this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024

108 points (98.2% liked)

News

23318 readers

3742 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

108

Suspect dead in Texas after 8 people are killed at 3 locations in Joliet, Illinois (www.cbsnews.com)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/news

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 33 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] TheFlopster 26 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

Nance's prior arrest records indicated that he was previously arrested for aggravated discharge of a weapon involving a woman.

It needs to be specified if you discharge your weapon and a woman is involved? Because that's...a different charge than if a man is involved? What if it's a woman discharging the weapon? Still phrased like this? What a weird thing to write.

[–] AbidanYre 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It implies a domestic dispute rather than, like a bar fight.

[–] eatthecake 9 points 10 months ago

No. They are saying that he was previoualy arrested for aggravated discharge of a weapon and that the aforementioned incident involved a woman.

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Would you have been happier if it had said, "Nance’s prior arrest records indicated that he was previously arrested for aggravated discharge of a weapon involving a person?" Because that sounds awkward to me.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Aggravated discharge implies involving another person so that wouldn't be said. It feels like something is being hinted at - likely domestic violence - without being explicitly said for some reason. I think that's the weirdness being commented on. If it was domestic violence why not say that? But if not that what is being hinted at?

It's probably overthinking, but this is the internet.

[–] TheFlopster 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why not just end the sentence with the word "weapon"? That's the important part.

[–] FlyingSquid 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Because shooting a gun in your front yard at nobody in particular because you're a crazy fucker is different than firing a gun in a way as to threaten a person or persons.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

That's what the "aggravated" part is for. You don't get "aggravated" tacked on if another person is not involved.

[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 10 months ago

Do you think most people understand that?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think that they're saying that the person is implied, aggravated discharge of a weapon with no person involved is just target practice.

[–] FlyingSquid 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't think it is implied. You can do that in your back yard towards a group of neighbors in the next yard who are pissing you off with a party.

Doing it with a single other person involved is a specific situation and specifying the gender just makes the copy easier to scan.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

You're right about the backyard but that would involve a person or people. If the discharge is aggravated, by definition it implies that people are involved. Adding the gender of the person that is implied is done for an emotional response from certain groups by not providing context that is useful. We fill in the blank with our biases.

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yes. Either a person or multiple people. This shows that it was just one person. And the gender is just for easier-to-read copy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

I'm not sure why you take issue with the facts that the word aggravated in this context means that the people are implied, or that adding words is not easier to read. It's okay that you didn't know what aggravated means, but it still doesn't change the fact that this is redundant information. Redundant information is harder to read, and the specific gender of the victim does not add anything to the context for the headline, a de facto harder to read title. It's possible that this was done on purpose, or that the author was also unaware that aggravated means people are involved and felt they needed to add words.

[–] maness300 0 points 10 months ago

They probably would have specified if it was a man, too.

You're making up things to be upset about.

[–] solrize 8 points 10 months ago

JOLIET, Ill. (CBS) -- Eight people were found shot and killed in three different locations over two days in Joliet, and the suspect in the slayings was also found dead by a suspected suicide 1,200 miles away Monday night, police said.

The apparent self-inflicted gunshot death of 23-year-old Romeo Nance in Texas followed a manhunt by multiple law enforcement agencies.

Yikes.