this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
691 points (99.4% liked)

News

23302 readers
3240 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NOT_RICK 257 points 10 months ago (11 children)

I love that the main criticism is that this will cause the ultra wealthy to leave the state. That just seems like a reason to implement this nationwide rather than at the state level.

[–] Kalysta 138 points 10 months ago (2 children)

What, the people who buy elections are fleeing? Sign me up for that.

[–] NOT_RICK 73 points 10 months ago (13 children)

I mean, an eroding tax base is a problem. I just think the solution is to drag them kicking and screaming to pay back into the system that enabled them to become so stinking rich rather than chasing them off/eating them. The Guillotine of the first French Republic sure did feel good until the reign of terror rolled in.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I remember seeing this argument about billionaires and corporations leaving the US if they are taxed fairly at a national level. If that were the case then 1. The US wouldn’t lose out on revenue it wasn’t losing out on already, and 2. The “free market” or the government would adapt to fill the abandoned niche.

[–] AbidanYre 43 points 10 months ago (21 children)

And anyplace worth living already has a higher tax rate anyway.

[–] afraid_of_zombies 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Besides we would all be better off if people like that left. Human happiness levels off around 110k per year, on average in the US. If there really are people who would give up all the things that make normal people happy just to add a marginal amount to their net worth, do we really want them?

We have all unfortunately met someone like this. Someone who cuts the line at an all you can eat buffet. All the food you could possibly want and they are angry that someone else might possibly get slightly more of something. And that isn't fair. Someone who has a fake job with almost no work and tries to find ways out of that even token tasks.

Let them leave.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AA5B 5 points 10 months ago

Massachusetts was already relatively high tax, high cost of living

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago

There are already places (in the U.S. and other countries entirely) with far, far lower taxes than MA. Why haven't rich people moved already?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yea except I'm sure our federal government would just blow it on more missles and bullets. At least here it's doing good things like feeding kids.

[–] qbus 10 points 10 months ago

Fun fact! Where do you think those missiles are designed? It's not all universities in Boston.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (4 children)

It did happen to New Jersey, Norway and France. Rich people leave when you tax them. I'm not arguing against the law, but to prevent "flight of the rich", the law has to be applied universally. Or if that can't happen, do what Norway did, tax wealth flight.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Kethal 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Even if it's not implemented nation wide, there's the implication that the state is losing something by these people leaving. I suspect they're contributing little by being there though.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] RalphFurley 194 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I voted for this. There was a lot of outright blatant lies on the commercials against this.

I forgot it even passed until my kid started kindergarten in the fall and during registration we were told starting that year all school lunches are free.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Wow, imagine living in a functioning society... And that's just a taste.

[–] bbuez 9 points 10 months ago

Holy fuck I want more

[–] [email protected] 47 points 10 months ago

This is what you get when you curbstomp conservatives at the polls:

P R O G R E S S

[–] A7thStone 69 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If they want to leave then good riddance. If you aren't willing to contribute to society then go live on a deserted island.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago (2 children)

They tried this before with the Minerva Reefs. It was, in fact, not their land to take and they folded like a folding chair. Google it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm an international student in MA, I remember getting SMS spam telling me to vote against it since it is aimed against retired people and veterans. Don't ask me how

[–] Blooper 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Because there's probably a significant number of affected rich folks who are retirees, vets, or both. Though, the propane you saw insinuates that it's the other way around - that a significant number of retirees and vets would be targeted by the new law. It's a pretty common tactic used against dumb people who can't tell the difference. Good on you for seeing through it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] solrize 44 points 10 months ago (3 children)

This appears to be a tax on regular income, but I thought that very rich people set up their finances so that their income appeared as carried interest, capital gains, etc. Are those subject to this tax?

[–] jeffw 48 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

According to this article I found, capital gains count as income for Massachusetts state taxes:

https://www.svb.com/private-bank/insights/managing-taxes/latest-tax-update-understanding-and-mitigating-the-massachusetts-millionaires-tax

Edit: just realized the bank I linked to lol

[–] Iampossiblyatwork 22 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Capital gains is always taxed at your normal bracket for holdings less than a year old and fall under special long term brackets for holdings >1 year. Those brackets are much smaller than income.

Capital gains isn't the issue. The issue is people taking out loans against their securities or other assets at often very affordable rates (until recently). Those loans are their income, the interest on those loans are deductible and they never have to sell their assets.

As long as interest paid is lower than taxes on capital gains the behavior will never shift.

[–] Mamertine 14 points 10 months ago

For readers who want to learn more:

https://smartasset.com/investing/buy-borrow-die-how-the-rich-avoid-taxes

I heard about it last year on a podcast. It's apparently very common among the ultra wealthy.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

The tax is on all taxable income not just regular wage income. Capital gains and carried interest are taxable income. They are subject to the tax if they make over the $1mil annually.

Capital gains are taxed less than regular wage income. Max capital gain rate is 20% while the max wage income tax rate is 37%.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 10 months ago (1 children)

About fucking time now the feds should do the other 49 states. But we all know that will never happen.

[–] Lemminary 8 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Progressive states could! Fed states, on the other hand, are still grappling with whether or not women are considered people.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] werefreeatlast 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Tax them until they wanna move to Mexico... see if they prefer paying taxes over loosing a finger 🤘. Sometimes the kid nappers send a finger. If you don't pay they send the rest of the body in installments. But paying taxes is too burdensome I suppose.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago

Billionaire named finger

[–] gedaliyah 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

People out here saying "Taxachusetts" like that's a bad thing lol!

[–] Chocrates 10 points 10 months ago

Article says that the wealthy are "fleeing" Mass. Even if that is true, if we did this in every state then they wouldn't have anywhere to run to. Even if they fled the United States, more power too them. If they don't want to help fund this country then they don't need to use its services.

[–] fne8w2ah 16 points 10 months ago

Who knew that taxes aren't the devil?

load more comments
view more: next ›