this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
356 points (96.8% liked)

196

16296 readers
2260 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dlpkl 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

You mean hydrodynamic. Fuck me, imagine if those things could fly

[–] funnystuff97 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Not a mechanical engineer, but as I understand fluid dynamics (which admittedly isn't much):

Aerodynamics and hydrodynamics are both branches of fluid dynamics, the fluids in question obviously being air and water. But the difference with them lies mostly in their Reynold's Number. Particularly, if you scale your model accordingly between the different fluids w.r.t. each Reynold's Number, you'll find that the dynamics behave similarly. As in, you can test an airplane wing underwater and expect appropriate results.

Which I suppose means a hydrodynamic lobster could theoretically imply an aerodynamic lobster. I think.

[–] AEsheron 2 points 9 months ago

The short version is the two should be relatively closely related, most things that are one will likely be the other. Not always true, but a decent rule of thumb.