this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
1199 points (98.6% liked)

politics

18791 readers
4272 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In her first campaign rally as the presumptive Democratic nominee to face Donald Trump, Vice President Kamala Harris took aim at her Republican rival and a widely derided Trump-linked platform that provides a blueprint for the next GOP administration.

“Donald Trump wants to take our country backward,” she said in remarks from Milwaukee on Tuesday, just two days after President Joe Biden ended his re-election campaign and endorsed his vice president.

Harris, who secured enough delegate pledges to clinch the Democratic Party’s nomination within a little over 24 hours after announcing her candidacy, linked Trump to Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation-backed plan for his administration, and one that his campaign is now furiously trying to distance itself from.

“He and his extreme Project 2025 agenda will weaken the middle class. We know we got to take that seriously,” Harris said. ”Can you believe they put that thing in writing? Read it. It’s 900 pages.”

The plan proposes cuts to Social Security and Medicare, tax breaks to corporations that will force “working families to foot the bill” and abolishes the Affordable Care Act, which “will take us back to a time when insurance companies had the power to deny people with preexisting conditions,” Harris said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 95 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Can you believe they put that thing in writing?

Absolutely.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Acting openly horrible has been hugely successful with their base. Maybe it’s gone far enough that all the low information voters out there will start seeing how crazy things have gotten. I know the women in my social circle are pissed, and they’re pretty much all white suburban moms. That’s a group that could have a big effect here.

[–] dejected_warp_core 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I know the women in my social circle are pissed

I'm curious. About what specifically? That "MAGA Manifesto" is huge.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I haven’t exactly interrogated them about all the details, but there is a lot of anger about all the stuff specific to women for sure. I think the Roe overturning primed many women (and people in general) to see that this shit is serious and not just the empty political talk they’re used to mostly ignoring. They are worried it will continue to get worse and make their health care more difficult in general, not just for abortions.

[–] dejected_warp_core 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thank you for sharing. I like seeing people get engaged with stuff that matters, but not at a cost like this.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

Agreed. The cost is too much, but once my wife asked me if I’ve heard about project 2025 a few weeks ago after texting her friends, I knew it had hit some sort of critical mass with the normies (which I say with zero negativity attached to it).

[–] barsquid 11 points 1 month ago

They are correct to worry and it's good they are finally clued in, late as it is.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Not just the Roe overturning, but also the promises that "this won't be a complete ban" and "there will be exceptions" only for there to be complete bans with no exceptions, including unviable pregnancies that threaten the woman's life.

[–] Freefall 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Somewhere there is a site that lets you put in topics that concern you, and it pulls up page numbers and quotes from p2025 that fit. I really need to find and bookmark it for linking...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lemmy hug of death? I see a Heroku app down page.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Looks like that dev haven't kept it up but I've seen 2 other people announce working on it

[–] Freefall 1 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Would appreciate that link too if you find it again

[–] paddirn 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nazis always seem to be stupid enough to leave evidence around of their plans.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Where do you think the villain monologue trope comes from? lol

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I mean they do seem like a Saturday morning cartoon villain just monologuing their evil plan because they think they have the hero down for the count.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Worse, they think they are the heroes.

[–] SLVRDRGN 1 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm surprised they're not trying to sell it.

[–] Xanis 7 points 1 month ago

They haven't figured out a way to fit the whole thing on a shoe.

Just you wait.

[–] demizerone 6 points 1 month ago

The heritage foundation LOVES smelling their own farts.