this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
1852 points (98.0% liked)

Comic Strips

12987 readers
1629 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thrawn21 166 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Somehow, I can tolerate "jpheg" much easier than the forsaken "jif."

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Jif is where it's at. Peanut butter and image format? Yes please

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (4 children)

But Jif in Australia is a cleaning solution - can we have different pronunciations based on country?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

No need, it's Gif. Heathens be damned.

[–] phobiac 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Y'all love diminutives, call them jiffies?

[–] Nihilore 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Jiffy is already an abstract measurement of time though

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Sounds more than fair. We can't agree to a person on our sounds anyway.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

No. You cannot.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The creators literally referenced this early on "choosy devs choose gif" like the jiff peanut butter commercial.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

this goes deeper than I thought!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, and that’s stupid.

It’s not ‘Jraphical Image Format’. Gah!!!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Tier1BuildABear 8 points 1 year ago

That's a lot of peanut butter

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (4 children)

You don't pronounce the word for imagery as "jrafics?" How odd.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Stupid long horses

[–] Waluigis_Talking_Buttplug 9 points 1 year ago

Do you also pronounce origin like Oregon

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

By that standard, the comic is right and we should say j-feg

[–] themeatbridge 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

"Jif" is the original pronunciation. It is a pun, a play on the word "jif" short for "jiffy" meaning a short amount of time, as in "I'll send it to you in a gif". The newer pronunciation has become popular based on the fallacious reasoning that an acronym should be pronounced the same as its constituent words, which isn't a thing at all.

Language evolves, and both pronunciations are common enough to be considered acceptable. The only way to be wrong about how to pronounce the word is to claim one of the pronunciations is wrong.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Become popular? It's been popular roughly for the lifespan of the format. It's hardly language's fault the developer wanted to make an unfunny reference to a since forgotten peanut butter slogan.

On the other hand linguistics indicate a hard g sound with the construction of the word, constituent words aside. Plenty of four letter words starting with the gi combo have a hard g, including but not limited to gift which you may notice is very similarly constructed.

Whatever else the English language may throw at us, people appreciate consistency because we can make some sense of the world. A hard g is the consistent, predictable, sensible choice for the limited availability of those virtues English offers.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There exists other words that start with gi but use the soft g, gin for example. But regardless, the pronunciation of one word is not determined by the pronunciation of other unrelated words.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

But regardless, the pronunciation of one word is not determined by the pronunciation of other unrelated words.

In English? Yes. In other, more structured and sane languages? No.

[–] themeatbridge 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Become popular? It's been popular roughly for the lifespan of the format.

I'm gonna stop you there, because I've been using the format for about 30 years, and people only started using the new pronunciation in the last 10-15.

Everything you said about linguistics is entirely crap. English is not a proscriptive language. English linguistics doesn't indicate anything at all. It is descriptive, and is anything but consistent. There are no rules about word construction or pronunciation. Words are pronounced the way they are understood, and if you are understood then you have pronounced them correctly.

You could argue that the original pronunciation is archaic, like "encyclopaedia," but the problem there is that the word itself is like 35 years old, and there are people like me who have been using the word since there was only one acceptable pronunciation who aren't likely to change.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I’m gonna stop you there, because I’ve been using the format for about 30 years, and people only started using the new pronunciation in the last 10-15.

I've been using the word since the mid 90s and it's always been hard G for me.

I don't say that to suggest that you or anyone else are wrong to say it with a soft G (although my brain cringes each time I hear it), but since I don't think I invented the hard G pronunciation I think claiming it's a recent thing is a fallacious argument against the hard G.

[–] themeatbridge 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nobody invented the mispronunciations, it just happens, which is why the manual included a guide. The inventor of the word (and the format) had to tell people how it was pronounced and why he chose the name, just like every other brand name.

What is recent is the fallacious arguments related to how acronyms are supposed to be pronounced, part of a larger trend towards obstinate and belligerent defense of an objectively and demonstrably false argument. The internet has made people feel like their opinions are just as valid as facts.

In the 90s, we nerds used technical terms like a shiboleth to separate other nerds from what the French call "les incompétents." But it's unlikely anyone would have corrected you back then, because doing so was considered impolite and elitist.

I see it as part of what Colbert called "truthiness." There is no rule for how the word should be pronounced, but it feels like there should be, which is why the argument is so often repeated. The feeling of being right is more important than the reality of ambiguity, and people seek out validation of their presuppositions. It's that overconfidence that fosters animosity towards debate, which is why people get so heated about silly things like this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (11 children)

people only started using the new pronunciation in the last 10-15.

