Software developers, engineers, sysadmins, and cybersecurity techs absolutely belong in a union. I agree with you that supervisors and managers cannot unionize, but a very large chunk of marketing and IT workers fall in exactly the category of people being laid off here. Work is work.

[–] MojoMcJojo 1 points 9 months ago

I did not know that. What layer of management can unionize?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

100% this.

Unions are on the rise: good

Thousands of people being laid off because companies throw away human lives every 3 months to pay 5 rich people quarterly rather than running responsible business: bad

We all need to unionize.

[–] lapommedeterre 33 points 9 months ago

For UPS, management also includes web, backend, IT, etc positions. Basically if you weren't a hub worker or delivery driver, you're likely non-union and structured as management.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

Making a pun about people losing their jobs in the title of an article is a bad look

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Paywalled?

Regardless, I reject the premise.

UPS will lay off whomever they can. They don't terminate people according to political ideology.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

It's called ORION, and it sucks lmao.