this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
363 points (96.4% liked)

Antique Memes Roadshow

6108 readers
3 users here now

Giving you the backstory and appraisals of vintage memes!

Submissions should be vintage memes or commentary about vintage memes. Commenters are advised to appraise the internet value and provenance meme antiquities.

Rules:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 53 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I still like Harry Potter and don't blame people for still enjoying it, it's just too bad the writer sucks ass. Imo if you wanna still play Harry Potter games, or watch the movies, go pirate them. You get to enjoy the series without giving the writer money. Win-win imo.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago

Or buy them used, or have a friend bring them over, the possibilities are endless

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I got the game from the library. Fun times, no money!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Library books aren't free. They are paid for by the library and the author gets a payment per lend (called Public Lending Rights). Not sure how it works for games, but I would be shocked if it's not a similar system.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not for games, but for books you can just read them at the library. No lend, no payment.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Good point! There's still the initial payment, but that's absolutely minimal!

[–] [email protected] 25 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Guys, you can acknowledge that the author is a dick without boycotting the thing you love so much outright. Think about it: how many other authors, actors, directors, painters,. musicians are massive dicks in the wildest ways? Enjoying their work doesn't make you a bigot, yet that one terf and her wizard books are off limits somehow. Yes, paying for her stuff will give her royalties, yet have you looked at the hoards of money she possesses? Gringot's absolutely not stereotypical jew-goblins would love to take that. The dollar she gets from your purchase will not matter in any way, but enjoying stories that offer some relief and enable you to forget this problem-ridden dumpster fire we have turned our world into will make your life better. So, don't die on a hill where no one will even notice your sacrifice.

[–] nickhammes 21 points 11 months ago

I was a big fan throughout my child and teen years, but seeing her not only descend into bigotry, but use her large platform to push that bigotry really made it hard for me to enjoy HP going forward. I don't blame myself for having enjoyed it in the past, but it puts a significant cloud over the series in my mind into the future; yeah, supporting her is a drop in the bucket, but a small share in the large harm she's seeking to make with her platform is something that very much doesn't appeal to me.

Her actions are much more visible, and much more impactful on the wider world than someone like William Shatner or Chevy Chase apparently being notorious jerks, and have soured me much more on her work than either of them have on theirs. And there are plenty of other things in the world worth enjoying that don't have this kind of shadow cast over them.

[–] EnderMB 17 points 11 months ago (2 children)

IIRC, the royalties side of things is strange when it comes to Harry Potter, in that derived works (i.e. same universe, not referencing the main characters) don't pay out to Rowling in the same way. It probably explains why there has been an influx under WB lately of Harry Potter themed stuff that's detached from the storyline.

Regardless, if you were to boycott everything due to the dodgy actions and beliefs of the creator, you'd probably need to boycott everything in your life. You probably wouldn't be able to use a laptop because Gates is a nonce, and Jobs was scum - and you'd probably need to rethink Linux as Linus Torvalds has been a serial bully for decades. You probably couldn't listen to any music, or read any book published before a certain point.

As someone that likes the Ender's Game series of books, I know all about shitty authors, but ultimately all you can do is enjoy the output, and be critical of the author.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

Very true. Like refueling your car probably help slavery in the middle east a tiny bit, buying any clothes funds sweatshops somewhere and eating chocolate also enables slavery where ever. Rowling is a tiny drop in the ocean of all the bad shit everyone are already passively funding.

There's zero ethical consumption in capitalism and boycotts of massive global brands like this are as effective as trying to empty the ocean with a bucket. If you want to enact real change then join a union, volenteer at a soup kitchen or do work for a political party you believe in.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Can’t even use TempleOS.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

She actively and explicitly funds services to exclude trans people and she uses her ongoing popularity as vindication for her actions.

It doesn't matter how you spin it, if you're putting money in her pocket, you're helping her hurt trans people. Anything you tell yourself otherwise is just lying to yourself...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I agree that enjoying her work doesn't necessarily make you a biggot, but it does mean you aren't an ally. Your money absolutely does make a difference. She sees continued support of her works as support of her anti-trans ideas.

[–] DillyDaily 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Also, what I loved about HP has changed, what I see in the original source material can't be unchanged. I loved the magic, the opportunity, the hope and the underlying messages of love and found family.

But I don't see those things anymore when I re-engage with the source material. They're still there on the surface, sure, but now I know more about the author I can't unsee the racist undertones, the issues surrounding gender roles and the failed allegorys for homosexuality. It was there the whole time, and I was blissfully ignorant as a teenager reading these books, and that's why okay, but as an adult, I can't go back. What I loved about HP isn't there anymore, and trying to read other again through the child like lens makes me feel uncomfortable because it's like I'm closing my eyes, sticking my fingers in my ears and convincing myself that it's okay to be complicit engaging with bigotry.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Neil Cicierega is a treasure.

[–] Telodzrum 18 points 11 months ago

IDK it's still pretty big in most not-terminally-online places.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I have never read Harry Potter, but I have held a slight resentment for it ever since the first movie. I had a similar, but not quite as bad, haircut as Harry and similar, but not quite as bad, eyeglasses as Harry at the time that the movie came out.

The last time I went out for Halloween, I went dressed as a samurai. Pretty authentically, in fact, with the hakama and haori and all but with the exception of having a bokken (wooden practice sword) instead of an actual katana. This was a couple of years later, I think.

Multiple people asked me if I was Harry Potter.

I could not express my disappointment.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

I had so many people point at me and say "look, it's Harry potter" to their kids whenever a movie was in theater.

All I had was a scar and a bad haircut. No glasses at all.

If I were older, I'd definitely go out of my way to make them feel bad for pointing out something I was self conscious over like it's some kind of costume jewelry.