As someone else pointed out already, this is untrue. While it may not have been popular in your circles, it definitely was in others. I've been saying it with a hard g as long as you have with a soft and I'm not the originator either.

English linguistics doesn't indicate anything at all.

They absolutely do. That's why you can sound out a word you've never seen before. You may not always be right when you do because they indicate, they don't define.

There are no rules about word construction or pronunciation.

There are, there are just exceptions. For example, an e at the end of the word is silent. I'm certain you can give me a word where it's not, but there are at least six in this paragraph alone where it is.

if you are understood then you have pronounced them correctly

In this logic if someone has been pronouncing a word all their life with a single pronunciation and travels to another location with a much different accent they can only now be pronouncing the word wrong.

If understanding is also the only metric then a hard g would still be preferable. Not only does a written g tend to make people lean to a hard g in my experience, but there's more words that could be mistaken for a soft g pronunciation.

You could argue that the original pronunciation is archaic,

Could I not argue that the original pronunciation has fallen out of favor?

the word itself is like 35 years old

Is there a time requirement for pronunciations to become archaic?

since there was only one acceptable pronunciation

Which isn't a time that existed, as we've established

who aren't likely to change.

Given your stance on language this is absolutely a you problem. If the rest of us collectively decided to understand it as only with a hard g, you would not be understood and therefore be pronouncing it wrong by your own logic.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are, there are just exceptions. For example, an e at the end of the word is silent. I’m certain you can give me a word where it’s not, but there are at least six in this paragraph alone where it is.

One of the most common words with a final "e" in that paragraph is "the" which not only has a final "e" sound, but has two different final "e" sounds depending on the context: "the end" uses a /ði/ pronunciation but "the word" uses a /ðə/ pronunciation. English is very stupid.

But, I agree with your assessment. English has rules, or at least patterns. "G" is most often hard, not soft, because "J" is available for the soft version, but there's no alternative for the hard version. English tends to follow patterns, and "gift" has a hard g, and it (and words based on it) are the only ones that start with "gif", so every "gif" word is hard. Because "t" (unlike "e") can't change the sounds before it, the pattern says that "gif" should have a hard "g".

If it were "gir", then there would be more debate. The word "giraffe" has a soft "g" but "girl" has a hard one, so the pattern is more muddy.

Also, people who coin words don't get to decide how they'll be pronounced. They can certainly try, but they'll often lose. There are plenty of words in English borrowed from other languages that not only sound nothing like the original language, but that sound nothing like they'd sound if they were English words. For example, "lingerie". It's a French word, but the English pronunciation sounds nothing like a French word. In fact, if someone just sounded out the word as if it were an English word, they'd probably get much closer to the French pronunciation than the awful "lawn-je-ray" which is the current accepted English pronunciation (though, they'd probably assume a hard "g" sound).

In this case, it's too bad that Steve Wilhite didn't have a background in linguistics or he would have realized that people would see "gif" and assume a hard "g". It was a losing fight from the start because he either didn't understand the assumptions people would have when they saw those letters, or he thought that somehow he could successfully fight the tide all by himself.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Your illustration using the word “the” here is awesome. Particularly the alternative pronunciations. I would also like to add the well known words “be”, “he”, “she” and “me” into the mix.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

an unfunny reference to a since forgotten peanut butter slogan.

Yep. Jiffy is only used for peanut butter. Great point!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

You can find plenty of places where the claim is that it's a soft g because "choosey devs choose gif".

Where jiffy is used is irrelevant in that case.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

It's been popular in use but casual everyday people weren't always bringing them up in conversation.

English is not consistent, accept that. You can say gif but I'll continue to call it gif.

[–] assassin_aragorn 3 points 1 year ago

English is not consistent, accept that.

This is the real answer. Both are correct and that's that. It can be gif as in image, or gif as in graphic.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] STUPIDVIPGUY 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's Gif and I don't care what anyone says

[–] Riccosuave 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't care either. Now excuse me while I go gerk off.

[–] RobertOwnageJunior 14 points 1 year ago
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh yeah well I say drink more Ovaltine

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Why do they call it Ovaltine? The container is round. The mug is round. They should call it Roundtine.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

The approximately equal amount of upvotes and downvotes this comment received pretty much sums up the entire gif wars.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The newer pronunciation has become popular based on

The newer pronunciation has become popular based on their internalization of the obscure patterns of English pronunciation, informed by the most similar word: "gift" which uses a hard g. Everyone I know of started saying it with a hard g because that's what made sense based on the spelling, long before hearing the weird thing about constituent words.

Nobody pronounced LASER as Lah-seer, which you'd have to do if you used "A as in Amplification" an "E as in Emission".

