this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
199 points (97.6% liked)

Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related

2401 readers
846 users here now

Health: physical and mental, individual and public.

Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.

See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.

Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.

Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.

Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.

Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Researchers are trying to figure out what is making more young adults sick, and how to identify those at high risk

Meilin Keen was studying for the bar exam and preparing to move to New York City last June when she started throwing up blood.

Keen, 27 years old, learned days later that she has gastric cancer. She postponed the bar exam. Brain fog from chemotherapy made it hard to do her legal work.

Surgeons removed her stomach in December. Keen is coming to terms with all that means for her diet, her health, even her dating life. “That’s a fun icebreaker: I don’t have a stomach anymore,” she said.

Cancer is hitting more young people in the U.S. and around the globe, baffling doctors. Diagnosis rates in the U.S. rose in 2019 to 107.8 cases per 100,000 people under 50, up 12.8% from 95.6 in 2000, federal data show. A study in BMJ Oncology last year reported a sharp global rise in cancers in people under 50, with the highest rates in North America, Australia and Western Europe. 

Doctors are racing to figure out what is making them sick, and how to identify young people who are at high risk. They suspect that changes in the way we live—less physical activity, more ultra-processed foods, new toxins—have raised the risk for younger generations.

Non-paywall link

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MTK 103 points 11 months ago (7 children)

Really tough one...

Is it the plastics? Maybe pollution in the air, or seas? Maybe it's our ultra-processed foods? Maybe our stressful lives from 45 hours work week, or lack of sleep, or lack of money? Maybe aliens? Who knows!

[–] [email protected] 35 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Nah, it’s just lazy Millennial immune systems.

[–] MTK 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I once caught my immune system checking instagram instead of fighting off badly mutating blood cells. Nobody wants to work these days, damn kids!

[–] idunnololz 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

My immune system quit and is currently living on welfare

[–] Xanis 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I'm gonna saaay...chemical mixtures used by corporations have played a hand in this. puts on tinfoil hat And if history has anything to say about it these same corporations likely knew about the risks.

Honestly though, could be the microplasics. The stress. Our general mostly-jokingly stated desire to just die grandly manifesting a physical form. Obesity. Who knows, hopefully we'll have some answers soon.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

My bet is on a combination of all of the above (except aliens... probably)

[–] MTK 3 points 11 months ago

Fool! Dismissing aliens is what they want you to think!

[–] niktemadur 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Plastic is the new asbestos and lead. Goddamnit.

[–] MTK 4 points 11 months ago

Don't dismiss asbestos and lead yet! plastic is jist the latest model in a still maintained series of killers, fun!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (3 children)

The question that really needs an answer is why has this just started to happen now. Air pollution was far worse decades ago. Ultra-processed garbage has been around for a long time, and was arguably more prevalent thirty or forty years ago. Plastics and micro-plastics have not just suddenly appeared (though perhaps they've reached some critical concentration?). Working hours have been largely static since the 80s or so, and have noticeably declined since the 60s.

From looking at a similar article to this, it seems that colorectal cancers have seen the single biggest increase, so you'd be inclined to think diet, but then I wonder if it's a particular new additive or ingredient or if it's simply general diet quality, sugar, lack of fiber, obesity, that sort of thing.

[–] modeler 8 points 11 months ago

Research presented by Zoe (that's a team that includes 2 well known nutritional scientists) says that the quantity of ulta processed food in US and UK diets has been steadily increasing since the 80s. So we should not exclude that possibility.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] piecat 1 points 11 months ago

ultra processed foods

I'm betting specifically sugars. Cancer cells love sugar, allows them to rapidly grow.

It's why we use glucose in PET scans as a way to detect cancer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yenahmik 59 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Probably not related to the extremely high rates of micro plastics found in bottled water recently...

/S

[–] Gigan 21 points 11 months ago

Obesity continues to rise, and that also increases risk of cancer

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Honestly there are so many things that come to mind that it's hard to pick one.

Looking at something that specifically would mean younger people would see a bigger increase than older, I wonder if stress is a big player? We know chronic stress increases your risk of cancer, and with house prices, climate change, social media, degrees becoming almost mandatory to get a job, along with I'm sure many other factors, surely more young adults are chronically stressed than ever?

