politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
I'm not sure how anybody could have respect for someone, like Ellis, who was so completely illiterate to not be able to read the incredibly obvious writing on the wall. Trump didn't morph into a malignant narcissist. That's always been who he was. Hell - it's been his brand for as long as he's been in the public eye. To think that a malignant narcissist would choose to be grateful to you or treat you like a person and not a means to an end is the very height of hubris. Stupid, blind hubris.
I mean, the whole reason that malignant narcissists are successful is that they're very good at playing on their victims' emotions and deceiving. Even someone as trash as Trump, you see this steady stream of new victims both being willing to sacrifice their own social and professional lives on the altar of his ego and being shocked that he won't comply with contract terms or reciprocate with even a mild inconvenience. Imagine some dude standing next to a hot stove, saying it's not that hot and offering $100 to put a hand on it. Then when someone burns their hand, denying he ever made the offer.
Humans are terrible at rational decisions.
Well, the last guy probably cooled the stove down enough when he grabbed it so it should be fine for me.
Like Chris Christie, she supported him for 4 years and then only at the end was suddenly shocked to discover he was a bad guy. Of course he claims he soured on Trump after the Jan 6 insurrection and she broke with hm publicly only after she gets charged alongside him and faces mandatory minimum prison time.
I think she's virtue signaling for the court. Hoping to sway sentencing when it comes (or praying they let her off now that she sees Trump's a turd).
Could be that she's announcing that unless DJT starts paying for her lawyer she's going state's evidence.
Well I don't see DT doing that considering he can't pay for his own at this point.
I hope you're right about the states evidence.
She might not understand that he's cash-strapped.
I get the feeling that had they succeeded in overthrowing democracy as planned, she wouldn't be saying this right now. Take that for what you will.
Perhaps the only good thing I can ever say about Trump is how consistent he’s been this whole time. Consistently shitty, but consistent nonetheless. Granted, he makes decisions based on whatever the last person in the room convinced him to do and contradicts himself on a minute-by-minute basis, so he’s even shitty at consistency, but that’s just part of the consistent shittiness. It’s like a human centipede ouroboros.
She's not illiterate. She was blinded by her own greed.
I was being metaphorical with the "illiterate" comment. As in, she's not able to read the writing on the wall.
I know you were. Just like I was being metaphorical with the "blinded" comment.