this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
917 points (98.0% liked)

196

16591 readers
3187 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] disguy_ovahea 106 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (13 children)

So the meme is in agreement that defacing Stonehenge as a protest was pointless?

There are ways to get attention for a cause without defacing one of the seven wonders of the world. Next time spray that cornstarch in BP’s corporate parking lot.

[–] [email protected] 111 points 5 months ago (4 children)

The fact that you missed the Stonehenge under water worries me.

[–] disguy_ovahea 25 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

I saw it. That implies that spraying cornstarch won’t change anything. Think about it.

[–] ameancow 58 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (17 children)

THEN WHAT FUCKING WILL CHANGE ANYTHING

Because this is the only thing that gets people like you to even talk about this.

edit: I want to be clear that I don't care if it's rude or uncivil to talk to people about this like this, I will do it again and again and again and I support efforts to be annoying about it, because at this point it's all we have left to maybe, potentially, get enough people angry enough that someone, somewhere does something. Anything

You're all making your frowny faces and saying "This is counter-productive" and you're simply not getting it.

If through some magical means we were to learn that nuking Manhattan would somehow lower global temperatures, then we would need to do that, just up and vaporize 1.6 million people. It would STILL be the ethically superior action to take if it magically worked. Because in the next century billions of people may die.

If we learned that filling the Grand Canyon with concrete would get companies to stop producing carbon waste and get people to accept inconveniences like electric cars and paper straws without whinging like a wounded toddler, then yes, line up those cement mixers.

When it comes to the trolly problem, you're all not even looking at the right tracks if you're so upset about incivility or annoyances when it comes to climate activism. If anyone is left to do it, one day they will erect statues of these kids throwing soup at paintings and coloring rocks.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Oh your a spineless defeatists! Anyways...

[–] disguy_ovahea 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

That’s the implication of the meme.

I think there are better ways to bring attention to the concerns of climate change than defacing Stonehenge.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

The implication of the meme is that the people talking about how stupid the protests are are actually blind to the very real climate change happening. They might know about it, but they don't really comprehend that defacing the Stonehenge is nothing compared to it being completely underwater, alongside the whole area.

Whether the comic is right or wrong is another thing, and the other guy arguing in bad faith is a cunt, but I strongly believe that's what the comic is meant to portray.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (3 children)

And you're someone with poor spelling and reading comprehension.

It's you're, not your.

[–] MiltownClowns 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Its a poor indication of your position when you mock the delivery instead of the message.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

It's you're, not your.

Oh thank God, OPs message was completely indecipherable until you translated it for us! /s

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

Go back to reddit

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

I think they totally got that, and their point was painting Stonehenge didn't help stop climate change, as evidenced in the last panel.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 80 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Like the 3 private jets that were vandalized with orange paint in London. That's the kind of thing I can support, it makes headlines, it grounds the planes reducing emissions, and it specifically targets those who are causing the most harm.

[–] [email protected] 77 points 5 months ago (4 children)

It hasn't made headlines though. Juststopoil goes after oil terminals, car manufacturers etc pretty often but it's never reported on. The only protest that gets attention is souping painting or spraying cornflour on rocks.

[–] Duamerthrax 14 points 5 months ago

Hmm. I wonder why the media is more heavily reporting one type of vandalism over another?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Like the 3 private jets that were vandalized with orange paint in London.

I didn't hear about that.

I am hearing about this.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They won we're talking about it.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 5 months ago

Because of what happened at Stonehenge.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ameancow 66 points 5 months ago (28 children)

So the meme is in agreement that defacing Stonehenge as a protest was pointless?

It was as pointless as everything else, that's why they did it, it's screaming into the void to get attention.

There are ways to get attention for a cause without defacing one of the seven wonders of the world

Are there though? I'm old enough to remember this has gone on for decades without anyone doing anything of significance and now we're at the actual edge of global catastrophe and STILL people are like "hmn, those kids should be recycling." Bruh, you and so many people have no idea how many lives are going to be lost in the next century while every milquetoast liberal and conservative in the developed world roll their eyes and get pissed at slight annoyances like... checks notes colored corn starch on rocks you will never visit.

It's like trying to shake someone in a dream to get them to pay attention. And the more you scream and hit them, the more they look ahead like zombies.

They HAVE sprayed BP's factories and lots and machines, they have sabotaged equipment and chained themselves to machines and have caused material harm to companies like BP, but that doesn't get any fucking coverage because media doesn't want to encourage "violent activism" for fear of turning away viewers like YOU who are annoyed by such things.

load more comments (28 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (12 children)

So the meme is in agreement that defacing Stonehenge as a protest was pointless?

The meme is saying you're getting angry about the wrong thing.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Now, I am not the biggest fan of those kinds of actions, because they are indeed exploited heavily by the burgeois press, but let's talk about attention. I remember there being at least two paint defacings and damaging of private jets here in Germany in 2023 by similar groups. There was next to no press about it - and if you search for it today, it is genuinely hard to find the articles that even mention them, one I found even focusing on the legal questions of insurance, instead of writing about the broader issues at all:

https://www.t-online.de/region/hamburg/id_100188204/letzte-generation-farbattacke-auf-sylter-privatjet-so-hoch-ist-der-schaden.html https://www.aerotelegraph.com/wer-zahlt-bei-einem-farbanschlag-auf-ein-privatflugzeug

So, you would be surprised - actions that target more "deserving" targets often just.... aren't talked about at all, or very little, small footnotes. This at least starts debates, which cannot be denied.

[–] disguy_ovahea 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

In the same way, give this a year. Do you think it would be referred to as a “great point in addressing climate change,” or “those kids that defaced Stonehenge?”

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago

It might just also be talked about as "that event everyone got angry about because of false reporting", or "that event where I argued with some people online, and I realised they made better points than I thought", or "that event that made me think about what actions would have been better". There is more than the main narrative, and more than just a single engagement with it if there's discussion happening.

So, yeah, it will create a lot of hostility, but maybe even a possibility to recontextualise that hostility for some people.

But not to say you don't have any point at all - it's true that it can make some things harder to properly talk about, makes it all the more important to oppose the main narrative whenever possible and not feed into it.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Quite literally the opposite, no one will remember that Stonehenge was defaced with cornflour, but we will see and remember climate change.

That's just a meme about the fake outrage used as a diversion, instead of the real issue and why people resort to defacing art and monuments for their cause to be in focus.

Any publicity is good publicity.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Madison420 31 points 5 months ago

It's not at all one of the seven wonders of the world, is not even the coolest henge in England and like maybe 5 top five in Europe. It's just famous because it was restored well within your parents lifetime for most of us.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 5 months ago (7 children)

Or its a representation of what the future looks like if we keep fighting the people who fight for all of us.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] dejected_warp_core 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think the punchline goes multiple ways at once: "the protesters were stupid thinking this would help", "the protesters were stupid in how they tried to protest", and "everyone back then was stupid because it's Waterworld now."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

nice whataboutism, "they should do this instead". oh they do, but you don't care when they do.

the delivery didn't deface anything, if you want to focus on the delivery and once again ignore the message at least be honest. willing or not, messages like this do BP bidding

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

See, I'm reading it as saying that even with 'drastic' action like defacing a tourist attraction, governments just don't care to put any serious thought into the climate change problem. They'll put the blame on protestors for making us think for a minute and then go about their way until the world is uninhabitable.

But that's okay, because for a moment they created a lot of shareholder value in their district.

load more comments (2 replies)