this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
836 points (98.6% liked)

196

17133 readers
3053 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Linkerbaan 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You were talking to a moron then. Because Apartheid South Africa doesn't exist anymore.

Here's an amazing conversation which answers your question https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69pEzsfX8Aw

[–] Hamartia 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And all the countries that kicked off colonial rule in the C20th. Sure a lot of them got refucked in the long run but they were ostensibly successful revolutions.

[–] Linkerbaan 2 points 1 year ago

Even those countries that are now financial colonies are starting to break loose from the IMF with BRICS. Of course that has its own problems, but our monopoly on colonialism is starting to shake.

[–] menemen 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not sure if this can be compared to a revolution against local rulers. Wasn't the main reason for the success of many of the initial revolutions against colonial rulers that keeping the colonies became to expensive? The colonies were mostly business ventures for the colonial powers after all.

How can we take a lesson from this for local revolutions?

[–] Hamartia 1 points 1 year ago

I would have thought any successful revolution would need for the state to be wobbling in some fashion.