this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
526 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19100 readers
4227 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Rep. Paul Gosar said that the "homosexual-promoting" general "would be hung" in a better society.

Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ) called for the execution of General Mark Milley, the chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in a homophobic tirade this weekend.

In his newsletter this weekend – published to his Congressional website – Gosar accused Milley of being a “homosexual-promoting-BLM-activist” who delayed the military’s response to the January 6 riot. An election denier, Gosar has in the past claimed that he “started the revolution,” referring to the insurrection.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sailingbythelee 193 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If all the quotes in the article, both from Gosar and Trump, are correct, that's pretty outrageous. I didn't fact-check them.

In any case, I heard Milley interviewed by Fareed Zakaria about a week ago. You can tell that he is completely bemused by all these crazy Republicans accusing him of being "woke". He is an old, white, grizzled, buzz-cut, 45-year army general. He is the epitome of The Establishment. In any previous decade, he would have been a staunch conservative. But the Republicans have gone crazy and alienated all of the sane conservatives.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 year ago (4 children)

We need more than 2 political parties to fix this shit show now, I don't believe what we've got now is sustainable, especially on the right.

[–] partial_accumen 49 points 1 year ago

We almost had it when the Tea Party was spinning off into their own party. However, in a grab for relevancy the GOP agreed to drink their crazy KoolAid to maintain the bodies in the GOP.

[–] Etterra 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I like the Australian system better. It ain't perfect, but it is better imo. Regardless, dragging the conservatives kicking and screaming into modernity, much less the future, has thus far proven to be a mixed bag at best. The fact that they're currently backsliding is hard as they possibly can isn't helping.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

MMP is the "better" system.

No system is perfect. NZ went from First past the post (what the USA uses) to MMP.

The aus system is pretty good too, but still dominated by two parties.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's really three parties though, the Liberals have needed the Nationals quite often in order to gain the house. Plus last election we saw a surge in support for independents, who are actually being extremely effective in both Parliament and Senate. Lastly, year-on-year the Greens poach more from both sides as climate change becomes topical.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

"Vote for your preferred colour of neoliberal party"

[–] CharlesDarwin 6 points 1 year ago

One party is relatively conservative and the other is batshit insane and fascist. We need a party that represents the progressive majority in this country.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

FYI: There is the Forward party that is trying to get started. https://www.forwardparty.com/. They are focusing their efforts on 12 states local elections to start with. They are intentionally not trying to only compete at the federal level to start locally.

[–] TwoGems 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry to be petty but isn't he 65?

[–] jcit878 11 points 1 year ago

the 45 years refers to service term i believe

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't take issue with your point, but he's 65. I doubt there are many, if any, 45 year old 4 star generals.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Think he meant 45 years in the army. Could be wrong though.

[–] sailingbythelee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, I meant he has been in the army for 45 years. I worded it poorly.

[–] HonoraryMancunian 6 points 1 year ago

You didn't, people just misread it

[–] raynethackery -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] sailingbythelee 23 points 1 year ago

Haha, I worded that poorly. I meant to say that he's been in the military for 45 years.

[–] PetDinosaurs 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

After 30, it's straight downhill to the grave.

I heard it best: aging is when you wake up with a new pain and wonder if it's permanent.

Signed, An almost 40 yo.

[–] NABDad 1 points 1 year ago

It is.

Signed, a 53 yo.