Managed to respond without answering my questions. Nice! I also like the statement that says that the sexual content appeals to minors. No context or how, why, or what the hell you're even talking about.

So, it sounds like you heard this complaint from someone else, about the "morals" or whatever the fuck you want to call it (cause you never responded to my questions) about the comics community on a different website, and you're parroting it here without any additional thought.

Fuck off with your hollow moral grandstanding that you can't even bother to defend. These comic creators are hurting no one, go find an actual, worthy Crusade to fight, like against capitalism or human trafficking, instead of conflating modern societal taboos with low morality.

[–] Poxlox -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wow, why would I bother responding with that kind of aggro response. You want me to defend that I think her content on r/comics appeals to minors? I've seen it and believe it takes a lot of kid-focused, immature themes, and it takes sexual tones without even being nsfw. Generally to peddle her Patreon, which at higher levels gives you access to her porn. I don't have to audit her content to appease your belief that it doesn't appeal to minors, and especially don't care to because you're a rude ass.

[–] chuckleslord 1 points 2 months ago

I only became rude when you used your response to me as a sound bite rather than to respond to me.

Cool, you have one answer. How does it appeal to children? Answer: kid-focused, immature themes. I completely disagree, everything I've seen is pretty generic millennial focused, so more like late twenties to mid thirties, but whatever. You have very technically answered the question.

And your answer for my second question? Cause that one is kind of the crux of your whole argument. If you need reminding, why does that mean they can't have an onlyfans? To expand that question, even if they make content for children, why can they not also make content only for adults?