this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
229 points (83.4% liked)

politics

19248 readers
2081 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Muslim and Arab Americans say their support was critical to Biden’s winning Michigan in 2020. Some warn they won’t back him again over his blanket support for Israel.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 138 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Wonder what they think Trump would have done differently.

[–] [email protected] 85 points 1 year ago

Seriously. Trump is advocating turning Gaza into a parking lot.

And it's not like Democrats have exactly been shy of their general support of Israel, if you've paid any attention at all. They just also happen to acknowledge that Palestinians are people, unlike most Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's possible to be angry at both Republicans and Democrats.

[–] [email protected] 80 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But you still must vote for the one likely to do you the least harm if you don't want to get fucked. White Biden sucks he's objectively better than Trump for Muslim Americans. Trump was talking about deporting and blocking them from entering.

[–] FMT99 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not everyone thinks from a position of harm reduction. If you see a president stand up and speak out in favor of (in your eyes) genocide then you may not react to that ”rationally".

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you're protest voting on principle but not also joining more... radical... organizations that are actually working towards your desires, you're just being foolish.

[–] FMT99 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lots of voters ate foolish. And there's something to be said for the fact that voting for the lesser evil keeps evil in power. Not saying that's me but I do understand the sentiment.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Which is why you either do something about it or suck it up and vote for the lesser.

Just don't do nothing and then pretend you're taking a stand.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago

I'm not convinced having a lost Roomba who utters racist bullshit and hands countries over to terrorist organizations is a good pick. If it's Biden and Trump again, I am either not going to vote or go third party. I cannot in good conscience vote for either of them.

[–] Red_October 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In a First Past the Post voting system, refusing to vote, or voting 3rd party, is numerically the same as an extra vote for the candidate you hate the most. It's just one more vote closer to victory that your opposition gets.

Neither party is great, there's plenty to dislike about both, but it's patently obvious that one is far more harmful than the other.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well it's not really numerically the same as voting for the candidate you hate the most, it's numerically the same as not voting. And to be honest, it really only matters if you're in a potential swing state. And I'm saying this as someone who still votes despite having lived in a deep red state where my presidential vote always doesn't matter (but I go anyway because down ballot votes do matter and I might as well vote the whole ballot).

[–] njm1314 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Muslim population is significant in certain swing states.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I agree, any loss of votes in a swing state could theoretically be significant.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Same, but a blue state. It really doesn't matter who I vote for, or if I vote at all, when it comes to the president. I can't remember the last time I enjoyed voting for president, and I've voted for decades. I often think about just bowing out of the whole voting scam, but then there's always local shit that gets me to do the deed.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In the sort of two-party system they have in the US, it really is one or the another

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And yet they both do the shit they accuse the other side of.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Republicans attempted a coup.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

So since Trump exists, we should be happy with mediocrity? Nothing will ever get fixed in this country with this binary political system.

[–] Diprount_Tomato 10 points 1 year ago

Well, geopolitics often go beyond party politics, or at least they should

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

but also to encourage them to leave the top of the ticket blank in protest

Per the article. They do the protest vote.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

And if that gets them Trump 2024, what do the smoothbrains think will improve for either Palestinians or Muslims in America?

Considering the guy is literally supporting deporting pro-Palestinian students, I think they've given it the typical amount of thought a modern theist gives anything.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

That's effectively a vote for whoever who hate most in the ticket. Not voting has consequences

[–] cabron_offsets 4 points 1 year ago

Grab em by the pussy?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Somehow he would have found a way to discriminate against all religions involved. He would have tried to make money from Israel over this situation and he would have stationed US troops in Gaza.