[–] RestrictedAccount 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I’m sorry, are only young people exposed to microplastics?

This is something specific to the young.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

Probably the people born infused with microplastics while older people only had lead gasoline fumes.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The article notes Cancer is coming to young people more than it used to. It makes no claims that it isn't also coming for older people.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jpreston2005 52 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Stress, Anxiety, microplastics, and the imminent collapse of our ecosystem and society.

most people aren't living, they're surviving

[–] NegativeInf 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Don't forget all the pfas in our blood!

[–] Everythingispenguins 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't that prevent clots though? Keep your blood from sticking to things.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

It does a hell lot more and it evens worse than you think

[–] HerrBeter 5 points 11 months ago

Diesel exhaust particles

[–] [email protected] 35 points 11 months ago (3 children)

It's almost like plastics and the chemicals that make plastic are incompatible with human health. Too bad literally every single thing we use in our day to day life is at least partly made if not entirely made of polymers. We went balls to the wall making plastics in the 50s that we screwed our entire species up, not to mention the planet.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Stress & pollution with a sprinkle of COVID.

[–] snausagesinablanket 12 points 11 months ago

And a smattering of microplastics.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The main figures mentioned are from 2000-2019. So definitely no COVID involved.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not surprising when you learn that perfluorinated compounds (e.g. Teflon) are in the drinking water and everyone's bodies. Teflon, GenX, and other PFCs cause cancer as well as other serious ailments. There are probably other chemicals in the air too that are doing similar work.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (5 children)

But why now then? Teflon has been widespread since the 50s. A lot of these compounds have been around for a long time, so why is this just happening now?

Politics aside, there's a very big scientific question here too that needs to be answered.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The cancer rates have been steadily rising since the 50s.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] calypsopub 5 points 11 months ago

Probably exposure in the womb

[–] AA5B 4 points 11 months ago

Continued growth in usage, continued growth in improper waste disposal, continued growth in the general environment, exposure over time … add a decade or two for search of these

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Perfluorinated compounds do not biodegrade, and so the continued production of PFCs means more in the environment than ever before. Since we live in the environment, there are therefore more PFCs in our bodies than ever before.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

It just doesn't degrade and that is why we find them so usefull. Pfas dumped 50 years ago is still around and we just keep producing more.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago

Its because we have poisioned our enviorment. Between PFAS, microplastics, pesticides, preservatives and prolly 100 other factors...

[–] HootinNHollerin 18 points 11 months ago

Blame deregulation

[–] egeres 5 points 11 months ago (3 children)

How's the regulation feeling about BPA nowadays? I've seen contradictory research saying it is and it's not carcinogenic

[–] TheFarm 4 points 11 months ago

Not sure about BPA, but we're closer to knowing what BPA does than what BPS does. We just replaced a somewhat studied plasticizer for an even less studied and understood one. Plasticizers never went away.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

The ones with the most money win the narrative

[–] Ibex0 2 points 11 months ago

We can simply stop putting it in food if there's a hint it's bad. It's so simple, bit somebody would lose a few bucks.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

"Baffled"? Really?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Could COVID also be a cause? I've read that the number of young people with heart problems has increased significantly.

[–] solrize 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

https://www.ajmc.com/view/kashyap-patel-md-sees-link-between-covid-19-and-cancer-progression-calls-for-more-biomarker-testing

... Patel is now on a mission to put concrete numbers to what he acknowledges are clinic-level observations, and to find a way to help patients most at risk. There is evidence to support Patel’s observation that SARS-CoV-2 can set off inflammatory responses in tumors, causing cancer to progress much sooner and more aggressively, and even reawaken dormant cancer cells.

[–] RestrictedAccount 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] piecat 1 points 11 months ago

Stomach cancer isn't usually caused by smoking

[–] riodoro1 2 points 11 months ago

Im baffled. All this close to nature healthy lifestyle gave us this?

[–] MaximilianKohler 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I'm guessing it is mostly due to stress, economic factors post pandmic

load more comments
view more: next ›