this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
142 points (84.5% liked)

Technology

61389 readers
4871 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kittenzrulz123 149 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I don't care who makes it I'm not putting absolutely proprietary software in my brain

[–] AbidanYre 78 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's the worst that could happen?

Oh

[–] kittenzrulz123 49 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't understand owning a computer that you don't fully control but using prosthetics that can be remotely disabled? This is why we need true open source GPL brain implants.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This isn’t a prosthetic that was remotely disabled, this is failing hardware that doesn’t have support from the original company which is in the process of going bankrupt.

I get where you’re coming from, and agree. Prosthesis and health devices should absolutely not be remotely controllable by a company. But you can’t really help a company shutting down.

And I highly doubt there are any open source implants which help sure blindness that are ready for prime time.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But still, if the technology is open, then someone may design some compatible replacement hardware. Imagine some makers community rig a replacement for the blind without carrying about profitability.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s one aspect, absolutely.

The other side of that coin though, is if you really want random people tinkering with things directly attached to your body, without having a proper way to test beforehand?

These types of devices need to go through testing before they reach human trials for a reason. While I’m happy to trust security of data and even control of my while home to FOSS communities, I honestly don’t know that I’d trust anonymous individuals online with no skin in the game with my literal body.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that's a legitimate concern, but letting this technology die along with a dying company is a waste. Imagine it getting brought by some patent trolls who wouldn't do anything with it.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm daily driving Linux. And, frankly, for my eye implant, I'll probably buy from apple.

I mean, no, I will buy something else, jailbreak foss it, will have to patch it while being blind from an update, and proudly tell everyone no friggin government will be able to backdoor my eye. But oh boy I'll wish I bought one from apple, cuz those guys never go blind from updates.

[–] teft 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Or when you do go blind the ceo will just say you are holding your iEye in the wrong spot.

[–] Buddahriffic 27 points 1 year ago

Yeah, like this is technology I've wanted since I was a kid, the stuff I wish people were talking about when they say VR, instead of screens you wear on your head and motion-detection controllers. Video games are a lot better when they are dynamic and current VR tech can't really do that yet.

But that said, I'll die never experiencing that before trusting anything Elon Musk is involved with.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What happens if your brain implant is like a phone, and stops getting updates after 2 or so years? That'd suck really bad.

[–] kittenzrulz123 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Then I'm jailbreaking my brain implant and installing Linux on it

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The bootloaders gonna be locked.

[–] kittenzrulz123 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It can only stay locked for so long

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You gonna open up your brain to flash the ROM?

[–] Draconic_NEO 4 points 1 year ago

Probably get a unit w/o having it implanted, modify it, then get it installed unofficially. (Don't ask who or where, because that won't be shared publicly, as it will almost certainly be illegal).

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Careful not to brick your brain implant.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] grabyourmotherskeys 7 points 1 year ago

That's all it runs.

[–] Cheems 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] kittenzrulz123 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then it wouldn't be absolutely proprietary

[–] Cheems 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] kittenzrulz123 3 points 1 year ago

I know shocking