this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
126 points (96.3% liked)

politics

20440 readers
4081 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A voter in Iowa pressed Republican presidential candidate Ron DeSantis on Wednesday over why he hasn’t directly “gone after” former President Trump, citing DeSantis’s falling poll numbers.

The voter, in the audience of a campaign stop in Waukee, Iowa, asked DeSantis, “One, why haven’t you gone directly after him [Trump]? Your polls are down. He’s up really —”

DeSantis, also the governor of Florida interjected, “What do you mean by going directly after?”

“In my viewpoint, you’ve gone pretty soft on him,” the voter replied.

all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 59 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They can't piss off the cult.

It's amusing how they all spend time campaigning for Trump as they pretend to campaign for themselves.

[–] dhork 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They've been campaigning to be Trump's VP pick all this time.

The joke's on them, though: I think he will pick Elise Stefanik. She's the only Republican who has ruined more Universities than he has.

[–] FlyingSquid 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think he will either pick Kari Lake or Vivek Ramaswamy. I think he personally wants Vivek based on how he keeps saying what a great guy Vivek is and because he "doesn't like losers," but I am guessing Kari Lake is being pushed hard as what I am sure they think of as "competition" with Kamala Harris for women's votes.

[–] dhork 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We all know that Trump won't make that decision until the last minute, likely swayed by the last person to talk to him. But if Trump is told he needs to pick a woman, he would go with Stefanik over Lake. Stefanik hasn't lost an election, has stood up for him in Congress, and most importantly, is around Ivanka's age (a bit younger even), so is more likely to be his "type"....

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 6 points 1 year ago

Maybe he’ll make a reality show that all the networks will kill to buy.

[–] Zombiepirate 51 points 1 year ago (2 children)

DeSantis briefly looked up from licking Trump's shoes and said "I'm almost through the outer layer; he's gonna hate that," before returning to his distasteful task.

Next he plans on sending Trump a McChicken, because he doesn't like those as much as the berders. That should send the message loud and clear!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Masterfully done.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I mean, it's not like he's going to send him a whopper, that's crazy talk.

[–] IchNichtenLichten 27 points 1 year ago

"Because I'm an abject coward who is terrified of his deranged cult members, you silly goose."

[–] kerrigan778 19 points 1 year ago

He is trying to avoid getting purged if Trump wins

[–] xc2215x 8 points 1 year ago

Either wanting to be the VP or afraid of supporters of him.

[–] cyd 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The answer, of course, is that he hopes to pick up Trump supporters in the event of Trump suddenly dropping dead. We can call this the Big Mac route to the Presidency. And it's why DeSantis and Haley are mostly going after each other.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A voter in Iowa pressed Republican presidential candidate Ron DeSantis on Wednesday over why he hasn’t directly “gone after” former President Trump, citing DeSantis’s falling poll numbers.

The voter, in the audience of a campaign stop in Waukee, Iowa, asked DeSantis, “One, why haven’t you gone directly after him [Trump]?

The voter interrupted with multiple “no’s” to indicate this is not what he implied before pointing to Trump’s criticism of Carly Fiorina, who he once called “horse face.”

DeSantis, along with some of his rivals in the GOP primary race, has faced criticism over what some perceive as not strong enough attacks on Trump, who maintains a comfortable lead in the GOP primary polls.

DeSantis has struggled to make a significant dent in Trump’s lead and recently saw his second place standing in the race threatened by the surge of former United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley.

When it comes to general election polling, Trump and President Biden remain virtually in a dead heat, though Trump appears to be taking a slight lead in some recent surveys.


The original article contains 364 words, the summary contains 176 words. Saved 52%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!