[–] themeatbridge 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

OK but there are other similar words that start with gi like giraffe and gigolo, but really that's not why I or anyone I knew in the 90s started using the soft g to say "gif." We did so because we learned about the format, and said "Neat, what's it called?" and they said "it's called a gif" because that was the name of the format. We didn't debate the pronunciation because it had been given a name, the same way you don't ask a person you just met "Shouldn't 'Bob' be pronounced with a long 'o' like the very similar name 'Job'? I'm going to call you 'Bobe' because that makes more sense to me." You'd have to be a massive douche to say that out loud to a person who had just introduced themselves.

If someone said it with the hard "g" we just nodded and went about our day because it doesn't matter, we knew what they probably meant and they just hadn't read the manual.

Pronunciations change over time, and that's good. Language is a function of communication, and better communication is what enabled humans to transfer knowledge. If someone uses the soft g, you know the word they're saying, and I know you're probably not saying the word "gift" from context. We're communicating either way, and we don't have to pronounce every word the same.

Case in point, I don't say "emission" with a long "e" sound, I say "ehmission" because it doesn't matter that much.

The only way to be wrong is to claim that someone else is saying it wrong.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“Neat, what’s it called?” and they said “it’s called a gif”

Yeah, and then we all assumed it was pronounced "gif" not "jif" because the only other word with the letters "gif" was "gift" and that had a hard g. Later on, someone claimed it was supposed to be pronounced "jif", but we all laughed at that idea and kept using the correct pronunciation.

We didn’t debate the pronunciation because it had been given a name

Neither did we, it was a hard g. There was no debate. Sure, some people claimed it was supposed to be a soft g, but we all laughed at that idea because it was ridiculous.

We didn’t debate the pronunciation because it had been given a name, the same way you don’t ask a person you just met “Shouldn’t ‘Bob’ be pronounced with a long ‘o’ like the very similar name ‘Job’?

I'm guessing you're not multilingual then, because I am, and it's extremely common to change how someone's name is pronounced. People with the name "David" who are French are used to the French pronunciation of their name being "Dah-veed" but in English "Day-vid". French people pronounce "Bob" as "Bub". It's good to allow people to slightly change how your name is pronounced because it flows better in their language. If they have to pause every time your name comes up to adapt how it's said, it just makes things more difficult.

As for "gif", if someone pronounced it as "jif", we giggled a bit, but that's it. It was only if someone was really insistent that it had to be a soft g that we really laughed. Some people tried to claim that the creator of the format had wanted a certain pronunciation, but we knew that didn't matter.

Language is a function of communication, and better communication is what enabled humans to transfer knowledge

Exactly, and part of good communication is good pronunciation, because if you mispronounce things it makes it harder for people to understand you. If you insist on using a nonsensical pronunciation then you're just trying to make it hard to communicate with you.

[–] force 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

That is the most anti-linguistic take ever lmao. There is no such thing as an objectively correct pronunciation, both pronunciations of "gif" are valid in the context of most English conversations.

On another note, the guy who created it said it's pronounced /dʒɪf/, so if any pronunciation is more "correct" it's the one you hate. It's not "some people tried to claim", that's what it actually is "correctly" pronounced like according to the only one that can come close to being considered an authority on what the correct pronunciation is.

Your comment being so pretentious and stuck-up about you not liking a pronunciation leads me to believe you're making the whole "we" thing up, and instead of a group of people being dumbasses and laughing at a correct pronunciation, it was just one person (you) malding about it in their head. Because being the kind of person to actually laugh at something like that in real life, face to face, would be too embarrassing for anyone to actually go through with it. God even just reading your comment makes me feel like I'm looking at made-up Reddit stories again...

Also how people speaking other languages handle names doesn't have anything to do with this, there's a big difference between calling someone "wrong" for pronouncing a loanword differently than in the parent language because of the languages' phonetics & phonotactics not aligning with each other, and insisting that everyone else is "wrong" because their completely linguistically valid, common pronunciation challenges your understanding of the language.

Oxford uses /dʒɪf/ as the primary pronunciation with /gif/ as the secondary in most of their resources (although a lot don't specify a primary or secondary), Dictionary.com lists /dʒɪf/ as the primary pronunciation, some like Merriam-Webster list both equally, Cambridge less consistent but list both. Clearly the people who's job is language disagree with you, even if you don't want to ask for linguists to tell you, they literally make the language references you use. If you want to be stubborn and insist on being wrong, so be it.

You can now continue malding about the fact that you use the incorrect pronunciation for the rest of your life, since apparently that's how you see language.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

always remember that yiff is a valid option

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I don't like the color noise, so yeah it's fine with me.