this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
403 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19223 readers
2879 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 36 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Too bad he won't do anything.

What, exactly, is within his sole power to do?

The answer is: Nothing. The president (or even the executive branch) has no power over tax laws whatsoever. That's 100% Congress. The president can only sign into law or veto what Congress sends them. Aside from Executive Orders (which are still subject to judicial review), all the president can do is call for things.

And he is only calling for it now because it wouldn't have made sense to do it any earlier. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (better known as the Trump Tax Cuts for the Wealthy), became effective in 2018 and is the law until 2025 when they're due to be renewed or replaced. Biden took office in 2021 and the current year is 2024.

instead of ranting about "illegals"

The "ranting about illegals" statement is completley disingenuous and quite literally spreading right-wing propaganda.

From the official transcript of the damn speech (or rant as you're calling it):

REPRESENTATIVE GREENE: What about Laken Riley?
(Cross-talk.)
AUDIENCE: Booo —
REPRESENTATIVE GREENE: Say her name!
THE PRESIDENT: (The President holds up a pin reading “Say Her Name, Laken Riley.”) Lanken — Lanken (Laken) Riley, an innocent young woman who was killed.
REPRESENTATIVE GREENE: By an illegal!
THE PRESIDENT: By an illegal. That’s right. But how many of thousands of people are being killed by legals?

That's it. That's the "rant". Basically trapped into responding to Empty G's heckling, fell into it, and now it's a right-wing talking point.

Here's the full transcript if you don't trust my copy/paste skills: https://www.whitehouse.gov/state-of-the-union-2024/

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Plant very convincing notes in the lapels of every fortune 500 companies CEOs?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I mean, that's close.

Tax reform has to be implemented by Congress. All he can do is call for it. And good luck with that out of the current Congress. The only chance of that happening is if Dems get the House back and get a bigger/actual majority in the Senate.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

An actual majority in both houses plus the President's signature is all it takes to actually change tax rates for the wealthy — you can do it under reconciliation. The problem for Democrats is that there have long been a few who are bought off, so it takes more than a bare majority to do it.

[–] Wrench 13 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The problem for Democrats is that there have long been a few who are bought off, so it takes more than a bare majority to do it.

Exactly why it's important to get out and vote blue.

Are they perfect? Absolutely not. And Manchin/Sinema did some heavy lifting in disenfranchising voters to think the Dems are useless.

But when 95% of the party is in line, but fails to get the majority because of two assholes, the answer isn't to abandon the party, it's to vote more in so that the two assholes don't have the ability to derail the train by themselves.

At lleast, when the alternative is to hand the keys over to a party actively trying to destroy the country for their own selfish gain. And they aren't even being subtle about it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago
[–] go_go_gadget -3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What's the answer when "the most progressive president in American history" actively fights and sabotages progressive and leftist efforts?

Called on congress to block the rail strike: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/biden-calls-on-congress-to-block-potential-railroad-strike

Walks back his own campaign promise for $50k forgiveness: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/539139-biden-balks-at-50k-student-loan-forgiveness-plan/

Goes around congress to sell weapons to Israel: https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/29/politics/biden-congress-israel-military-aid/index.html

Forced federal workers back to office: https://www.cnn.com/2023/04/13/politics/in-person-work-biden-administration/index.html

Increased the defense budget: https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/28/politics/defense-budget-biden-administration/index.html

[–] Wrench 4 points 9 months ago

Oh, fuck off with your copy paste crap already

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago

Yep. That's how we got the current tax plan which heavily favors the wealthy, and it's the only thing the R's did when they had full control.