this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
467 points (99.0% liked)

World News

39347 readers
4287 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On Wednesday evening, Ukrainian MP Oleksiy Honcharenko said the Ukrainian army had established control over the Sudzha gas hub - a major gas facility involved in the transit of natural gas from Russia to the EU via Ukraine, which has continued despite the war. It is the only point of entry for Russian gas into the EU. 

Although this has not been verified by the BBC, Mr Honcharenko's comment was the first confirmation of an incursion into Russian territory by a Ukrainian official. Kyiv had previously not commented on reports of a cross-border attack.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Why would they want to control the gas facility?

[–] givesomefucks 67 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It is the only point of entry for Russian gas into the EU.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (5 children)

But that gas goes through Ukraine. They could have stopped it at any time.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Cut off tail of snake and it will eventually grow back. Cut off head of snake and it cannot grow back.

[–] kamenlady 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Everybody beheading snakes until the octopus arrives.

[–] Wogi 6 points 4 months ago

Yeah then you just remove the beak

[–] givesomefucks 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

?

By blowing it up and causing an ecological disaster in their own country?

There should be cut off valves where they could have done it safely, but this is Russian built, they used positive power coefficients on their nuclear power plants...

You can't count on common sense safety measures.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

There are definitely cut-off valves. Ukraine already considered cutting off the gas but decided not to.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sabotaging a gas line does a lot to damage your own position because natural gas is VERY toxic. Controlling the source though is ALL power

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

There's shutoff valves, they don't need to blow it up. That's why the story about Russia supposedly blowing up nordstream never made sense either.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They would be liable to be sued for massive amounts for breach of contract of they just shut it off normally. The pipe destruction got them off that hook.

(i'm personally not 100% sure who did it, but there were realistic reasons for Russia to do it)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sued in which court, which would enforce it how exactly? Russia is already doing a whole invasion in breach of international law, (Putin is a defendant personally for war crimes) and the West has basically already sanctioned all assets within its reach.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

sure.

i didn't claim the Kremlin to be the most rational people in the world.

[–] Bookmeat -1 points 4 months ago

It makes sense if the idea is that they want to force EU to use (fund) the new pipelines elsewhere.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

That's a direct pipeline, it seems. Goes straight to the EU.

There's a different pipeline (maybe several, not sure) going through Ukraine.

[–] IphtashuFitz 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sabotage all the metering, etc. and let Ukraine and EU receive as much as they can for free.

[–] Agent641 2 points 4 months ago

And then just hold it. If Russia tries to reclaim it, they end up bombing their own pipeline.

[–] MrNesser 33 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

If they cut it off they remove the one entry point of gas into the EU crippling the export.

Im sure the EU wouldnt be very happy either but they diversified over the last 2 years away from russian gas.

On the other hand holding it also opens the door for concessions from Russia.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Most of the EU is fine with it, it's basically just the governments of Hungary and Slovakia throwing a hissy fit

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Fucking Wah Wah.

Those countries had a chance to be on the right side of history, and they screwed the pooch. Enjoy freezing in a couple of months.

[–] ticho 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

As a Slovak person, currently horribly embarrassed for my own proto-fascist government, I wholeheartedly agree. We've had our chance, but majority of voters over here are mentally 50 years in the past and brainwashed by Russian disinfo campaigns. We really are gullible idiots.

EDIT: That said, it's mostly just our government making performative noise for benefit of its voter base. We are not affected nowhere near as much by Ukraine's current gas block as they want you to believe.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The gas is transiting via Ukraine already (which... what?!) so they could have cut it off anytime before, I don't see how gaining control over one station more changes anything... I'm sure there's some info we are missing here.

[–] MrNesser 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Blowing up a pipeline produces more risks as the gas is toxic and now you have a fireball on your land.

Better to cut it off at the source and sabotage any attempt to restore it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Blowing up? You just close it. A pipeline has hundreds of valves and compressors along the way, no need to blow it up if it goes through your territory.