this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
142 points (84.5% liked)

Technology

55883 readers
6047 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kittenzrulz123 149 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I don't care who makes it I'm not putting absolutely proprietary software in my brain

[–] AbidanYre 78 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What's the worst that could happen?

Oh

[–] kittenzrulz123 49 points 5 months ago (6 children)

I don't understand owning a computer that you don't fully control but using prosthetics that can be remotely disabled? This is why we need true open source GPL brain implants.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

This isn’t a prosthetic that was remotely disabled, this is failing hardware that doesn’t have support from the original company which is in the process of going bankrupt.

I get where you’re coming from, and agree. Prosthesis and health devices should absolutely not be remotely controllable by a company. But you can’t really help a company shutting down.

And I highly doubt there are any open source implants which help sure blindness that are ready for prime time.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

But still, if the technology is open, then someone may design some compatible replacement hardware. Imagine some makers community rig a replacement for the blind without carrying about profitability.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That’s one aspect, absolutely.

The other side of that coin though, is if you really want random people tinkering with things directly attached to your body, without having a proper way to test beforehand?

These types of devices need to go through testing before they reach human trials for a reason. While I’m happy to trust security of data and even control of my while home to FOSS communities, I honestly don’t know that I’d trust anonymous individuals online with no skin in the game with my literal body.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Buddahriffic 27 points 5 months ago

Yeah, like this is technology I've wanted since I was a kid, the stuff I wish people were talking about when they say VR, instead of screens you wear on your head and motion-detection controllers. Video games are a lot better when they are dynamic and current VR tech can't really do that yet.

But that said, I'll die never experiencing that before trusting anything Elon Musk is involved with.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What happens if your brain implant is like a phone, and stops getting updates after 2 or so years? That'd suck really bad.

[–] kittenzrulz123 23 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Then I'm jailbreaking my brain implant and installing Linux on it

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The bootloaders gonna be locked.

[–] kittenzrulz123 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It can only stay locked for so long

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

You gonna open up your brain to flash the ROM?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago

Careful not to brick your brain implant.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] grabyourmotherskeys 7 points 5 months ago

That's all it runs.

[–] Cheems 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] kittenzrulz123 28 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Then it wouldn't be absolutely proprietary

[–] Cheems 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Holy smokes it wouldn't be??

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 83 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Why in the actual hell are we allowing Elon Musk of all people to put chips in people's brains?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 5 months ago

People are fucking morons

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago

There is no we. This country is run by capitalist sociopaths.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] einlander 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pixel_witch 73 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Was there not some issues with the animal trials last year or am I misremembering?

[–] themeatbridge 85 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Nah, your implant should have deleted any record of that happening.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

Oh, and don’t worry about calling your lawyer about medical malpractice or anything; after all, we’ve disabled your speech center.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 66 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Didn't the animal tests lead to pretty bad deaths? And wasn't that less than a year ago? I can't imagine this going well.

Plus there was the blind-tech that was revealed not too long ago where now that they're bankrupt the group is slowly going blind and worse. I feel like none of this is going to end well.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago

Lots of them, yes.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] psmgx 28 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Poor is probably what led to it

[–] KnightontheSun 23 points 5 months ago (1 children)

In Elon’s eyes he’s still testing on animals.

[–] taxon 10 points 5 months ago

...Which he is.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

(insert Cave Johnson quote here)

[–] [email protected] 56 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Can't wait to have a stroke because someone put a cryptomining virus on my brainchip.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hperrin 43 points 5 months ago

God speed, guinea pig.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Install this proprietary app from Google Play or App Store on your Google Android or Apple iPhone certified device to access your stored memories.

[–] DingoBilly 10 points 5 months ago

Oops, looks like we had a security flaw and some malware has removed all your memories!

Sorry about that, we've given you free subscription to our Neuralink AI software for 1 year to make up for it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

They can have my memories for like a $.99 app store credit.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

at least the billionaire sub moron believed in his product enough to go down with it.

does this coward have the guts to use his own crap?

[–] NotMyOldRedditName 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

If he hasn't gotten an implant when it moves beyond solving medical problems to being a consumer device that an everyday person would be able to buy, that'd be really telling.

But until then that's not how it works. They need approval to do trials on very specific things, such as working with quadriplegics.

We're probably decades away from non trials for only medical purposes.

[–] BigTrout75 28 points 5 months ago

Pump the stocks with buzzwords!

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 months ago

Oh, that's why he's been behaving this way.

[–] Snapz 20 points 5 months ago

Well if musk said it...

I don't believe it.

[–] kokesh 10 points 5 months ago

I hope he himself has it in him. Based on his progressing psychosis it is in his head for some time now.

[–] peopleproblems 9 points 5 months ago

Watch. It will end up being Alec Baldwin.

Elon Musk saw the shitter episode of South Park, and was inspired by it. He hatched a plan. He needed a company working on brain computer interface technology, and Twitter to get renamed shitter. Nuerolink was easy to find, but Shitter was troublesome. He bought twitter, then in what only could be called by Elon Musk some sort of brilliance, thought he could tank the sites reputation so hard and give it a stupid brand that people would roll their eyes and switch to calling it "shitter."

Once that had taken place, he would be able to develop the technology, and finally release a platform that gave anyone the ability to publicly broadcast all their thoughts without a filter. And he would be loved for it

load more comments
view more: next ›