this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2025
256 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19582 readers
3543 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] halcyoncmdr 67 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Pretty sure California sends more funds to the federal government than they receive every year... Would be a shame if they just didn't do the back and forth and kept their funds to use as they see for instead.

I'm sure States like Alabama wouldn't miss that California tax revenue making it's way to them at all.

[–] Maggoty 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Calexit is approved for signature gathering. Trump might just push California right out.

[–] CharlesDarwin 6 points 3 days ago

I'd like to see Colorado in that mix.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Can Oregon join? Maybe Washington too.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

NY/VT/CT etc are fairly democratic and could likely form a coalition.
Anywhere else, fight or move. You're political refugees now.

[–] bhamlin 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm here for Oregone and Washingtoodaloo.

[–] werefreeatlast 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Me too..we could become South West Canada or stick to North West America....Pronounced NewAhh.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

"United States of Cascadia" has a decent ring.

Or just "Cascadia", I've heard it called before.

[–] AngryCommieKender 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Did you just call me an N'wah‽‽‽

[–] werefreeatlast 3 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

I’m sure States like Alabama wouldn’t miss that California tax revenue making it’s way to them at all.

Of course not. They're strongly against socialist policies like that.

[–] simplejack 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes, but to do this individual Californians would all have to stop paying federal income taxes.

[–] Madison420 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No they would need to pay them into bonds to comply with the Spirit of the law but not the letter of the law. When the federal government represents California again the bonds can be released.

[–] simplejack 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sure, but if individuals don’t pay the IRS, they can do all sort of shit, including garnishing your wages.

[–] Madison420 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They could certainly try but that requires actual enforcement and California has the economic power.

[–] simplejack 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure, but they can just target businesses with 668 form to garnish wages of employees, and if businesses don’t comply, they can fuck with the businesses ability to conduct national or international business.

[–] Madison420 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

California has its own ports, national guard and most of the United States naval power for that side of the planet. Again they can try, it's all well and good to say on paper but once red states light up in unrest because the government tap shuts off things get real unpredictable real fast.

[–] simplejack -2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The national guard is the federal reserve military and Trump can override any governor’s whenever. And given that the armed services tend to swing Republican, having them commit mass insubordination seems unlikely.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You guys are just describing the opening of a civil war. Both of you.

[–] simplejack 1 points 1 day ago

Just to clarify, I’m not arguing in support of CA withholding taxes or trying to obstruct with the guard. I’m arguing that both of those ideas are terrible and riddled with holes. But you’re right, those ideas are also dangerous.

[–] Madison420 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No. The national guard was a compromise to remove militias and this a large part of state autonomy. They are beholden to the state first and the federal government second, the national guard can be called by the president and a governor can refuse the order or recall troops if the order is contrary to "actual service of the United States".

Similarly military forces don't actually swing hard right, they're center right I'll agree there.

[–] simplejack -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Trump would just do what Eisenhower did in the late 50’s - use the Insurrection Act to federalize the Guard.

I’m all for a way to stick it to Trump, but not paying taxes doesn’t have an easy solution. The collection is done per person / household, enforcement can easily be done nationally by garnishing wages, and the guard can’t stop that.

[–] Madison420 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Bro you seen to misunderstand how payroll works.

If I work 8 hrs and get a paycheck that paycheck only has deductions because the payroll software calculated withholding and withheld it.

If I work the same 8hrs and my boss figures withholdings all they have to do it cut me a personal or business check for the correct amount and store the withholding of better yet the employee stores the withholding in bond.

Nothing is magically withheld automatically and teleported to the federal Treasury.

[–] dilroopgill -2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

so nice to not have to post this comment, never see this point on reddit or x

[–] b34k 8 points 3 days ago

Are you kidding me? I’ve seen this point in Reddit for a decade now. It comes up in r/politics all the time

[–] dilroopgill 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I finally called it x, accepting twitter is dead and never coming back lol, calling it twitters like a compliment or giving it way too much credit

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I call it xitter, pronounced shitter.

[–] AngryCommieKender 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Same, except I spell it xitler

[–] CharlesDarwin 1 points 2 days ago

This is the way.