this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
705 points (99.0% liked)
Lemmy Shitpost
27078 readers
4316 users here now
Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.
Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means:
-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
1.Memes
10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)
Reach out to
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It actually is Delay, Deny, Defend. The media is purposefully changing it so people won't find the book:
https://pdfupload.io/docs/0d380e9b
One is the title of the book, the other is the words he wrote on the shell casing.
Would it be wrong to assume there's a 4th casing out there somewhrre with "delay" on it, so our shooter's message would be "you do the first 3, we'll do the 4th"?
Probably rolled into a gutter.
Yeah that would make sense.
I'm pretty sure NBC, and ABC news, as well as several articles, have mentioned the similarity to the book title. Plus, deny, defend, depose has a VERY different statement.
"Deny claims, defend legally, remove from power." The insurance companies deny the claims, know they can avoid court because the insured can't possibly afford lawyers when they get buried under medical debt, and the last one has multiple purposes. Remove the power of medical professionals in their care expertise, remove the power of the patient's voice, and remove the insurance companies and executives from having this power.
However, I acknowledge that the media shills for the owner class, and I see where the suspicion that they would change the words to fit that agenda is very possible. Unfortunately, without seeing the bullets, we have no way to verify what the actual words are. The only way we get that is from NYPD's evidence storage which would need a criminal case.
Manufacturing Consent...
No. The meaning is clear. The media isn't outright lying to you on this.
Generally they don't outright lie. They may choose to cover some things more than others, or they may publish ridiculous opinion pieces, but the decent ones almost never outright lie.
Manufactured Consent isn't lying. It's selectively telling the truth either by omitting certain facts or reframing them. Here, it's omitting what those words are referring to.
The claim was lying.
No, they're not. I'm not invalidating Chomsky. I'm saying that's not this case in this particular instance.
I disagree. There might be enough room for plausible deniability, but that's by design. I do not trust the media enough not to take the side of the rich.
I thought I saw those on an very early article but they're all saying the other now. Be nice if we could find out what they really said.