this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
606 points (96.9% liked)

politics

19125 readers
2608 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson claimed he was “physically mauled” by a demon in his sleep, leaving claw marks on his body, which he says are still visible. Carlson described waking with intense pain, bleeding claw marks, and an overwhelming urge to read the Bible. He recounted the experience as confusing yet transformative, adding that while he doesn’t expect others to believe him, the incident profoundly impacted him.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 92 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I watched that video, and had he just stuck to being suddenly awake and having claw marks I would have thought there was something odd. But he led with having four dogs in the bed, so when he said he had claw marks...dear lord, he's either trying too hard to play to some niche audience, or he's really that stupid. At least make the story sound plausible...we know you can lie, why didn't you just leave off some details here to sell it better.

[–] billiam0202 87 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ever since he got kicked off Fox, he's been making the pivot to the hard right audience, which includes the narrative that they're in a spiritual war against the literal devil.

It's the same conspiracy-laden bullshit that Alex Jones pushes.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

It's Jon Stewart's fault. Tucker never recovered from that jab about the bow tie.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 weeks ago

And he never wore a bow tie after that. Lol.
If anything, Tucker needs another sit-down with Jon

[–] CharlesDarwin 9 points 3 weeks ago

He's been holding a towel on his rear-end ever since.

[–] CharlesDarwin 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The dude used to wear a bow tie, unironically, and in public no less, so...

[–] NABDad 22 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Bowties are cool.

The bowtie wasn't the problem.

It's the person that makes it uncool.

I'd argue that the fact that he stopped wearing the bowties when he was mocked for it says more about him than the bowties do.

[–] whostosay 10 points 3 weeks ago

It absolutely does. Jon knew it would have to be something low to get under his skin and he was right.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 5 points 3 weeks ago

I've been rocking a bowtie for a while, and my wife loves it. Maybe it's that his were clipons.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

My dad wore a bowtie, looked very cool with it, and he also made a comment about people like Carlson: "you wish you could buy the son of a bitch for what he's worth, then sell him for what he thinks he's worth."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

It's not the bowtie, it's the smug, punchable face.

[–] BananaTrifleViolin 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I bet it's deliberate. Like a power play knowing his story is clearly bullshit but the morons he's appealing to are believing it making him feel even more superior.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

That's also why Trump endlessly escalates his lies. It's a flex.