this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
1356 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

59583 readers
6230 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Thanks to Popcrave https://twitter.com/popcrave/status/1691852136236327316?s=46&t=lcH0dp9biwkMEBKsRQeVeQ

Who here is going to put their ID and photo on X/Twitter

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 336 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Twitter aside, if any website or app ever asks this of you, please nope the fuck out.

[–] [email protected] 115 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I guess it only occasionally makes sense for government web sites and banks. X might have ambitions to become a bank, so in that sense it might make sense.

So another piece of advice: if twitter ever asks you if you want to start using it for banking, nope the fuck out.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

You Americans should get to this century and start performing digital strong authentications like the rest of us. Sending picture of your ID to anyone is insane :)

How we do it here in Finland is that there are digital identity providers which use bank/mobile carrier to identify you. They then use MFA when identifying you. Any service can use these services to do strong authentication for you. And they don't cost anything for the customer, and is really cheap for the company who wants to identify you. It is also build into the law that you must identify people using these, to avoid identity theft.

[–] [email protected] 97 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We're still trying to decide if slavery was wrong give us some time

[–] ShakeThatYam 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Half our country thinks that would be the mark of the Beast or some shit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How doss your bank identify you?

[–] somethingsnappy 4 points 1 year ago

When you walk in, the guy goes "hey Sam! I tupped your mom the other night."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

By the card they issued me when I opened the account.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (14 children)

But how did they authenticate your identity when you opened the account? I'd not trying to be an arse - but at some point it will likely have come back to matching some official photo id against your face.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Idk, I've got my hands in a lot of financial cookie jars, and I don't recall ever being asked for something like this. At the very least, not in this manner.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's pretty standard for European banks thanks to Know Your Customer laws.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you keep in mind that it’s only done with special certified subcontractors, then yes. I would never give that information directly to a company like X. And yes, also those special companies are more times shady than they should be, but still.

[–] Diprount_Tomato 13 points 1 year ago

Call it Twitter please

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

If you keep in mind that it’s only done with special certified subcontractors, then yes.

Dunno what you're talking about here but I've had to go through something similar every time I've opened a new account with a financial service.

But yeah, I would not trust Twitter/X either. Musk is too much of an emotional child following whatever whim takes his fancy that day.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know there's a similar-ish process for accessing Spanish social security services online at least, and I believe it's the same for some other services as well.

Then again, Spanish public services are not exactly the gold standard for digitalization.

[–] Diprount_Tomato 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait are you Spanish too? Those websites look like they've been made by a secretary's cousin that only knew how to copy and paste in the 90s

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just have a few Spanish friends! And from what they're telling me that's probably exactly how these websites were made.

[–] Diprount_Tomato 3 points 1 year ago

I mean, most public computers are very old too. Like 20 years old at leat

[–] qaz 3 points 1 year ago

I have the opposite experience but maybe it’s just different in the EU

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He's definitely pushing for Twitter to be the next WeChat.

[–] Diprount_Tomato 10 points 1 year ago

Can't wait for the social credit system

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To follow his dystopian vision of Twitter as the Everything app, in the US it will have to be a bank at some point. The same way that Apple is now a bank in order to power parts of their wallet and payment platforms.

[–] FlyingSquid 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PunnyName 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, PayPal sure as fuck ain't a bank. And the same douche started that.

[–] Cabrio 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Max Levchin, Peter Thiel, and Luke Nosek own Twitter?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The only government function that has ever wanted a "selfie" was for my drivers license and passport. Both of which feature that picture. But I've never done either through a site.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s stupid as well, because it’s impossible to authenticate an id or passport from a photo. You can just photoshop something and send that in.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

incorrect. it is actually fairly easy to authenticate an id or passport from a photo. Photoshopping something is easily spotted by a trained eye. Source i work as a document expert for an online ID verification company. the amount of fakes we spot each day are fairly large and its not all automatically processed. Also for those people that don't know where there data is proccesed. there are actually a lot of laws in place to protect your data for example for EU citizens

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, a bad photoshop can be spotted, but you can’t spot it if the forger put in just a little bit of effort. The fact that you can spot some fakes doesn’t mean you spot all fakes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So just ... photoshop and print a fake ID and ask a stranger to take a picture with it.

I doubt you will see the ID clearly enough to make out the photoshopped parts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only if you want to watch adult-themed videos, which they have been more lenient towards after the introduction of YouTube Kids and this measure. NewPipe and yt-dlp can still stream them, though, and you could also interact with the video (like, comment, save to playlists) using the official frontend last time I checked.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

More lenient?!

I like to watch people playing Hearts of Iron 4 (a WW2 strategy game) and most of the creators avoid saying "Hitler" to avoid getting demonetized and hit with an age check.

It's getting a lot worse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

What I meant is that fewer videos get removed when age-restricting them is an option. Demonetization of any keywords relating to objectionable topics is still ridiculous, though, especially when the company has major AI research labs that could figure out how to differentiate between use in historical context and propaganda. However, that does not pay the bills and they don’t need more users & creators to be happy about the platform.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then nope the fuck out of Hetzner then. They asked that of me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Outside of services where you need to access it (ex. school / exams / government services), one beneficial one might be dating apps. There's an advantage to being verified.

Although none of them ask for ID from what I understand, just "hold up 3 fingers and take a touch your nose" or something...

[–] Diprount_Tomato 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Now imagine if all websites did

load more comments (3 replies)